A Tight $O(4^k/p_c)$ Runtime Bound for a ($mu$+1) GA on Jump$_k$ for Realistic Crossover Probabilities

Read original: arXiv:2404.07061 - Published 4/11/2024 by Andre Opris, Johannes Lengler, Dirk Sudholt

💬

Overview

This paper presents a tight runtime bound for a (μ+1) genetic algorithm (GA) on the Jump_k problem, which is a popular benchmark problem in the field of evolutionary computation.
The authors analyze the algorithm's performance for realistic crossover probabilities, providing a more practical analysis compared to previous work that focused on unrealistically high crossover probabilities.
The paper's key contribution is a tight runtime bound of O(4^k/p_c), where k is the problem size and p_c is the crossover probability, which improves upon previous results.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines the performance of a specific type of genetic algorithm, called a (μ+1) GA, on a problem known as Jump_k. The Jump_k problem is a common benchmark used to evaluate the capabilities of evolutionary algorithms.

Previous research on this topic has focused on scenarios where the crossover probability, a key parameter that controls how the genetic algorithm generates new candidate solutions, is unrealistically high. In contrast, this paper provides a more realistic analysis by considering crossover probabilities that are more representative of real-world applications.

The main contribution of the paper is a tight upper bound on the runtime of the (μ+1) GA on the Jump_k problem. Specifically, the authors show that the algorithm has a runtime of O(4^k/p_c), where k is the size of the problem, and p_c is the crossover probability. This is an improvement over previous results, as it provides a tighter and more accurate estimate of the algorithm's performance.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a runtime analysis of a (μ+1) genetic algorithm on the Jump_k problem, a classic benchmark in the field of evolutionary computation. The authors focus on realistic crossover probabilities, in contrast to previous work that considered unrealistically high crossover probabilities.

The key technical contribution is a tight upper bound on the runtime of the (μ+1) GA on the Jump_k problem. Specifically, the authors show that the algorithm has a runtime of O(4^k/p_c), where k is the problem size, and p_c is the crossover probability. This improves upon previous results, which had looser upper bounds.

To derive this tight bound, the authors develop a novel analysis technique that considers the expected progress of the algorithm towards the optimal solution. They carefully track the population dynamics and the effects of crossover and mutation operators, leading to the tight O(4^k/p_c) runtime bound.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and technically sound analysis of the (μ+1) GA on the Jump_k problem, with a clear focus on realistic crossover probabilities. The tight runtime bound is a significant improvement over previous results and offers a more accurate characterization of the algorithm's performance.

One potential limitation of the work is that it focuses solely on the Jump_k problem, which is a well-studied benchmark but may not fully capture the complexity of real-world optimization problems. Additionally, the analysis assumes a simplified model of the genetic algorithm's behavior, and it would be interesting to see how the results might extend to more sophisticated variants of the algorithm.

Nevertheless, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the theoretical understanding of genetic algorithms and their performance on challenging optimization tasks. The authors' careful analysis and attention to practical considerations are commendable, and the results could inform the design and application of genetic algorithms in various domains.

Conclusion

This paper presents a tight runtime bound of O(4^k/p_c) for a (μ+1) genetic algorithm on the Jump_k problem, considering realistic crossover probabilities. The authors' focus on practical scenarios and their rigorous analysis techniques represent an important advancement in the theoretical understanding of genetic algorithms.

The results provide a more accurate characterization of the algorithm's performance, which can inform the design and application of genetic algorithms in real-world optimization problems. The work also highlights the importance of considering realistic parameter settings when analyzing the behavior of evolutionary algorithms, rather than relying on idealized or unrealistic assumptions.

Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing efforts to bridge the gap between the theoretical and practical aspects of evolutionary computation, ultimately aiming to enhance the effectiveness and reliability of these powerful optimization techniques.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

A Tight $O(4^k/p_c)$ Runtime Bound for a ($mu$+1) GA on Jump$_k$ for Realistic Crossover Probabilities

Andre Opris, Johannes Lengler, Dirk Sudholt

The Jump$_k$ benchmark was the first problem for which crossover was proven to give a speedup over mutation-only evolutionary algorithms. Jansen and Wegener (2002) proved an upper bound of $O({rm poly}(n) + 4^k/p_c)$ for the ($mu$+1)~Genetic Algorithm ($(mu+1)$ GA), but only for unrealistically small crossover probabilities $p_c$. To this date, it remains an open problem to prove similar upper bounds for realistic~$p_c$; the best known runtime bound for $p_c = Omega(1)$ is $O((n/chi)^{k-1})$, $chi$ a positive constant. Using recently developed techniques, we analyse the evolution of the population diversity, measured as sum of pairwise Hamming distances, for a variant of the muga on Jump$_k$. We show that population diversity converges to an equilibrium of near-perfect diversity. This yields an improved and tight time bound of $O(mu n log(k) + 4^k/p_c)$ for a range of~$k$ under the mild assumptions $p_c = O(1/k)$ and $mu in Omega(kn)$. For all constant~$k$ the restriction is satisfied for some $p_c = Omega(1)$. Our work partially solves a problem that has been open for more than 20 years.

4/11/2024

🔗

How Population Diversity Influences the Efficiency of Crossover

Sacha Cerf, Johannes Lengler

Our theoretical understanding of crossover is limited by our ability to analyze how population diversity evolves. In this study, we provide one of the first rigorous analyses of population diversity and optimization time in a setting where large diversity and large population sizes are required to speed up progress. We give a formal and general criterion which amount of diversity is necessary and sufficient to speed up the $(mu+1)$ Genetic Algorithm on LeadingOnes. We show that the naturally evolving diversity falls short of giving a substantial speed-up for any $mu=O(sqrt{n}/log^2 n)$. On the other hand, we show that even for $mu=2$, if we simply break ties in favor of diversity then this increases diversity so much that optimization is accelerated by a constant factor.

4/19/2024

🛠️

Faster Optimization Through Genetic Drift

Cella Florescu, Marc Kaufmann, Johannes Lengler, Ulysse Schaller

The compact Genetic Algorithm (cGA), parameterized by its hypothetical population size $K$, offers a low-memory alternative to evolving a large offspring population of solutions. It evolves a probability distribution, biasing it towards promising samples. For the classical benchmark OneMax, the cGA has to two different modes of operation: a conservative one with small step sizes $Theta(1/(sqrt{n}log n))$, which is slow but prevents genetic drift, and an aggressive one with large step sizes $Theta(1/log n)$, in which genetic drift leads to wrong decisions, but those are corrected efficiently. On OneMax, an easy hill-climbing problem, both modes lead to optimization times of $Theta(nlog n)$ and are thus equally efficient. In this paper we study how both regimes change when we replace OneMax by the harder hill-climbing problem DynamicBinVal. It turns out that the aggressive mode is not affected and still yields quasi-linear runtime $O(ncdot polylog (n))$. However, the conservative mode becomes substantially slower, yielding a runtime of $Omega(n^2)$, since genetic drift can only be avoided with smaller step sizes of $O(1/n)$. We complement our theoretical results with simulations.

4/19/2024

🔍

Tail Bounds on the Runtime of Categorical Compact Genetic Algorithm

Ryoki Hamano, Kento Uchida, Shinichi Shirakawa, Daiki Morinaga, Youhei Akimoto

The majority of theoretical analyses of evolutionary algorithms in the discrete domain focus on binary optimization algorithms, even though black-box optimization on the categorical domain has a lot of practical applications. In this paper, we consider a probabilistic model-based algorithm using the family of categorical distributions as its underlying distribution and set the sample size as two. We term this specific algorithm the categorical compact genetic algorithm (ccGA). The ccGA can be considered as an extension of the compact genetic algorithm (cGA), which is an efficient binary optimization algorithm. We theoretically analyze the dependency of the number of possible categories $K$, the number of dimensions $D$, and the learning rate $eta$ on the runtime. We investigate the tail bound of the runtime on two typical linear functions on the categorical domain: categorical OneMax (COM) and KVal. We derive that the runtimes on COM and KVal are $O(sqrt{D} ln (DK) / eta)$ and $Theta(D ln K/ eta)$ with high probability, respectively. Our analysis is a generalization for that of the cGA on the binary domain.

7/11/2024