Toward the application of XAI methods in EEG-based systems

Read original: arXiv:2210.06554 - Published 5/21/2024 by Andrea Apicella, Francesco Isgr`o, Andrea Pollastro, Roberto Prevete
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the well-known Dataset Shift Problem in the context of classifying Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals for Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).
  • The non-stationarity of EEG signals can lead to poor performance in BCI classification systems used across different sessions, even for the same person.
  • The researchers hypothesize that the Dataset Shift problem can be mitigated by using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to identify and transform relevant characteristics of the input for classification.
  • The paper presents an experimental analysis of explanations produced by various XAI methods on an ML system trained on an EEG dataset for emotion recognition.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at a common problem in machine learning called the Dataset Shift Problem. This problem occurs when the data used to train a model is different from the data the model is used on in the real world.

One example of this is in Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs), which use Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals to control devices. EEG signals can change over time, even for the same person. This means a model trained on one set of EEG data may not work well when used with a different set of EEG data from the same person.

The researchers hypothesize that this Dataset Shift problem can be reduced by using eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods. XAI techniques can help identify the important features in the EEG data that the model is using to make its predictions.

The researchers analyze the explanations produced by different XAI methods on a machine learning model trained to recognize emotions from EEG data. Their results show that many of the relevant features identified by XAI are shared across different sessions, and can be used to build a model that generalizes better.

However, the relevant features also seem to depend heavily on the specific EEG data itself. This suggests there may still be challenges in fully addressing the Dataset Shift problem in this domain.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents an experimental analysis of using eXplainable AI (XAI) methods to address the Dataset Shift problem in the context of Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) classification.

The researchers start from the hypothesis that the Dataset Shift problem, which can lead to poor generalization performance of BCI classification systems across different sessions, can be mitigated by exploiting XAI methods to identify and transform the relevant characteristics of the input EEG signals for classification.

They conduct an analysis on an ML system trained on a typical EEG dataset for emotion recognition. The researchers apply several XAI methods, including SHAP, Integrated Gradients, and Occlusion, to explain the decisions made by the trained model.

The results show that many of the relevant components identified by the XAI methods are shared across different sessions, suggesting they can be used to build a more generalizable BCI classification system. However, the researchers also find that the relevant components are highly dependent on the specific input EEG signals.

This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve the generalization capabilities of EEG-based BCIs and optimize EEG decoding using post-hoc XAI explanations. The insights from this study could also inform domain generalization approaches for BCIs that leverage knowledge distillation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful analysis of using XAI methods to address the Dataset Shift problem in EEG-based BCI classification. The researchers acknowledge the limitations of their study, noting that the relevant components identified by XAI seem highly dependent on the specific input data.

This suggests that while XAI can provide valuable insights, there may still be challenges in fully overcoming the Dataset Shift problem in this domain. The researchers mention the need for further research to explore techniques like transfer learning or meta-learning to improve the generalization capabilities of BCI systems.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential biases or quirks of the XAI methods themselves, which could also influence the interpretability and reliability of the explanations. Further investigation into the comparative performance and robustness of different XAI approaches in this context would be valuable.

Overall, the paper makes a solid contribution to the ongoing efforts to enhance the real-world applicability of EEG-based BCIs. The insights gained from this study can help inform future research directions and the development of more robust and generalizable BCI systems.

Conclusion

This paper explores the use of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to address the well-known Dataset Shift problem in the context of Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) classification systems.

The researchers' key findings suggest that many of the relevant features identified by XAI techniques are shared across different sessions, which can be leveraged to build more generalizable BCI classification models. However, the relevant features also appear to be highly dependent on the specific input EEG signals.

This work contributes to the ongoing efforts to improve the generalization capabilities of EEG-based BCIs and optimize EEG decoding using post-hoc XAI explanations. The insights from this study could also inform domain generalization approaches for BCIs that utilize knowledge distillation.

While XAI methods can provide valuable insights, the researchers acknowledge the need for further research to fully overcome the Dataset Shift problem in this domain, potentially exploring techniques like transfer learning or meta-learning. Continued advancements in this area can help make EEG-based BCIs more robust and applicable in real-world settings.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

Toward the application of XAI methods in EEG-based systems

Andrea Apicella, Francesco Isgr`o, Andrea Pollastro, Roberto Prevete

An interesting case of the well-known Dataset Shift Problem is the classification of Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals in the context of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). The non-stationarity of EEG signals can lead to poor generalisation performance in BCI classification systems used in different sessions, also from the same subject. In this paper, we start from the hypothesis that the Dataset Shift problem can be alleviated by exploiting suitable eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods to locate and transform the relevant characteristics of the input for the goal of classification. In particular, we focus on an experimental analysis of explanations produced by several XAI methods on an ML system trained on a typical EEG dataset for emotion recognition. Results show that many relevant components found by XAI methods are shared across the sessions and can be used to build a system able to generalise better. However, relevant components of the input signal also appear to be highly dependent on the input itself.

Read more

5/21/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Machine Learning Strategies to Improve Generalization in EEG-based Emotion Assessment: a Systematic Review

Andrea Apicella, Pasquale Arpaia, Giovanni D'Errico, Davide Marocco, Giovanna Mastrati, Nicola Moccaldi, Roberto Prevete

A systematic review on machine-learning strategies for improving generalizability (cross-subjects and cross-sessions) electroencephalography (EEG) based in emotion classification was realized. In this context, the non-stationarity of EEG signals is a critical issue and can lead to the Dataset Shift problem. Several architectures and methods have been proposed to address this issue, mainly based on transfer learning methods. 418 papers were retrieved from the Scopus, IEEE Xplore and PubMed databases through a search query focusing on modern machine learning techniques for generalization in EEG-based emotion assessment. Among these papers, 75 were found eligible based on their relevance to the problem. Studies lacking a specific cross-subject and cross-session validation strategy and making use of other biosignals as support were excluded. On the basis of the selected papers' analysis, a taxonomy of the studies employing Machine Learning (ML) methods was proposed, together with a brief discussion on the different ML approaches involved. The studies with the best results in terms of average classification accuracy were identified, supporting that transfer learning methods seem to perform better than other approaches. A discussion is proposed on the impact of (i) the emotion theoretical models and (ii) psychological screening of the experimental sample on the classifier performances.

Read more

8/20/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Interpretable and Robust AI in EEG Systems: A Survey

Xinliang Zhou, Chenyu Liu, Zhongruo Wang, Liming Zhai, Ziyu Jia, Cuntai Guan, Yang Liu

The close coupling of artificial intelligence (AI) and electroencephalography (EEG) has substantially advanced human-computer interaction (HCI) technologies in the AI era. Different from traditional EEG systems, the interpretability and robustness of AI-based EEG systems are becoming particularly crucial. The interpretability clarifies the inner working mechanisms of AI models and thus can gain the trust of users. The robustness reflects the AI's reliability against attacks and perturbations, which is essential for sensitive and fragile EEG signals. Thus the interpretability and robustness of AI in EEG systems have attracted increasing attention, and their research has achieved great progress recently. However, there is still no survey covering recent advances in this field. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive survey and summarize the interpretable and robust AI techniques for EEG systems. Specifically, we first propose a taxonomy of interpretability by characterizing it into three types: backpropagation, perturbation, and inherently interpretable methods. Then we classify the robustness mechanisms into four classes: noise and artifacts, human variability, data acquisition instability, and adversarial attacks. Finally, we identify several critical and unresolved challenges for interpretable and robust AI in EEG systems and further discuss their future directions.

Read more

8/27/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Novel Epileptic Seizure Detection Techniques and their Empirical Analysis

Rabel Guharoy, Nanda Dulal Jana, Suparna Biswas, Lalit Garg

An Electroencephalogram (EEG) is a non-invasive exam that records the brain's electrical activity. This is used to help diagnose conditions such as different brain problems. EEG signals are taken for epilepsy detection, and with Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and machine learning classifier, they perform epilepsy detection. In Epilepsy seizure detection, machine learning classifiers and statistical features are mainly used. The hidden information in the EEG signal helps detect diseases affecting the brain. Sometimes it is complicated to identify the minimum changes in the EEG in the time and frequency domain's purpose. The DWT can give a suitable decomposition of the signals in different frequency bands and feature extraction. We use the tri-dimensionality reduction algorithm, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Independent Component Analysis (ICA), and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). Finally, features are selected by using a fusion rule and at the last step, three different classifiers, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and K-Nearest-Neighbor (KNN) have been used individually for the classification. The proposed framework is tested on the Bonn dataset. The simulation results provide 100% accuracy for the LDA and NB combination outperforming accuracy with other classifiers combinations, including 89.17% for LDA and SVM, 80.42% for LDA and KNN, 89.92% for PCA and NB, 85.58% PCA and SVM, 80.42% PCA and KNN, 82.33% for ICA and NB, 90.42% for ICA and SVM, 90% for ICA and KNN. Also, the LDA and NB combination shows the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Precision, and Recall of 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%. The results prove the effectiveness of this model.

Read more

5/28/2024