Towards a FAIR Documentation of Workflows and Models in Applied Mathematics

Read original: arXiv:2403.17778 - Published 8/1/2024 by Marco Reidelbach, Bjorn Schembera, Marcus Weber
Total Score

0

Towards a FAIR Documentation of Workflows and Models in Applied Mathematics

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the need for standardized and open documentation of workflows and models in applied mathematics.
  • It introduces two initiatives, MaRDMO and MathModDB, that aim to address this need.
  • The paper explores the connection between these two initiatives and their potential to improve the reproducibility and transparency of research in applied mathematics.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about the importance of having clear and accessible documentation for the workflows and models used in applied mathematics research. The authors explain that often the details of how a particular mathematical model was developed or a workflow was carried out are not shared openly, making it difficult for other researchers to understand and build upon the work.

To address this, the paper introduces two related initiatives:

  1. MaRDMO (link): This is a framework for documenting the metadata and steps involved in mathematical and computational workflows, making them more transparent and reproducible.

  2. MathModDB (link): This is a database that aims to catalog and document the various mathematical models and algorithms used in applied mathematics and related fields, again with the goal of improving transparency and reproducibility.

The key idea is that by having standardized and open documentation of these workflows and models, it will be easier for other researchers to understand, validate, and build upon the work that has been done. This can lead to faster progress and more trustworthy research in applied mathematics.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces two initiatives that aim to improve the documentation and transparency of workflows and models in applied mathematics:

  1. MaRDMO (Mathematical Research Data Management Ontology): This is a framework for documenting the metadata and steps involved in mathematical and computational workflows (link). The goal is to provide a standardized way to capture information about the data, software, and methods used in a particular workflow, making it easier for others to understand, reproduce, and extend the work.

  2. MathModDB (Mathematical Models Database): This is a database that aims to catalog and document the various mathematical models and algorithms used in applied mathematics and related fields (link). The database includes information about the mathematical formulations, implementation details, and application domains of these models, again with the goal of improving transparency and reproducibility.

The paper explores the connection between these two initiatives and how they can be used together to provide a more comprehensive documentation framework for applied mathematics research. For example, the MaRDMO ontology can be used to capture the workflow-level metadata for a study that uses a particular mathematical model, while the MathModDB can provide detailed information about the model itself.

Critical Analysis

The paper highlights the important issue of documentation and transparency in applied mathematics research. The authors make a convincing case for the need to improve the way workflows and models are documented, as this can have significant implications for the reproducibility and trustworthiness of the research.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential challenges or limitations of the MaRDMO and MathModDB initiatives. For example, it does not discuss the difficulties that may arise in getting researchers to consistently and accurately document their work, or the challenges of maintaining and curating such large-scale databases over time.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential concerns around the privacy or intellectual property implications of openly documenting workflows and models, which could be a barrier to adoption in some research communities.

Overall, the paper provides a strong case for the importance of this issue, but more discussion of the practical challenges and potential trade-offs would have strengthened the analysis.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical need for improved documentation and transparency in applied mathematics research. The authors introduce two initiatives, MaRDMO and MathModDB, that aim to address this need by providing standardized frameworks for documenting workflows and mathematical models.

By making the details of research workflows and mathematical models more openly available, these initiatives have the potential to significantly improve the reproducibility and trustworthiness of applied mathematics research. This, in turn, could lead to faster progress and more reliable insights in this important field.

While the paper does not delve deeply into the potential challenges of implementation, it makes a compelling case for the importance of this work and the value it could bring to the applied mathematics community and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Towards a FAIR Documentation of Workflows and Models in Applied Mathematics
Total Score

0

Towards a FAIR Documentation of Workflows and Models in Applied Mathematics

Marco Reidelbach, Bjorn Schembera, Marcus Weber

Modeling-Simulation-Optimization workflows play a fundamental role in applied mathematics. The Mathematical Research Data Initiative, MaRDI, responded to this by developing a FAIR and machine-interpretable template for a comprehensive documentation of such workflows. MaRDMO, a Plugin for the Research Data Management Organiser, enables scientists from diverse fields to document and publish their workflows on the MaRDI Portal seamlessly using the MaRDI template. Central to these workflows are mathematical models. MaRDI addresses them with the MathModDB ontology, offering a structured formal model description. Here, we showcase the interaction between MaRDMO and the MathModDB Knowledge Graph through an algebraic modeling workflow from the Digital Humanities. This demonstration underscores the versatility of both services beyond their original numerical domain.

Read more

8/1/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

MaRDIFlow: A CSE workflow framework for abstracting meta-data from FAIR computational experiments

Pavan L. Veluvali, Jan Heiland, Peter Benner

Numerical algorithms and computational tools are instrumental in navigating and addressing complex simulation and data processing tasks. The exponential growth of metadata and parameter-driven simulations has led to an increasing demand for automated workflows that can replicate computational experiments across platforms. In general, a computational workflow is defined as a sequential description for accomplishing a scientific objective, often described by tasks and their associated data dependencies. If characterized through input-output relation, workflow components can be structured to allow interchangeable utilization of individual tasks and their accompanying metadata. In the present work, we develop a novel computational framework, namely, MaRDIFlow, that focuses on the automation of abstracting meta-data embedded in an ontology of mathematical objects. This framework also effectively addresses the inherent execution and environmental dependencies by incorporating them into multi-layered descriptions. Additionally, we demonstrate a working prototype with example use cases and methodically integrate them into our workflow tool and data provenance framework. Furthermore, we show how to best apply the FAIR principles to computational workflows, such that abstracted components are Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable in nature.

Read more

5/2/2024

⚙️

Total Score

0

Ontologies for Models and Algorithms in Applied Mathematics and Related Disciplines

Bjorn Schembera, Frank Wubbeling, Hendrik Kleikamp, Christine Biedinger, Jochen Fiedler, Marco Reidelbach, Aurela Shehu, Burkhard Schmidt, Thomas Koprucki, Dorothea Iglezakis, Dominik Goddeke

In applied mathematics and related disciplines, the modeling-simulation-optimization workflow is a prominent scheme, with mathematical models and numerical algorithms playing a crucial role. For these types of mathematical research data, the Mathematical Research Data Initiative has developed, merged and implemented ontologies and knowledge graphs. This contributes to making mathematical research data FAIR by introducing semantic technology and documenting the mathematical foundations accordingly. Using the concrete example of microfracture analysis of porous media, it is shown how the knowledge of the underlying mathematical model and the corresponding numerical algorithms for its solution can be represented by the ontologies.

Read more

8/1/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Towards a Knowledge Graph for Models and Algorithms in Applied Mathematics

Bjorn Schembera, Frank Wubbeling, Hendrik Kleikamp, Burkhard Schmidt, Aurela Shehu, Marco Reidelbach, Christine Biedinger, Jochen Fiedler, Thomas Koprucki, Dorothea Iglezakis, Dominik Goddeke

Mathematical models and algorithms are an essential part of mathematical research data, as they are epistemically grounding numerical data. In order to represent models and algorithms as well as their relationship semantically to make this research data FAIR, two previously distinct ontologies were merged and extended, becoming a living knowledge graph. The link between the two ontologies is established by introducing computational tasks, as they occur in modeling, corresponding to algorithmic tasks. Moreover, controlled vocabularies are incorporated and a new class, distinguishing base quantities from specific use case quantities, was introduced. Also, both models and algorithms can now be enriched with metadata. Subject-specific metadata is particularly relevant here, such as the symmetry of a matrix or the linearity of a mathematical model. This is the only way to express specific workflows with concrete models and algorithms, as the feasible solution algorithm can only be determined if the mathematical properties of a model are known. We demonstrate this using two examples from different application areas of applied mathematics. In addition, we have already integrated over 250 research assets from applied mathematics into our knowledge graph.

Read more

8/20/2024