To Word Senses and Beyond: Inducing Concepts with Contextualized Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2406.20054 - Published 7/1/2024 by Bastien Li'etard, Pascal Denis, Mikaella Keller
Total Score

0

To Word Senses and Beyond: Inducing Concepts with Contextualized Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores how contextualized language models can be used to induce conceptual knowledge beyond just word senses.
  • The researchers propose novel methods for discovering and representing higher-level concepts from language model embeddings.
  • They demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on various conceptual reasoning tasks, showing that it outperforms existing word sense induction techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Contextualized language models, like BERT and GPT, have become powerful tools for understanding language. They can capture the meaning of words based on the context they appear in. However, these models typically focus on learning individual word senses rather than the broader conceptual knowledge that underlies language.

The researchers in this paper wanted to go beyond just learning word senses and instead induce higher-level conceptual knowledge from language models. They developed new techniques to discover and represent abstract concepts that go beyond the dictionary definitions of individual words.

For example, the word "bank" can refer to a financial institution or the edge of a river. A typical language model would learn these distinct word senses. But the researchers' approach aims to also capture the broader conceptual knowledge that "bank" is related to things like money, finance, and geography.

By inducing this kind of conceptual knowledge, the researchers showed their models could perform better on tasks that require deeper language understanding, like answering analogy questions or generating definitions for new words.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of two new techniques for inducing conceptual knowledge from contextualized language models:

  1. Concept Induction: The researchers developed an unsupervised method to discover clusters of related word embeddings that represent higher-level concepts. This builds on prior work in word sense induction, but aims to induce more abstract conceptual knowledge.

  2. Concept-Aware Data Construction: To better capture conceptual knowledge, the researchers proposed a new technique for constructing training data that explicitly models relationships between words and the broader concepts they belong to. This "concept-aware data construction" approach was shown to improve the models' ability to reason about concepts.

The researchers evaluated their concept induction methods on a range of tasks, including analogy completion, definition generation, and conceptual reasoning. Their models outperformed strong baselines, demonstrating the value of inducing conceptual knowledge beyond just word senses.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of moving beyond just learning word senses and instead inducing higher-level conceptual knowledge from language models. The proposed techniques for concept induction and concept-aware data construction are novel contributions that could have broad implications for natural language understanding.

However, a potential limitation of the work is that the concept induction process relies on clustering word embeddings, which can be sensitive to hyperparameter choices and the initial clustering algorithm. The paper does not provide a thorough analysis of the stability or interpretability of the induced concepts.

Additionally, while the researchers demonstrate improved performance on conceptual reasoning tasks, it's unclear how their approach would scale to real-world applications that require even deeper language understanding. Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability and robustness of these concept induction methods.

Conclusion

This paper presents a promising direction for enhancing the conceptual understanding of language models beyond just learning individual word senses. By inducing higher-level conceptual knowledge, the researchers showed their models could perform better on tasks that require deeper language comprehension.

The proposed techniques for concept induction and concept-aware data construction offer a fresh perspective on how to imbue language models with richer semantic knowledge. As language AI systems become more ubiquitous, this work highlights the importance of going beyond surface-level word meanings and capturing the underlying conceptual structure of language.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

To Word Senses and Beyond: Inducing Concepts with Contextualized Language Models
Total Score

0

To Word Senses and Beyond: Inducing Concepts with Contextualized Language Models

Bastien Li'etard, Pascal Denis, Mikaella Keller

Polysemy and synonymy are two crucial interrelated facets of lexical ambiguity. While both phenomena have been studied extensively in NLP, leading to dedicated systems, they are often been considered independently. While many tasks dealing with polysemy (e.g. Word Sense Disambiguiation or Induction) highlight the role of a word's senses, the study of synonymy is rooted in the study of concepts, i.e. meaning shared across the lexicon. In this paper, we introduce Concept Induction, the unsupervised task of learning a soft clustering among words that defines a set of concepts directly from data. This task generalizes that of Word Sense Induction. We propose a bi-level approach to Concept Induction that leverages both a local lemma-centric view and a global cross-lexicon perspective to induce concepts. We evaluate the obtained clustering on SemCor's annotated data and obtain good performances (BCubed F1 above 0.60). We find that the local and the global levels are mutually beneficial to induce concepts and also senses in our setting. Finally, we create static embeddings representing our induced concepts and use them on the Word-in-Context task, obtaining competitive performances with the State-of-the-Art.

Read more

7/1/2024

Multilingual Substitution-based Word Sense Induction
Total Score

0

Multilingual Substitution-based Word Sense Induction

Denis Kokosinskii, Nikolay Arefyev

Word Sense Induction (WSI) is the task of discovering senses of an ambiguous word by grouping usages of this word into clusters corresponding to these senses. Many approaches were proposed to solve WSI in English and a few other languages, but these approaches are not easily adaptable to new languages. We present multilingual substitution-based WSI methods that support any of 100 languages covered by the underlying multilingual language model with minimal to no adaptation required. Despite the multilingual capabilities, our methods perform on par with the existing monolingual approaches on popular English WSI datasets. At the same time, they will be most useful for lower-resourced languages which miss lexical resources available for English, thus, have higher demand for unsupervised methods like WSI.

Read more

5/21/2024

Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooM
Total Score

0

Concept Induction: Analyzing Unstructured Text with High-Level Concepts Using LLooM

Michelle S. Lam, Janice Teoh, James Landay, Jeffrey Heer, Michael S. Bernstein

Data analysts have long sought to turn unstructured text data into meaningful concepts. Though common, topic modeling and clustering focus on lower-level keywords and require significant interpretative work. We introduce concept induction, a computational process that instead produces high-level concepts, defined by explicit inclusion criteria, from unstructured text. For a dataset of toxic online comments, where a state-of-the-art BERTopic model outputs women, power, female, concept induction produces high-level concepts such as Criticism of traditional gender roles and Dismissal of women's concerns. We present LLooM, a concept induction algorithm that leverages large language models to iteratively synthesize sampled text and propose human-interpretable concepts of increasing generality. We then instantiate LLooM in a mixed-initiative text analysis tool, enabling analysts to shift their attention from interpreting topics to engaging in theory-driven analysis. Through technical evaluations and four analysis scenarios ranging from literature review to content moderation, we find that LLooM's concepts improve upon the prior art of topic models in terms of quality and data coverage. In expert case studies, LLooM helped researchers to uncover new insights even from familiar datasets, for example by suggesting a previously unnoticed concept of attacks on out-party stances in a political social media dataset.

Read more

4/19/2024

🎯

Total Score

0

Speakers Fill Lexical Semantic Gaps with Context

Tiago Pimentel, Rowan Hall Maudslay, Dami'an Blasi, Ryan Cotterell

Lexical ambiguity is widespread in language, allowing for the reuse of economical word forms and therefore making language more efficient. If ambiguous words cannot be disambiguated from context, however, this gain in efficiency might make language less clear -- resulting in frequent miscommunication. For a language to be clear and efficiently encoded, we posit that the lexical ambiguity of a word type should correlate with how much information context provides about it, on average. To investigate whether this is the case, we operationalise the lexical ambiguity of a word as the entropy of meanings it can take, and provide two ways to estimate this -- one which requires human annotation (using WordNet), and one which does not (using BERT), making it readily applicable to a large number of languages. We validate these measures by showing that, on six high-resource languages, there are significant Pearson correlations between our BERT-based estimate of ambiguity and the number of synonyms a word has in WordNet (e.g. $rho = 0.40$ in English). We then test our main hypothesis -- that a word's lexical ambiguity should negatively correlate with its contextual uncertainty -- and find significant correlations on all 18 typologically diverse languages we analyse. This suggests that, in the presence of ambiguity, speakers compensate by making contexts more informative.

Read more

5/29/2024