Tissue Concepts: supervised foundation models in computational pathology
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces "Tissue Concepts", a new approach to computational pathology using supervised foundation models
- Explores the potential of these models to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging
- Highlights the significance of this research in advancing the field of computational pathology
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach called "Tissue Concepts" that uses supervised foundation models for computational pathology. These models are trained on large datasets of medical images, such as tissue samples, to help make accurate diagnoses and assessments.
The researchers believe that these supervised foundation models can improve the accuracy and efficiency of medical imaging analysis compared to traditional methods. By learning from extensive datasets, the models can develop a deeper understanding of different tissue types and disease patterns, allowing them to provide more reliable and consistent diagnoses.
This research is significant because it has the potential to transform the field of computational pathology. By leveraging the power of supervised foundation models, doctors and researchers may be able to make more accurate diagnoses, leading to better treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Tissue Concepts" that leverages supervised foundation models for computational pathology. These models are pre-trained on large datasets of medical images, such as tissue samples, and then fine-tuned for specific tasks, like disease classification or tissue segmentation.
The researchers highlight the potential of these supervised foundation models to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging analysis. By learning from extensive datasets, the models can develop a more comprehensive understanding of different tissue types and disease patterns, which can lead to more reliable and consistent diagnoses.
The paper discusses the architectural design and training strategies used to develop the Tissue Concepts models. It also presents the results of experiments that demonstrate the models' superior performance compared to traditional approaches in various computational pathology tasks, such as breast cancer classification and lymph node metastasis detection.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling case for the use of supervised foundation models in computational pathology, but it also acknowledges some potential limitations and areas for further research.
One of the key challenges mentioned is the need for large, high-quality datasets to train these models effectively. The researchers note that the availability and quality of medical imaging data can vary, which may impact the models' performance in real-world clinical settings.
Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of interpretability and explainability in medical AI systems. While the Tissue Concepts models demonstrate strong predictive performance, it is crucial to understand the underlying decision-making processes to ensure trust and acceptance among medical professionals.
Further research could explore ways to enhance the interpretability of these models, such as incorporating explainable AI techniques or enabling interactive visualization tools for medical experts.
Conclusion
The "Tissue Concepts" approach represents a promising step forward in the field of computational pathology, leveraging supervised foundation models to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. By learning from extensive datasets of medical images, these models can develop a deeper understanding of tissue characteristics and disease patterns, leading to more reliable and consistent diagnoses.
This research has significant implications for the future of medical imaging analysis, as it has the potential to improve patient outcomes by enabling more accurate and timely diagnoses. While the paper highlights some areas for further exploration, the overall findings suggest that supervised foundation models could be a transformative technology in the field of computational pathology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Tissue Concepts: supervised foundation models in computational pathology
Till Nicke, Jan Raphael Schaefer, Henning Hoefener, Friedrich Feuerhake, Dorit Merhof, Fabian Kiessling, Johannes Lotz
Due to the increasing workload of pathologists, the need for automation to support diagnostic tasks and quantitative biomarker evaluation is becoming more and more apparent. Foundation models have the potential to improve generalizability within and across centers and serve as starting points for data efficient development of specialized yet robust AI models. However, the training foundation models themselves is usually very expensive in terms of data, computation, and time. This paper proposes a supervised training method that drastically reduces these expenses. The proposed method is based on multi-task learning to train a joint encoder, by combining 16 different classification, segmentation, and detection tasks on a total of 912,000 patches. Since the encoder is capable of capturing the properties of the samples, we term it the Tissue Concepts encoder. To evaluate the performance and generalizability of the Tissue Concepts encoder across centers, classification of whole slide images from four of the most prevalent solid cancers - breast, colon, lung, and prostate - was used. The experiments show that the Tissue Concepts model achieve comparable performance to models trained with self-supervision, while requiring only 6% of the amount of training patches. Furthermore, the Tissue Concepts encoder outperforms an ImageNet pre-trained encoder on both in-domain and out-of-domain data.
Read more9/6/2024
✨
0
Benchmarking foundation models as feature extractors for weakly-supervised computational pathology
Peter Neidlinger, Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Hannah Sophie Muti, Tim Lenz, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner, Marko van Treeck, Rupert Langer, Bastian Dislich, Hans Michael Behrens, Christoph Rocken, Sebastian Foersch, Daniel Truhn, Antonio Marra, Oliver Lester Saldanha, Jakob Nikolas Kather
Advancements in artificial intelligence have driven the development of numerous pathology foundation models capable of extracting clinically relevant information. However, there is currently limited literature independently evaluating these foundation models on truly external cohorts and clinically-relevant tasks to uncover adjustments for future improvements. In this study, we benchmarked ten histopathology foundation models on 13 patient cohorts with 6,791 patients and 9,493 slides from lung, colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers. The models were evaluated on weakly-supervised tasks related to biomarkers, morphological properties, and prognostic outcomes. We show that a vision-language foundation model, CONCH, yielded the highest performance in 42% of tasks when compared to vision-only foundation models. The experiments reveal that foundation models trained on distinct cohorts learn complementary features to predict the same label, and can be fused to outperform the current state of the art. Creating an ensemble of complementary foundation models outperformed CONCH in 66% of tasks. Moreover, our findings suggest that data diversity outweighs data volume for foundation models. Our work highlights actionable adjustments to improve pathology foundation models.
Read more8/29/2024
📈
0
RudolfV: A Foundation Model by Pathologists for Pathologists
Jonas Dippel, Barbara Feulner, Tobias Winterhoff, Timo Milbich, Stephan Tietz, Simon Schallenberg, Gabriel Dernbach, Andreas Kunft, Simon Heinke, Marie-Lisa Eich, Julika Ribbat-Idel, Rosemarie Krupar, Philipp Anders, Niklas Preni{ss}l, Philipp Jurmeister, David Horst, Lukas Ruff, Klaus-Robert Muller, Frederick Klauschen, Maximilian Alber
Artificial intelligence has started to transform histopathology impacting clinical diagnostics and biomedical research. However, while many computational pathology approaches have been proposed, most current AI models are limited with respect to generalization, application variety, and handling rare diseases. Recent efforts introduced self-supervised foundation models to address these challenges, yet existing approaches do not leverage pathologist knowledge by design. In this study, we present a novel approach to designing foundation models for computational pathology, incorporating pathologist expertise, semi-automated data curation, and a diverse dataset from over 15 laboratories, including 58 tissue types, and encompassing 129 different histochemical and immunohistochemical staining modalities. We demonstrate that our model RudolfV surpasses existing state-of-the-art foundation models across different benchmarks focused on tumor microenvironment profiling, biomarker evaluation, and reference case search while exhibiting favorable robustness properties. Our study shows how domain-specific knowledge can increase the efficiency and performance of pathology foundation models and enable novel application areas.
Read more6/12/2024
0
A Clinical Benchmark of Public Self-Supervised Pathology Foundation Models
Gabriele Campanella, Shengjia Chen, Ruchika Verma, Jennifer Zeng, Aryeh Stock, Matt Croken, Brandon Veremis, Abdulkadir Elmas, Kuan-lin Huang, Ricky Kwan, Jane Houldsworth, Adam J. Schoenfeld, Chad Vanderbilt
The use of self-supervised learning (SSL) to train pathology foundation models has increased substantially in the past few years. Notably, several models trained on large quantities of clinical data have been made publicly available in recent months. This will significantly enhance scientific research in computational pathology and help bridge the gap between research and clinical deployment. With the increase in availability of public foundation models of different sizes, trained using different algorithms on different datasets, it becomes important to establish a benchmark to compare the performance of such models on a variety of clinically relevant tasks spanning multiple organs and diseases. In this work, we present a collection of pathology datasets comprising clinical slides associated with clinically relevant endpoints including cancer diagnoses and a variety of biomarkers generated during standard hospital operation from two medical centers. We leverage these datasets to systematically assess the performance of public pathology foundation models and provide insights into best practices for training new foundation models and selecting appropriate pretrained models.
Read more7/12/2024