Tight Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints
0
🛠️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The research paper discusses tight bounds for online convex optimization with adversarial constraints.
- It explores the problem of making decisions in a sequential, online setting where the constraints can change in an adversarial manner.
- The paper aims to provide tight regret bounds, which measure the performance of an online algorithm compared to the best fixed decision in hindsight.
Plain English Explanation
In many real-world decision-making scenarios, we need to make choices sequentially without knowing the full information upfront. For example, an online retailer may need to decide which products to stock and promote each day, without knowing the exact demands and constraints they will face in the future.
The paper focuses on a specific type of sequential decision-making problem called online convex optimization with adversarial constraints. In this setting, the decision-maker must choose a point in a convex set at each time step, and the constraints on this set can change in an adversarial (i.e., worst-case) manner over time.
The key challenge is to develop algorithms that can perform well, even in the face of these unpredictable, ever-changing constraints. The performance of an algorithm is typically measured using a concept called "regret," which compares the algorithm's cumulative cost to the cost of the best fixed decision that could have been made in hindsight.
The main contribution of this paper is to provide tight upper and lower bounds on the regret that can be achieved by any algorithm in this setting. These bounds help us understand the fundamental limits of what is possible and guide the development of more effective online optimization algorithms.
Technical Explanation
The paper considers the online convex optimization with adversarial constraints problem. At each time step t, the decision-maker must choose a point x_t in a convex set K_t, where the sets K_t can change in an adversarial manner over time.
The authors establish tight bounds on the regret that can be achieved by any algorithm in this setting. Specifically, they show that the optimal regret is Θ(√(T*D)), where T is the number of time steps, and D is the maximum diameter of the constraint sets K_t.
To prove these bounds, the authors develop new techniques for analyzing the cumulative cost of online algorithms and establishing lower bounds on the best possible performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and rigorous analysis of the online convex optimization with adversarial constraints problem. The tight bounds established in the paper are an important contribution, as they help us understand the fundamental limitations of what can be achieved in this setting.
However, the paper does not address the online non-convex optimization problem, where the objective functions may not be convex. Extending these techniques to the non-convex setting could be an interesting direction for future research.
Additionally, the paper assumes that the adversary has full knowledge of the algorithm being used. Relaxing this assumption and considering the case of partial or limited information available to the adversary could also be a fruitful area for further investigation.
Conclusion
This paper makes significant progress in understanding the fundamental limits of online convex optimization with adversarial constraints. The tight regret bounds established in the work provide a valuable theoretical benchmark for the design and analysis of online optimization algorithms. These insights can have important implications for a wide range of applications, from online resource allocation to adaptive control systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
0
Tight Bounds for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints
Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze
A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $tilde{O}(sqrt{T})$ CCV. We establish this result by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.
Read more5/16/2024
🛠️
0
Optimal Algorithms for Online Convex Optimization with Adversarial Constraints
Abhishek Sinha, Rahul Vaze
A well-studied generalization of the standard online convex optimization (OCO) is constrained online convex optimization (COCO). In COCO, on every round, a convex cost function and a convex constraint function are revealed to the learner after the action for that round is chosen. The objective is to design an online policy that simultaneously achieves a small regret while ensuring a small cumulative constraint violation (CCV) against an adaptive adversary interacting over a horizon of length $T$. A long-standing open question in COCO is whether an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $O(sqrt{T})$ CCV without any restrictive assumptions. For the first time, we answer this in the affirmative and show that an online policy can simultaneously achieve $O(sqrt{T})$ regret and $tilde{O}(sqrt{T})$ CCV. Furthermore, in the case of strongly convex cost and convex constraint functions, the regret guarantee can be improved to $O(log T)$ while keeping the CCV bound the same as above. We establish these results by effectively combining the adaptive regret bound of the AdaGrad algorithm with Lyapunov optimization - a classic tool from control theory. Surprisingly, the analysis is short and elegant.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Optimistic Safety for Online Convex Optimization with Unknown Linear Constraints
Spencer Hutchinson, Tianyi Chen, Mahnoosh Alizadeh
We study the problem of online convex optimization (OCO) under unknown linear constraints that are either static, or stochastically time-varying. For this problem, we introduce an algorithm that we term Optimistically Safe OCO (OSOCO) and show that it enjoys $tilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{T})$ regret and no constraint violation. In the case of static linear constraints, this improves on the previous best known $tilde{mathcal{O}}(T^{2/3})$ regret with only slightly stronger assumptions. In the case of stochastic time-varying constraints, our work supplements existing results that show $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$ regret and $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$ cumulative violation under more general convex constraints albeit a less general feedback model. In addition to our theoretical guarantees, we also give numerical results comparing the performance of OSOCO to existing algorithms.
Read more5/29/2024
🛠️
0
Nearly Optimal Regret for Decentralized Online Convex Optimization
Yuanyu Wan, Tong Wei, Mingli Song, Lijun Zhang
We investigate decentralized online convex optimization (D-OCO), in which a set of local learners are required to minimize a sequence of global loss functions using only local computations and communications. Previous studies have established $O(n^{5/4}rho^{-1/2}sqrt{T})$ and ${O}(n^{3/2}rho^{-1}log T)$ regret bounds for convex and strongly convex functions respectively, where $n$ is the number of local learners, $rho<1$ is the spectral gap of the communication matrix, and $T$ is the time horizon. However, there exist large gaps from the existing lower bounds, i.e., $Omega(nsqrt{T})$ for convex functions and $Omega(n)$ for strongly convex functions. To fill these gaps, in this paper, we first develop novel D-OCO algorithms that can respectively reduce the regret bounds for convex and strongly convex functions to $tilde{O}(nrho^{-1/4}sqrt{T})$ and $tilde{O}(nrho^{-1/2}log T)$. The primary technique is to design an online accelerated gossip strategy that enjoys a faster average consensus among local learners. Furthermore, by carefully exploiting the spectral properties of a specific network topology, we enhance the lower bounds for convex and strongly convex functions to $Omega(nrho^{-1/4}sqrt{T})$ and $Omega(nrho^{-1/2})$, respectively. These lower bounds suggest that our algorithms are nearly optimal in terms of $T$, $n$, and $rho$.
Read more6/26/2024