Thinking beyond Bias: Analyzing Multifaceted Impacts and Implications of AI on Gendered Labour
2406.16207
0
0
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence with its multifaceted technologies and integral role in global production significantly impacts gender dynamics particularly in gendered labor. This paper emphasizes the need to explore AIs broader impacts on gendered labor beyond its current emphasis on the generation and perpetuation of epistemic biases. We draw attention to how the AI industry as an integral component of the larger economic structure is transforming the nature of work. It is expanding the prevalence of platform based work models and exacerbating job insecurity particularly for women. Of critical concern is the increasing exclusion of women from meaningful engagement in the digital labor force. This issue often overlooked demands urgent attention from the AI research community. Understanding AIs multifaceted role in gendered labor requires a nuanced examination of economic transformation and its implications for gender equity. By shedding light on these intersections this paper aims to stimulate in depth discussions and catalyze targeted actions aimed at mitigating the gender disparities accentuated by AI driven transformations.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines the multifaceted impacts of AI on gendered labor, going beyond the critique of bias
- Explores the political economy of AI and its implications for the gendered division of labor
- Addresses how AI is shaping the future of work and its consequences for women and marginalized groups
Plain English Explanation
This paper takes a deep dive into the complex relationship between AI technology and the gendered dynamics of the labor market. Rather than just focusing on the issue of bias in AI systems, the authors adopt a broader political economy perspective to analyze how the rise of AI is fundamentally reshaping the landscape of work and employment, with profound consequences for women and other marginalized groups.
The paper examines how the development and deployment of AI is embedded within the broader capitalist system, and how this interaction serves to amplify existing power structures and inequalities along gender lines. For example, it explores how the increasing automation of certain types of labor, often done by women, can lead to job losses and erode economic security for female workers.
At the same time, the paper also looks at how AI is transforming the nature of work itself, fueling the rise of platform-based "gig" economy jobs that tend to be more precarious and offer fewer protections - again, disproportionately impacting women and other marginalized groups.
By taking this holistic, systemic view, the authors aim to move the discussion around AI and gender beyond simplistic narratives of "bias" and towards a deeper understanding of the complex political and economic forces at play. The goal is to inform more inclusive and equitable approaches to the development and deployment of AI that can better account for and address these multifaceted impacts.
Technical Explanation
The paper adopts a critical political economy framework to analyze the multifaceted impacts of AI on gendered labor. Rather than focusing solely on the issue of bias in AI systems, the authors situate the rise of AI within the broader context of capitalist development and the gendered division of labor.
The key elements of the paper's technical approach include:
-
Examining how the development and deployment of AI technologies is shaped by the profit-driven logic of capitalism, and how this amplifies existing power structures and inequalities along gender lines.
-
Exploring how the automation of certain types of labor, often performed by women, can lead to job losses and erode the economic security of female workers.
-
Analyzing the growth of platform-based "gig" economy jobs facilitated by AI, which tend to be more precarious and offer fewer protections - again, disproportionately impacting women and other marginalized groups.
-
Adopting a multi-level analysis that considers the implications of AI at the individual, organizational, and societal levels, with a particular focus on how these impacts intersect with gender.
-
Drawing on interdisciplinary perspectives from fields such as feminist economics, critical theory, and the sociology of work to develop a more holistic understanding of the complex dynamics at play.
By taking this comprehensive approach, the authors aim to move beyond simplistic notions of "bias" in AI and towards a deeper, more nuanced understanding of the political and economic forces shaping the gendered impacts of these technological transformations.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a valuable and much-needed critical perspective on the relationship between AI and gendered labor, going beyond the prevalent focus on bias and discrimination. By situating the development and deployment of AI within the broader political economy, the authors successfully highlight how these technological changes are deeply entangled with existing power structures and inequalities.
One key strength of the paper is its multifaceted analysis, which considers the impacts of AI at the individual, organizational, and societal levels. This allows the authors to capture the complex and often contradictory ways in which these technologies are reshaping the landscape of work and employment for women and other marginalized groups.
However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the specific mechanisms and pathways through which AI is transforming gendered labor. For example, more detailed case studies or empirical evidence could have strengthened the analysis and provided a clearer roadmap for potential interventions and policy responses.
Additionally, while the paper acknowledges the heterogeneity of women's experiences, there could have been more explicit engagement with the intersections of gender, race, class, and other social identities. This would have further enriched the analysis and highlighted the need for truly inclusive and equitable approaches to AI development and deployment.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of critical research on AI and its social implications. By adopting a political economy perspective, the authors offer a nuanced and thought-provoking examination of the gendered impacts of these technological transformations, which should inform both scholarly and policy discussions going forward.
Conclusion
This paper presents a rigorous and insightful analysis of the multifaceted impacts of AI on gendered labor, moving beyond simplistic notions of bias to examine the broader political and economic forces at play. By situating the development and deployment of AI within the context of capitalist development and the gendered division of labor, the authors shed light on how these technological changes are reshaping the landscape of work and employment in ways that disproportionately affect women and other marginalized groups.
The paper's multi-level, interdisciplinary approach offers a valuable framework for understanding the complex and often contradictory ways in which AI is transforming the nature of work, with important implications for issues of economic security, job precarity, and social inequality. While the analysis could have delved deeper into specific mechanisms and intersectional perspectives, the authors nonetheless make a compelling case for the need to adopt a more holistic and critical lens when examining the social impacts of AI.
Ultimately, this research underscores the importance of developing inclusive and equitable approaches to the design, deployment, and governance of AI technologies - one that recognizes the deeply entrenched power structures and inequalities that shape their development and implementation. By doing so, we can work towards a future of work that is more just, sustainable, and empowering for women and other marginalized groups.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
AI and Identity
Sri Yash Tadimalla, Mary Lou Maher
0
0
AI-empowered technologies' impact on the world is undeniable, reshaping industries, revolutionizing how humans interact with technology, transforming educational paradigms, and redefining social codes. However, this rapid growth is accompanied by two notable challenges: a lack of diversity within the AI field and a widening AI divide. In this context, This paper examines the intersection of AI and identity as a pathway to understand biases, inequalities, and ethical considerations in AI development and deployment. We present a multifaceted definition of AI identity, which encompasses its creators, applications, and their broader impacts. Understanding AI's identity involves understanding the associations between the individuals involved in AI's development, the technologies produced, and the social, ethical, and psychological implications. After exploring the AI identity ecosystem and its societal dynamics, We propose a framework that highlights the need for diversity in AI across three dimensions: Creators, Creations, and Consequences through the lens of identity. This paper proposes the need for a comprehensive approach to fostering a more inclusive and responsible AI ecosystem through the lens of identity.
4/12/2024
🐍
The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making
Valerio Capraro, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean-Franc{c}ois Bonnefon, Pablo Bra~nas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A. C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Chiara Longoni, Pete Lunn, Simone Natale, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander van der Linden, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale
0
0
Generative artificial intelligence has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access, but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.
5/7/2024
🤖
Exploiting the Margin: How Capitalism Fuels AI at the Expense of Minoritized Groups
Nelson Col'on Vargas
0
0
This paper explores the intricate relationship between capitalism, racial injustice, and artificial intelligence (AI), arguing that AI acts as a contemporary vehicle for age-old forms of exploitation. By linking historical patterns of racial and economic oppression with current AI practices, this study illustrates how modern technology perpetuates and deepens societal inequalities. It specifically examines how AI is implicated in the exploitation of marginalized communities through underpaid labor in the gig economy, the perpetuation of biases in algorithmic decision-making, and the reinforcement of systemic barriers that prevent these groups from benefiting equitably from technological advances. Furthermore, the paper discusses the role of AI in extending and intensifying the social, economic, and psychological burdens faced by these communities, highlighting the problematic use of AI in surveillance, law enforcement, and mental health contexts. The analysis concludes with a call for transformative changes in how AI is developed and deployed. Advocating for a reevaluation of the values driving AI innovation, the paper promotes an approach that integrates social justice and equity into the core of technological design and policy. This shift is crucial for ensuring that AI serves as a tool for societal improvement, fostering empowerment and healing rather than deepening existing divides.
5/2/2024
Towards an Ethical and Inclusive Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: A Multidimensional Framework
Ernesto Giralt Hern'andez
0
0
This article analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on contemporary society and the importance of adopting an ethical approach to its development and implementation within organizations. It examines the technocritical perspective of some philosophers and researchers, who warn of the risks of excessive technologization that could undermine human autonomy. However, the article also acknowledges the active role that various actors, such as governments, academics, and civil society, can play in shaping the development of AI aligned with human and social values. A multidimensional approach is proposed that combines ethics with regulation, innovation, and education. It highlights the importance of developing detailed ethical frameworks, incorporating ethics into the training of professionals, conducting ethical impact audits, and encouraging the participation of stakeholders in the design of AI. In addition, four fundamental pillars are presented for the ethical implementation of AI in organizations: 1) Integrated values, 2) Trust and transparency, 3) Empowering human growth, and 4) Identifying strategic factors. These pillars encompass aspects such as alignment with the company's ethical identity, governance and accountability, human-centered design, continuous training, and adaptability to technological and market changes. The conclusion emphasizes that ethics must be the cornerstone of any organization's strategy that seeks to incorporate AI, establishing a solid framework that ensures that technology is developed and used in a way that respects and promotes human values.
5/6/2024