Thanking the World: Exploring Gender-Based Differences in Acknowledgment Patterns and Support Systems in Theses

Overview

• This paper examines the acknowledgment sections of Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) in the field of Library and Information Science, focusing on the types of support systems recognized by male and female researchers.
• The researchers used RoBERTa-based models to extract the different forms of support, such as academic, moral, financial, and religious, acknowledged by 1,252 ETDs.
• The study found gender-based differences in the ratio of academic to moral support acknowledged, as well as a preference for advisors to supervise same-gender researchers.

Plain English Explanation

When researchers complete their master's or doctoral theses, they often acknowledge the people and resources that helped them along the way. This study looked at the acknowledgment sections of 1,252 ETDs in the field of Library and Information Science to understand the types of support systems recognized by male and female researchers.

The researchers used advanced language models to identify the different forms of support, such as academic support, moral support, financial assistance, and religious support. They found that while there were no significant gender differences in financial and religious support, there were notable differences in the ratio of academic to moral support acknowledged by male and female researchers.

Additionally, the study revealed that advisors tended to supervise researchers of the same gender, which could impact gender equality in academia. By understanding these nuances in support systems and the challenges faced by researchers of different genders, the researchers hope to help create a more inclusive and supportive academic environment.

Technical Explanation

The researchers utilized a novel method of extracting the various types of support systems acknowledged in 1,252 ETDs using RoBERTa-based models. This allowed them to systematically identify the most prominent forms of support, including academic, moral, financial, and religious.

The analysis revealed that while there were no significant gender-based differences in religious and financial support, the ratio of academic to moral support acknowledged by researchers showed strong gender-based variation. This suggests that female researchers may face unique challenges that require more moral support, while their male counterparts receive relatively more academic support.

Furthermore, the study found that advisors displayed a preference for supervising same-gender researchers. This preference could contribute to gender imbalances in academia and highlights the need for more inclusive mentoring practices.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the nuances of support systems for researchers, particularly in the context of ETDs. However, the study is limited to the field of Library and Information Science, and it would be beneficial to explore whether these patterns hold true in other academic disciplines as well.

Additionally, while the paper identifies gender-based differences in the types of support acknowledged, it does not delve deeply into the underlying reasons for these differences. Further research is needed to understand the societal and cultural factors that may contribute to these disparities.

Finally, the study focuses on the acknowledgment sections of ETDs, which may not fully capture the nuances of support systems throughout the entire research and writing process. Expanding the analysis to include other sources of data, such as interviews with researchers, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the support landscape in academia.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the complexities of support systems for researchers, particularly in the context of Electronic Theses and Dissertations. By identifying gender-based differences in the types of support acknowledged and the preferences of advisors, the researchers have highlighted the need for more inclusive mentoring practices and a deeper understanding of the unique challenges faced by researchers of different genders.

The insights gained from this research have the potential to inform efforts to promote gender equality and create a more supportive academic environment, which could ultimately lead to improved research outcomes and a more diverse and thriving scholarly community.