Towards a Cyber Information Ontology

Read original: arXiv:2407.18998 - Published 8/19/2024 by David Limbaugh, Mark Jensen, John Beverley
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a set of terms to act as an interface between cyber ontologies and higher-level ontologies.
  • These terms focus on the unique aspects of cyber information management, such as copying data and aggregates of copies.
  • The goal is to better integrate cyber ontologies with top- and mid-level ontologies like Basic Formal Ontology and the Common Core Ontologies.

Plain English Explanation

In the world of digital information, there are often many copies of the same data floating around. This paper proposes a set of terms that can be used to help integrate cyber-related concepts, like file systems and data fusion, with more general ontologies that provide a high-level understanding of the world.

The key ideas center around the numerous acts of copying information, the resulting aggregates of copies, and the "faithful" members of those aggregates that accurately represent all the other copies. These unique aspects of cyber information management need to be accounted for when trying to link cyber ontologies to broader conceptual frameworks.

By establishing this bridge between cyber-specific terms and top-level ontologies, the researchers hope to enable better integration and understanding of digital information and its management across different domains and applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a set of terms intended to serve as an interface between cyber ontologies, such as those dealing with file systems or data fusion, and higher-level ontologies like Basic Formal Ontology and the Common Core Ontologies.

The key focus is on capturing the unique aspects of cyber information management, which often involves numerous acts of copying data and the resulting aggregates of those copies. The paper introduces terms like "faithful member" to describe copies that accurately represent all other copies in an aggregate.

By defining these cyber-specific concepts and how they relate to top-level ontological frameworks, the researchers aim to facilitate better integration and interoperability between cyber-oriented ontologies and more general conceptual models of the world.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful approach to bridging the gap between cyber-specific ontologies and higher-level ontologies, acknowledging the need to account for the unique characteristics of digital information management.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical application or evaluation of the proposed terminology and integration approach. It would be helpful to see how these terms and concepts can be implemented in real-world ontology design and usage, as well as any potential challenges or limitations that may arise.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more thorough discussion of the implications and potential impact of this work. Exploring how the proposed integration could influence the development of cyber-related systems or enable new use cases would strengthen the overall contribution of the research.

Conclusion

This paper puts forth a set of terms intended to act as a bridge between cyber ontologies and top-level ontological frameworks. By focusing on the distinctive aspects of cyber information management, such as data copying and aggregation, the researchers aim to facilitate better integration and understanding of digital concepts within broader conceptual models.

While the paper lays the theoretical groundwork, further research is needed to explore the practical application and real-world impact of this approach. Nonetheless, the proposed terminology and integration strategy represent an important step towards aligning cyber-specific ontologies with more general ontological structures, which could have significant implications for the design and development of digital systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Towards a Cyber Information Ontology

David Limbaugh, Mark Jensen, John Beverley

This paper introduces a set of terms that are intended to act as an interface between cyber ontologies (like a file system ontology or a data fusion ontology) and top- and mid-level ontologies, specifically Basic Formal Ontology and the Common Core Ontologies. These terms center on what makes cyberinformation management unique: numerous acts of copying items of information, the aggregates of copies that result from those acts, and the faithful members of those aggregates that represent all other members.

Read more

8/19/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Foundations for Digital Twins

Finn Wilson, Regina Hurley, Dan Maxwell, Jon McLellan, John Beverley

The growing reliance on digital twins across various industries and domains brings with it semantic interoperability challenges. Ontologies are a well-known strategy for addressing such challenges, though given the complexity of the phenomenon, there are risks of reintroducing the interoperability challenges at the level of ontology representations. In the interest of avoiding such pitfalls, we introduce and defend characterizations of digital twins within the context of the Common Core Ontologies, an extension of the widely-used Basic Formal Ontology. We provide a set of definitions and design patterns relevant to the domain of digital twins, highlighted by illustrative use cases of digital twins and their physical counterparts. In doing so, we provide a foundation on which to build more sophisticated ontological content related and connected to digital twins.

Read more

8/19/2024

Total Score

0

The Common Core Ontologies

Mark Jensen, Giacomo De Colle, Sean Kindya, Cameron More, Alexander P. Cox, John Beverley

The Common Core Ontologies (CCO) are designed as a mid-level ontology suite that extends the Basic Formal Ontology. CCO has since been increasingly adopted by a broad group of users and applications and is proposed as the first standard mid-level ontology. Despite these successes, documentation of the contents and design patterns of the CCO has been comparatively minimal. This paper is a step toward providing enhanced documentation for the mid-level ontology suite through a discussion of the contents of the eleven ontologies that collectively comprise the Common Core Ontology suite.

Read more

8/19/2024

📈

Total Score

0

New!Redefining Data-Centric Design: A New Approach with a Domain Model and Core Data Ontology for Computational Systems

William Johnson, James Davis, Tara Kelly

This paper presents an innovative data-centric paradigm for designing computational systems by introducing a new informatics domain model. The proposed model moves away from the conventional node-centric framework and focuses on data-centric categorization, using a multimodal approach that incorporates objects, events, concepts, and actions. By drawing on interdisciplinary research and establishing a foundational ontology based on these core elements, the model promotes semantic consistency and secure data handling across distributed ecosystems. We also explore the implementation of this model as an OWL 2 ontology, discuss its potential applications, and outline its scalability and future directions for research. This work aims to serve as a foundational guide for system designers and data architects in developing more secure, interoperable, and scalable data systems.

Read more

9/17/2024