Towards Investigating Biases in Spoken Conversational Search
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates biases in spoken conversational search systems
- Examines how user characteristics and system factors may introduce biases
- Aims to develop methods to detect and mitigate biases in such systems
Plain English Explanation
Spoken conversational search systems, like voice assistants, can sometimes exhibit biases. This paper looks at how the characteristics of users and the design of the search system itself may introduce biases. The goal is to develop ways to identify and reduce these biases, so that these systems can provide fair and unbiased information to all users.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines biases in spoken conversational search, which involves users interacting with an AI system using voice commands to search for information. The researchers investigated how factors like the user's gender, age, and cognitive biases, as well as system design choices, could lead to biased search results or interactions. They also explored methods to detect and mitigate these biases.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable starting point for understanding and addressing biases in spoken conversational search systems. However, it acknowledges that more research is needed to fully characterize the nature and sources of these biases, as well as to develop effective mitigation strategies. The authors note that their analysis is limited to a few specific user and system factors, and that other factors may also contribute to biases. Further work is needed to expand the investigation and validate the proposed approaches in real-world deployments.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step towards understanding and addressing biases in spoken conversational search systems. By identifying potential sources of bias and exploring methods for detection and mitigation, the researchers lay the groundwork for developing more fair and inclusive voice-based information retrieval systems. As these technologies become more prevalent, ensuring their equitable performance for all users is a crucial area of research.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Investigating Biases in Spoken Conversational Search
Sachin Pathiyan Cherumanal, Falk Scholer, Johanne R. Trippas, Damiano Spina
Voice-based systems like Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, and Apple Siri, along with the growing popularity of OpenAI's ChatGPT and Microsoft's Copilot, serve diverse populations, including visually impaired and low-literacy communities. This reflects a shift in user expectations from traditional search to more interactive question-answering models. However, presenting information effectively in voice-only channels remains challenging due to their linear nature. This limitation can impact the presentation of complex queries involving controversial topics with multiple perspectives. Failing to present diverse viewpoints may perpetuate or introduce biases and affect user attitudes. Balancing information load and addressing biases is crucial in designing a fair and effective voice-based system. To address this, we (i) review how biases and user attitude changes have been studied in screen-based web search, (ii) address challenges in studying these changes in voice-based settings like SCS, (iii) outline research questions, and (iv) propose an experimental setup with variables, data, and instruments to explore biases in a voice-based setting like Spoken Conversational Search.
Read more9/4/2024
💬
0
Towards Detecting and Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Spoken Conversational Search
Kaixin Ji, Sachin Pathiyan Cherumanal, Johanne R. Trippas, Danula Hettiachchi, Flora D. Salim, Falk Scholer, Damiano Spina
Instruments such as eye-tracking devices have contributed to understanding how users interact with screen-based search engines. However, user-system interactions in audio-only channels -- as is the case for Spoken Conversational Search (SCS) -- are harder to characterize, given the lack of instruments to effectively and precisely capture interactions. Furthermore, in this era of information overload, cognitive bias can significantly impact how we seek and consume information -- especially in the context of controversial topics or multiple viewpoints. This paper draws upon insights from multiple disciplines (including information seeking, psychology, cognitive science, and wearable sensors) to provoke novel conversations in the community. To this end, we discuss future opportunities and propose a framework including multimodal instruments and methods for experimental designs and settings. We demonstrate preliminary results as an example. We also outline the challenges and offer suggestions for adopting this multimodal approach, including ethical considerations, to assist future researchers and practitioners in exploring cognitive biases in SCS.
Read more8/9/2024
0
Listen and Speak Fairly: A Study on Semantic Gender Bias in Speech Integrated Large Language Models
Yi-Cheng Lin, Tzu-Quan Lin, Chih-Kai Yang, Ke-Han Lu, Wei-Chih Chen, Chun-Yi Kuan, Hung-yi Lee
Speech Integrated Large Language Models (SILLMs) combine large language models with speech perception to perform diverse tasks, such as emotion recognition to speaker verification, demonstrating universal audio understanding capability. However, these models may amplify biases present in training data, potentially leading to biased access to information for marginalized groups. This work introduces a curated spoken bias evaluation toolkit and corresponding dataset. We evaluate gender bias in SILLMs across four semantic-related tasks: speech-to-text translation (STT), spoken coreference resolution (SCR), spoken sentence continuation (SSC), and spoken question answering (SQA). Our analysis reveals that bias levels are language-dependent and vary with different evaluation methods. Our findings emphasize the necessity of employing multiple approaches to comprehensively assess biases in SILLMs, providing insights for developing fairer SILLM systems.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Cognitively Biased Users Interacting with Algorithmically Biased Results in Whole-Session Search on Debated Topics
Ben Wang, Jiqun Liu
When interacting with information retrieval (IR) systems, users, affected by confirmation biases, tend to select search results that confirm their existing beliefs on socially significant contentious issues. To understand the judgments and attitude changes of users searching online, our study examined how cognitively biased users interact with algorithmically biased search engine result pages (SERPs). We designed three-query search sessions on debated topics under various bias conditions. We recruited 1,321 crowdsourcing participants and explored their attitude changes, search interactions, and the effects of confirmation bias. Three key findings emerged: 1) most attitude changes occur in the initial query of a search session; 2) Confirmation bias and result presentation on SERPs affect the number and depth of clicks in the current query and perceived familiarity with clicked results in subsequent queries; 3) The bias position also affects attitude changes of users with lower perceived openness to conflicting opinions. Our study goes beyond traditional simulation-based evaluation settings and simulated rational users, sheds light on the mixed effects of human biases and algorithmic biases in information retrieval tasks on debated topics, and can inform the design of bias-aware user models, human-centered bias mitigation techniques, and socially responsible intelligent IR systems.
Read more6/10/2024