Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluation

Read original: arXiv:2409.01941 - Published 9/4/2024 by Jack Krolik, Herprit Mahal, Feroz Ahmad, Gaurav Trivedi, Bahador Saket
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q&A) systems.
  • Traditionally, human evaluation by medical professionals has been essential for assessing the quality of these responses, but it is time-consuming and costly.
  • The study examines whether LLMs can reliably replicate human evaluations, potentially saving valuable time for medical experts.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at using advanced AI language models to automatically assess the quality of answers provided in medical question-and-answer systems. In these systems, patients or others can ask medical questions, and the system provides responses.

Historically, these responses have needed to be evaluated by human medical professionals to ensure they are accurate and helpful. However, this manual review process is slow and expensive. The researchers wanted to see if they could use powerful AI language models to do this evaluation instead, which could save a lot of time for the doctors and nurses.

The results suggest the AI models can do a reasonably good job at imitating human evaluations, at least for simpler medical questions. But more research is still needed to see how well they handle more complex or specialized medical queries.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q&A) systems. Traditionally, human evaluation by medical professionals has been essential for assessing the quality of these responses, but it is time-consuming and costly.

The researchers used a dataset of medical questions derived from patient data to test how well LLMs could replicate human evaluations. They found that the LLMs were able to reliably evaluate the quality of responses, suggesting they could save valuable time for medical experts.

However, the paper notes that the study was limited in scope, and further research is needed to see how well the LLMs perform on more complex or specialized medical questions that were beyond the initial investigation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents promising results, showing that LLMs can be used to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Q&A systems. This could potentially save a significant amount of time and resources for medical professionals who would otherwise need to manually review these responses.

That said, the researchers acknowledge that the study had limitations and that more research is needed, particularly around how well the LLMs can handle more complex or specialized medical queries. There may also be concerns about the reliability and accuracy of using AI systems to evaluate medical information, which could have serious consequences if the assessments are flawed.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or errors that could be present in the LLMs or the dataset of medical questions used in the study. These are important considerations that should be explored further.

Overall, the research is a valuable step forward, but more work is needed to fully understand the capabilities and limitations of using LLMs for medical Q&A evaluation before deploying such systems in real-world healthcare settings.

Conclusion

This paper explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q&A) systems, a crucial task in the field of Natural Language Processing. The findings suggest that LLMs can reliably replicate human evaluations of medical response quality, which could save valuable time for medical experts.

However, the researchers note that further research is needed to address more complex or specialized medical questions that were beyond the scope of this initial investigation. Potential issues around reliability, accuracy, and bias in the LLM assessments also require careful consideration before deploying such systems in real-world healthcare settings.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in using advanced AI language models to enhance the efficiency and scalability of medical Q&A systems, with implications for improving patient care and supporting overburdened healthcare providers.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluation

Jack Krolik, Herprit Mahal, Feroz Ahmad, Gaurav Trivedi, Bahador Saket

This paper explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the evaluation of responses in medical Question and Answer (Q&A) systems, a crucial form of Natural Language Processing. Traditionally, human evaluation has been indispensable for assessing the quality of these responses. However, manual evaluation by medical professionals is time-consuming and costly. Our study examines whether LLMs can reliably replicate human evaluations by using questions derived from patient data, thereby saving valuable time for medical experts. While the findings suggest promising results, further research is needed to address more specific or complex questions that were beyond the scope of this initial investigation.

Read more

9/4/2024

MedREQAL: Examining Medical Knowledge Recall of Large Language Models via Question Answering
Total Score

0

MedREQAL: Examining Medical Knowledge Recall of Large Language Models via Question Answering

Juraj Vladika, Phillip Schneider, Florian Matthes

In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated an impressive ability to encode knowledge during pre-training on large text corpora. They can leverage this knowledge for downstream tasks like question answering (QA), even in complex areas involving health topics. Considering their high potential for facilitating clinical work in the future, understanding the quality of encoded medical knowledge and its recall in LLMs is an important step forward. In this study, we examine the capability of LLMs to exhibit medical knowledge recall by constructing a novel dataset derived from systematic reviews -- studies synthesizing evidence-based answers for specific medical questions. Through experiments on the new MedREQAL dataset, comprising question-answer pairs extracted from rigorous systematic reviews, we assess six LLMs, such as GPT and Mixtral, analyzing their classification and generation performance. Our experimental insights into LLM performance on the novel biomedical QA dataset reveal the still challenging nature of this task.

Read more

6/11/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Evaluating large language models in medical applications: a survey

Xiaolan Chen, Jiayang Xiang, Shanfu Lu, Yexin Liu, Mingguang He, Danli Shi

Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with transformative potential across numerous domains, including healthcare and medicine. In the medical domain, LLMs hold promise for tasks ranging from clinical decision support to patient education. However, evaluating the performance of LLMs in medical contexts presents unique challenges due to the complex and critical nature of medical information. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the landscape of medical LLM evaluation, synthesizing insights from existing studies and highlighting evaluation data sources, task scenarios, and evaluation methods. Additionally, it identifies key challenges and opportunities in medical LLM evaluation, emphasizing the need for continued research and innovation to ensure the responsible integration of LLMs into clinical practice.

Read more

5/14/2024

A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations
Total Score

0

A Survey on Large Language Models from General Purpose to Medical Applications: Datasets, Methodologies, and Evaluations

Jinqiang Wang, Huansheng Ning, Yi Peng, Qikai Wei, Daniel Tesfai, Wenwei Mao, Tao Zhu, Runhe Huang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated surprising performance across various natural language processing tasks. Recently, medical LLMs enhanced with domain-specific knowledge have exhibited excellent capabilities in medical consultation and diagnosis. These models can smoothly simulate doctor-patient dialogues and provide professional medical advice. Most medical LLMs are developed through continued training of open-source general LLMs, which require significantly fewer computational resources than training LLMs from scratch. Additionally, this approach offers better protection of patient privacy compared to API-based solutions. This survey systematically explores how to train medical LLMs based on general LLMs. It covers: (a) how to acquire training corpus and construct customized medical training sets, (b) how to choose a appropriate training paradigm, (c) how to choose a suitable evaluation benchmark, and (d) existing challenges and promising future research directions are discussed. This survey can provide guidance for the development of LLMs focused on various medical applications, such as medical education, diagnostic planning, and clinical assistants.

Read more

6/18/2024