Towards Exact Gradient-based Training on Analog In-memory Computing
2406.12774
0
0
Abstract
Given the high economic and environmental costs of using large vision or language models, analog in-memory accelerators present a promising solution for energy-efficient AI. While inference on analog accelerators has been studied recently, the training perspective is underexplored. Recent studies have shown that the workhorse of digital AI training - stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithm converges inexactly when applied to model training on non-ideal devices. This paper puts forth a theoretical foundation for gradient-based training on analog devices. We begin by characterizing the non-convergent issue of SGD, which is caused by the asymmetric updates on the analog devices. We then provide a lower bound of the asymptotic error to show that there is a fundamental performance limit of SGD-based analog training rather than an artifact of our analysis. To address this issue, we study a heuristic analog algorithm called Tiki-Taka that has recently exhibited superior empirical performance compared to SGD and rigorously show its ability to exactly converge to a critical point and hence eliminates the asymptotic error. The simulations verify the correctness of the analyses.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for training machine learning models on analog in-memory computing (AIC) hardware, which has the potential to be more energy-efficient than traditional digital computing.
- The key challenge is that AIC hardware introduces analog noise and other non-ideal effects that can make it difficult to apply standard gradient-based training methods.
- The authors propose several techniques to address these challenges, including a new training method called "Exact Gradient Training" and hardware-aware model design.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is focused on training machine learning models to run efficiently on a special type of computer hardware called "analog in-memory computing" (AIC). AIC has some advantages over traditional digital computers, like using less power. However, the analog nature of AIC introduces challenges when trying to train machine learning models on this hardware.
The authors of the paper present new techniques to address these challenges. One key idea is a new training method called "Exact Gradient Training" that is designed to work well with the quirks of AIC hardware. They also discuss ways to design the machine learning models themselves to be a better fit for AIC.
Overall, the goal is to be able to train highly accurate machine learning models that can run very efficiently on this specialized AIC hardware. This could lead to things like more energy-efficient AI systems that can run on smaller, low-power devices.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes techniques to enable exact gradient-based training of machine learning models on analog in-memory computing (AIC) hardware. AIC leverages the physical properties of memory cells to perform computation in a more energy-efficient manner compared to traditional digital architectures. However, the analog nature of AIC introduces significant challenges for standard gradient-based training algorithms, which rely on precise gradients.
The authors first analyze the sources of error and non-idealities in AIC hardware, including analog noise, device variations, and limited precision. They then develop a new training methodology called "Exact Gradient Training" that aims to work around these issues. Key aspects include:
- Hardware-aware model design to make the models more robust to AIC non-idealities.
- Techniques to estimate the true gradients despite the analog noise and imprecision.
- Training protocols that leverage decentralized, asynchronous training on heterogeneous AIC hardware.
Through experiments, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their Exact Gradient Training approach in training accurate models on AIC hardware, outperforming alternative methods. They also provide analysis and insights into the interplay between model architecture, training, and the underlying AIC hardware characteristics.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to enable efficient gradient-based training of machine learning models on analog in-memory computing hardware. The key strengths are the thorough analysis of the hardware challenges and the development of techniques to work around them, such as the Exact Gradient Training method.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations. For example, the training protocols assume a specific AIC hardware architecture and may need to be adapted for other designs. Additionally, the experiments are conducted on simulated AIC hardware, so the performance on real hardware may differ.
It would also be valuable to see more discussion of the potential tradeoffs and limitations of the proposed techniques. For example, how do the hardware-aware model designs impact model capacity or expressiveness? What are the computational and memory overhead costs of the Exact Gradient Training approach?
Overall, this paper represents an important step towards realizing the potential of analog computing for efficient machine learning. The techniques developed could have significant implications for the design of future low-power AI systems and distributed, edge-based AI applications.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the challenge of training accurate machine learning models on analog in-memory computing (AIC) hardware, which has the potential to be more energy-efficient than traditional digital architectures. The authors propose a new training method called "Exact Gradient Training" and other techniques to address the non-ideal effects of AIC, such as analog noise and limited precision.
Through experiments, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in training models that can perform well on simulated AIC hardware. This work represents an important step towards unlocking the power-efficient capabilities of analog computing for machine learning applications, with potential implications for the design of future low-power AI systems and distributed, edge-based AI.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌿
Thermodynamic Natural Gradient Descent
Kaelan Donatella, Samuel Duffield, Maxwell Aifer, Denis Melanson, Gavin Crooks, Patrick J. Coles
0
0
Second-order training methods have better convergence properties than gradient descent but are rarely used in practice for large-scale training due to their computational overhead. This can be viewed as a hardware limitation (imposed by digital computers). Here we show that natural gradient descent (NGD), a second-order method, can have a similar computational complexity per iteration to a first-order method, when employing appropriate hardware. We present a new hybrid digital-analog algorithm for training neural networks that is equivalent to NGD in a certain parameter regime but avoids prohibitively costly linear system solves. Our algorithm exploits the thermodynamic properties of an analog system at equilibrium, and hence requires an analog thermodynamic computer. The training occurs in a hybrid digital-analog loop, where the gradient and Fisher information matrix (or any other positive semi-definite curvature matrix) are calculated at given time intervals while the analog dynamics take place. We numerically demonstrate the superiority of this approach over state-of-the-art digital first- and second-order training methods on classification tasks and language model fine-tuning tasks.
5/24/2024
The Promise of Analog Deep Learning: Recent Advances, Challenges and Opportunities
Aditya Datar, Pramit Saha
0
0
Much of the present-day Artificial Intelligence (AI) utilizes artificial neural networks, which are sophisticated computational models designed to recognize patterns and solve complex problems by learning from data. However, a major bottleneck occurs during a device's calculation of weighted sums for forward propagation and optimization procedure for backpropagation, especially for deep neural networks, or networks with numerous layers. Exploration into different methods of implementing neural networks is necessary for further advancement of the area. While a great deal of research into AI hardware in both directions, analog and digital implementation widely exists, much of the existing survey works lacks discussion on the progress of analog deep learning. To this end, we attempt to evaluate and specify the advantages and disadvantages, along with the current progress with regards to deep learning, for analog implementations. In this paper, our focus lies on the comprehensive examination of eight distinct analog deep learning methodologies across multiple key parameters. These parameters include attained accuracy levels, application domains, algorithmic advancements, computational speed, and considerations of energy efficiency and power consumption. We also identify the neural network-based experiments implemented using these hardware devices and discuss comparative performance achieved by the different analog deep learning methods along with an analysis of their current limitations. Overall, we find that Analog Deep Learning has great potential for future consumer-level applications, but there is still a long road ahead in terms of scalability. Most of the current implementations are more proof of concept and are not yet practically deployable for large-scale models.
6/21/2024
🏋️
On-Device Training Under 256KB Memory
Ji Lin, Ligeng Zhu, Wei-Ming Chen, Wei-Chen Wang, Chuang Gan, Song Han
0
0
On-device training enables the model to adapt to new data collected from the sensors by fine-tuning a pre-trained model. Users can benefit from customized AI models without having to transfer the data to the cloud, protecting the privacy. However, the training memory consumption is prohibitive for IoT devices that have tiny memory resources. We propose an algorithm-system co-design framework to make on-device training possible with only 256KB of memory. On-device training faces two unique challenges: (1) the quantized graphs of neural networks are hard to optimize due to low bit-precision and the lack of normalization; (2) the limited hardware resource does not allow full back-propagation. To cope with the optimization difficulty, we propose Quantization-Aware Scaling to calibrate the gradient scales and stabilize 8-bit quantized training. To reduce the memory footprint, we propose Sparse Update to skip the gradient computation of less important layers and sub-tensors. The algorithm innovation is implemented by a lightweight training system, Tiny Training Engine, which prunes the backward computation graph to support sparse updates and offload the runtime auto-differentiation to compile time. Our framework is the first solution to enable tiny on-device training of convolutional neural networks under 256KB SRAM and 1MB Flash without auxiliary memory, using less than 1/1000 of the memory of PyTorch and TensorFlow while matching the accuracy on tinyML application VWW. Our study enables IoT devices not only to perform inference but also to continuously adapt to new data for on-device lifelong learning. A video demo can be found here: https://youtu.be/0pUFZYdoMY8.
4/4/2024
⚙️
Signal Processing Meets SGD: From Momentum to Filter
Zhipeng Yao, Guiyuan Fu, Ying Li, Yu Zhang, Dazhou Li, Rui Yu
0
0
In deep learning, stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and its momentum-based variants are widely used for optimization, but they typically suffer from slow convergence. Conversely, existing adaptive learning rate optimizers speed up convergence but often compromise generalization. To resolve this issue, we propose a novel optimization method designed to accelerate SGD's convergence without sacrificing generalization. Our approach reduces the variance of the historical gradient, improves first-order moment estimation of SGD by applying Wiener filter theory, and introduces a time-varying adaptive gain. Empirical results demonstrate that SGDF (SGD with Filter) effectively balances convergence and generalization compared to state-of-the-art optimizers.
5/24/2024