Toward an Artist-Centred AI

Read original: arXiv:2406.11866 - Published 6/19/2024 by Gordan Krekovic, Antonio Poscic, Dejan Grba
Total Score

0

🤖

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the arts, focusing on the principles, practices, and tools that should guide the use of AI in artistic creativity.
  • The authors propose a framework of atomic attributes that summarize the values deemed important for artistically pertinent AI, such as being unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable.
  • The framework was developed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization, considering the differentiating potentials of AI beyond the purely technical ontology.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how artificial intelligence (AI) is affecting the world of art. As AI becomes more advanced, it's starting to have a big impact on things like how art is made, shared, enjoyed, and even paid for. The authors wanted to figure out what principles, practices, and tools should guide the use of AI in the arts to make sure it's a positive change.

They came up with a framework that lists the key values they think AI should have to be truly helpful for artistic creativity. These include being unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable. In other words, AI in the arts should be able to come up with new and surprising ideas, offer a wide range of options, be accessible to artists, and be able to adapt and grow over time.

The authors looked at the challenges that AI creates for art, like how it might change the way art is made, shared, and paid for. They also considered how AI can be used in unique ways, beyond just the technical side of things. The goal was to figure out what kind of AI would be best suited for the arts and help artists thrive.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for the use of AI in the arts, focusing on the principles, practices, and tools that should guide the development and application of AI in artistic creativity. The authors contextualise the notions of suitability and desirability of AI in the arts by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization.

The framework is composed of a set of atomic attributes that summarize the values of AI deemed important for artistic creativity. These attributes include being unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable. The authors argue that artistically pertinent AI should possess these qualities, going beyond the purely technical ontology and considering the differentiating potentials of AI.

The paper's approach involved exploring the challenges that AI presents to the arts, such as those discussed in related works like AI Art is Theft: Labour Extraction & Exploitation, Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency & Ownership, and Towards an Ethical & Inclusive Implementation of AI. By considering these challenges and the unique capabilities of AI, the authors propose a framework to guide the development of AI systems that can positively impact artistic creativity.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and nuanced perspective on the role of AI in the arts, acknowledging the complex challenges and opportunities that emerge from the intersection of these two domains. The proposed framework of atomic attributes, such as being unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable, offers a valuable lens through which to evaluate the suitability and desirability of AI-based tools and systems for artistic creativity.

One potential limitation of the research is the breadth of the topic, as the authors attempt to address the broad impact of AI on art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization. This could lead to a somewhat surface-level treatment of certain aspects, and the authors may have benefited from a more focused exploration of specific use cases or artistic disciplines.

Additionally, while the framework provides a conceptual foundation, the practical implementation and empirical validation of these attributes could be an area for further research. The paper does not delve deeply into how these principles can be translated into concrete design guidelines or evaluation criteria for AI-powered artistic tools and systems.

Nevertheless, the paper makes a valuable contribution by bringing the discussion of AI and the arts into the mainstream discourse and offering a starting point for more nuanced, multidisciplinary dialogues on the topic. The authors' emphasis on unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable AI characteristics encourages a forward-thinking and adaptable approach to the integration of these technologies within the arts.

Conclusion

This paper presents a framework for guiding the development and application of AI in the arts, emphasizing the importance of principles such as being unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable. By examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization, and considering the unique capabilities of AI beyond the purely technical, the authors have proposed a set of values that they believe should underpin artistically pertinent AI systems.

The framework offers a valuable starting point for discussions on the responsible and beneficial integration of AI within the arts, encouraging a shift in perspective from viewing AI as a disruptive force to considering it as a tool that can enhance and empower artistic creativity. As the influence of AI continues to grow, this research provides a foundation for further exploration and collaboration between technologists, artists, and policymakers to ensure that the development of AI aligns with the values and needs of the artistic community.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤖

Total Score

0

Toward an Artist-Centred AI

Gordan Krekovic, Antonio Poscic, Dejan Grba

Awareness about the immense impact that artificial intelligence (AI) might have or already has made on the social, economic, political, and cultural realities of our world has become part of the mainstream public discourse. Attributes such as ethical, responsible, or explainable emerge as associative and descriptive nominal references in guidelines that influence perspectives on AI application and development. This paper contextualizes the notions of suitability and desirability of principles, practices, and tools related to the use of AI in the arts. The result is a framework drafted as a set of atomic attributes that summarize the values of AI deemed important for artistic creativity. It was composed by examining the challenges that AI poses to art production, distribution, consumption, and monetization. Considering the differentiating potentials of AI and taking a perspective aside from the purely technical ontology, we argue that artistically pertinent AI should be unexpected, diversified, affordant, and evolvable.

Read more

6/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

A Shift In Artistic Practices through Artificial Intelligence

K{i}vanc{c} Tatar, Petter Ericson, Kelsey Cotton, Paola Torres N'u~nez del Prado, Roser Batlle-Roca, Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel, Sara Ljungblad, Georgios Diapoulis, Jabbar Hussain

The explosion of content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) models has initiated a cultural shift in arts, music, and media, whereby roles are changing, values are shifting, and conventions are challenged. The vast, readily available dataset of the Internet has created an environment for AI models to be trained on any content on the Web. With AI models shared openly and used by many globally, how does this new paradigm shift challenge the status quo in artistic practices? What kind of changes will AI technology bring to music, arts, and new media?

Read more

4/11/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Foregrounding Artist Opinions: A Survey Study on Transparency, Ownership, and Fairness in AI Generative Art

Juniper Lovato, Julia Zimmerman, Isabelle Smith, Peter Dodds, Jennifer Karson

Generative AI tools are used to create art-like outputs and sometimes aid in the creative process. These tools have potential benefits for artists, but they also have the potential to harm the art workforce and infringe upon artistic and intellectual property rights. Without explicit consent from artists, Generative AI creators scrape artists' digital work to train Generative AI models and produce art-like outputs at scale. These outputs are now being used to compete with human artists in the marketplace as well as being used by some artists in their generative processes to create art. We surveyed 459 artists to investigate the tension between artists' opinions on Generative AI art's potential utility and harm. This study surveys artists' opinions on the utility and threat of Generative AI art models, fair practices in the disclosure of artistic works in AI art training models, ownership and rights of AI art derivatives, and fair compensation. Results show that a majority of artists believe creators should disclose what art is being used in AI training, that AI outputs should not belong to model creators, and express concerns about AI's impact on the art workforce and who profits from their art. We hope the results of this work will further meaningful collaboration and alignment between the art community and Generative AI researchers and developers.

Read more

5/16/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

AI Art is Theft: Labour, Extraction, and Exploitation, Or, On the Dangers of Stochastic Pollocks

Trystan S. Goetze

Since the launch of applications such as DALL-E, Midjourney, and Stable Diffusion, generative artificial intelligence has been controversial as a tool for creating artwork. While some have presented longtermist worries about these technologies as harbingers of fully automated futures to come, more pressing is the impact of generative AI on creative labour in the present. Already, business leaders have begun replacing human artistic labour with AI-generated images. In response, the artistic community has launched a protest movement, which argues that AI image generation is a kind of theft. This paper analyzes, substantiates, and critiques these arguments, concluding that AI image generators involve an unethical kind of labour theft. If correct, many other AI applications also rely upon theft.

Read more

5/16/2024