Towards a Framework for Openness in Foundation Models: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence
0
🎲
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a framework for understanding the concept of "openness" in the context of AI systems, including foundation models.
- It summarizes previous discussions on the topic, analyzes the potential reasons for pursuing openness, and outlines how openness varies across different parts of the AI stack.
- The goal is to provide a common descriptive framework to deepen the understanding of openness in AI and enable further work on definitions of openness and safety.
Plain English Explanation
The paper aims to help us better understand the pros and cons of making AI systems, including foundation models, open source. This is an important topic that has been debated a lot, but the discussions have often been too general or focused on specific technical details.
The key challenge is that defining "open source" for AI is different from traditional software because the way AI systems are developed and used is quite different. To address this, the paper presents a framework for thinking about openness across the different components of an AI system, from the underlying models to the overall system architecture.
By providing this framework, the authors hope to enable more nuanced and practical decision-making around opening up AI systems, including understanding the various trade-offs and potential risks and opportunities. This should help advance the discussions around defining openness and safety in AI in a more rigorous and constructive way.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by summarizing the ongoing debate around the benefits and risks of open sourcing foundation models and other AI systems. It notes that this discussion has often lacked nuance, as defining "open source" for AI is more complex than for traditional software.
To address this, the authors present a framework for analyzing openness across the different components or "layers" of an AI system. This includes examining openness at both the model level (e.g., the underlying neural networks) and the system level (e.g., the overall architecture and software).
The framework outlines various potential reasons for pursuing openness, such as enabling transparency, fostering collaboration, and accelerating innovation. It then explores how the degree of openness can vary across the different parts of the AI stack, based on factors like the sensitivity of the information, the complexity of the components, and the goals of the stakeholders.
By providing this structured approach, the paper aims to help researchers, developers, and policymakers make more nuanced and informed decisions about opening up their AI-based tools and systems in a responsible manner.
Critical Analysis
The paper does a commendable job of highlighting the nuances involved in defining and pursuing openness for AI systems, which is a significant challenge not fully addressed in previous discussions.
One potential limitation is that the framework presented is quite general and may require further refinement and validation to be truly useful for specific AI applications and contexts. Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential risks and safety concerns associated with open sourcing AI systems, which is an important consideration.
Further research could explore how the openness framework applies to different types of AI systems (e.g., language models, computer vision, robotics) and the specific trade-offs and mitigation strategies for the various risks involved. Engaging with a broader range of stakeholders, including policymakers, ethicists, and the public, could also help shape a more comprehensive understanding of openness in AI.
Conclusion
This paper presents a valuable framework for analyzing the nuances of openness in the context of AI systems, including foundation models. By providing a structured approach to understanding the different components and potential reasons for pursuing openness, the authors aim to enable more informed and practical decision-making around the responsible and safe development and deployment of open source AI.
As the discussions around the benefits and risks of open sourcing AI continue, this framework can serve as a foundation for further research and dialogue, ultimately helping to shape a more comprehensive and thoughtful approach to openness in the AI ecosystem.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎲
0
Towards a Framework for Openness in Foundation Models: Proceedings from the Columbia Convening on Openness in Artificial Intelligence
Adrien Basdevant, Camille Franc{c}ois, Victor Storchan, Kevin Bankston, Ayah Bdeir, Brian Behlendorf, Merouane Debbah, Sayash Kapoor, Yann LeCun, Mark Surman, Helen King-Turvey, Nathan Lambert, Stefano Maffulli, Nik Marda, Govind Shivkumar, Justine Tunney
Over the past year, there has been a robust debate about the benefits and risks of open sourcing foundation models. However, this discussion has often taken place at a high level of generality or with a narrow focus on specific technical attributes. In part, this is because defining open source for foundation models has proven tricky, given its significant differences from traditional software development. In order to inform more practical and nuanced decisions about opening AI systems, including foundation models, this paper presents a framework for grappling with openness across the AI stack. It summarizes previous work on this topic, analyzes the various potential reasons to pursue openness, and outlines how openness varies in different parts of the AI stack, both at the model and at the system level. In doing so, its authors hope to provide a common descriptive framework to deepen a nuanced and rigorous understanding of openness in AI and enable further work around definitions of openness and safety in AI.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Defense Priorities in the Open-Source AI Debate: A Preliminary Assessment
Masao Dahlgren
A spirited debate is taking place over the regulation of open foundation models: artificial intelligence models whose underlying architectures and parameters are made public and can be inspected, modified, and run by end users. Proposed limits on releasing open foundation models may have significant defense industrial impacts. If model training is a form of defense production, these impacts deserve further scrutiny. Preliminary evidence suggests that an open foundation model ecosystem could benefit the U.S. Department of Defense's supplier diversity, sustainment, cybersecurity, and innovation priorities. Follow-on analyses should quantify impacts on acquisition cost and supply chain security.
Read more8/20/2024
📈
2
The Model Openness Framework: Promoting Completeness and Openness for Reproducibility, Transparency, and Usability in Artificial Intelligence
Matt White, Ibrahim Haddad, Cailean Osborne, Xiao-Yang Liu Yanglet, Ahmed Abdelmonsef, Sachin Varghese
Generative AI (GAI) offers unprecedented opportunities for research and innovation, but its commercialization has raised concerns about transparency, reproducibility, and safety. Many open GAI models lack the necessary components for full understanding and reproducibility, and some use restrictive licenses whilst claiming to be ``open-source''. To address these concerns, we propose the Model Openness Framework (MOF), a ranked classification system that rates machine learning models based on their completeness and openness, following principles of open science, open source, open data, and open access. The MOF requires specific components of the model development lifecycle to be included and released under appropriate open licenses. This framework aims to prevent misrepresentation of models claiming to be open, guide researchers and developers in providing all model components under permissive licenses, and help individuals and organizations identify models that can be safely adopted without restrictions. By promoting transparency and reproducibility, the MOF combats ``openwashing'' practices and establishes completeness and openness as primary criteria alongside the core tenets of responsible AI. Wide adoption of the MOF will foster a more open AI ecosystem, benefiting research, innovation, and adoption of state-of-the-art models.
Read more8/16/2024
🤖
0
Towards Responsible and Safe AI in the Era of Foudnation Models: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Systems
Qinghua Lu, Liming Zhu, Xiwei Xu, Zhenchang Xing, Jon Whittle
The release of ChatGPT, Gemini, and other large language model has drawn huge interests on foundations models. There is a broad consensus that foundations models will be the fundamental building blocks for future AI systems. However, there is a lack of systematic guidance on the architecture design. Particularly, the the rapidly growing capabilities of foundations models can eventually absorb other components of AI systems, posing challenges of moving boundary and interface evolution in architecture design. Furthermore, incorporating foundations models into AI systems raises significant concerns about responsible and safe AI due to their opaque nature and rapidly advancing intelligence. To address these challenges, the paper first presents an architecture evolution of AI systems in the era of foundation models, transitioning from foundation-model-as-a-connector to foundation-model-as-a-monolithic architecture. The paper then identifies key design decisions and proposes a pattern-oriented reference architecture for designing responsible foundation-model-based systems. The patterns can enable the potential of foundation models while ensuring associated risks.
Read more7/17/2024