Towards Real-world Video Face Restoration: A New Benchmark
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new benchmark for evaluating video face restoration algorithms in real-world conditions.
- The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of low-quality video footage with challenging real-world degradations, as well as evaluation protocols and metrics tailored to video face restoration.
- The authors conduct comprehensive experiments using state-of-the-art methods, revealing key limitations and areas for future improvement in video face restoration.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new benchmark for evaluating video face restoration techniques. Video face restoration is the process of improving the quality and clarity of faces in low-quality video footage, which is important for applications like video conferencing, surveillance, and entertainment.
The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of real-world video footage with various types of degradation, such as blurriness, compression artifacts, and lighting changes. This is more challenging than the clean, controlled datasets often used to evaluate face restoration methods. The benchmark also includes standardized evaluation protocols and metrics to assess the performance of restoration algorithms in a consistent way.
The authors test several state-of-the-art video face restoration techniques on this benchmark. Their results reveal key limitations of existing methods, such as the inability to handle severe degradations or maintain temporal consistency across frames. This highlights the need for further advancements in this area to enable robust video face restoration in real-world scenarios.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new benchmark called "Towards Real-world Video Face Restoration" to evaluate the performance of video face restoration algorithms in challenging real-world conditions. The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of low-quality video footage with various types of degradation, such as motion blur, compression artifacts, and lighting changes. This is in contrast to many existing face restoration datasets that use clean, controlled video.
The authors also define evaluation protocols and metrics tailored to video face restoration, including both frame-wise and temporal consistency measures. They conduct comprehensive experiments using several state-of-the-art video face restoration methods, including Content-Bias Frechet Video Distance, Beyond Alignment: Blind Video Face Restoration via Depth-Aware Motion Compensation, and Perception-Oriented Video Frame Interpolation via Asymmetric Bilateral Motion Estimation.
The results reveal key limitations of existing methods, such as the inability to handle severe degradations or maintain temporal consistency across frames. The authors also find that methods focusing on single-frame restoration often struggle with video-specific challenges like motion blur and temporal artifacts. This highlights the need for future advancements in video-specific face restoration techniques that can robustly handle the diverse real-world degradations captured in the benchmark.
Critical Analysis
The authors have done a commendable job in designing a challenging and diverse benchmark for video face restoration. By including a wide range of real-world degradations, they have created a more realistic evaluation setting compared to many existing datasets.
However, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific causes of the performance limitations observed for the tested methods. Further analysis of the failure cases and the factors contributing to poor temporal consistency would be helpful to guide future research in this area.
Additionally, the benchmark focuses solely on face restoration, but many real-world video applications may also require the restoration of other scene elements, such as backgrounds or non-facial regions. Expanding the benchmark to include a more holistic video restoration assessment could be a valuable direction for future work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a new benchmark for evaluating video face restoration algorithms in challenging real-world conditions. The benchmark includes a diverse dataset of low-quality video footage with various types of degradation, as well as tailored evaluation protocols and metrics.
The authors' comprehensive experiments reveal key limitations of existing state-of-the-art methods, highlighting the need for further advancements in video-specific face restoration techniques. The benchmark provides a valuable resource for the research community to drive progress in this important field, with the ultimate goal of enabling robust video face restoration for a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Real-world Video Face Restoration: A New Benchmark
Ziyan Chen, Jingwen He, Xinqi Lin, Yu Qiao, Chao Dong
Blind face restoration (BFR) on images has significantly progressed over the last several years, while real-world video face restoration (VFR), which is more challenging for more complex face motions such as moving gaze directions and facial orientations involved, remains unsolved. Typical BFR methods are evaluated on privately synthesized datasets or self-collected real-world low-quality face images, which are limited in their coverage of real-world video frames. In this work, we introduced new real-world datasets named FOS with a taxonomy of Full, Occluded, and Side faces from mainly video frames to study the applicability of current methods on videos. Compared with existing test datasets, FOS datasets cover more diverse degradations and involve face samples from more complex scenarios, which helps to revisit current face restoration approaches more comprehensively. Given the established datasets, we benchmarked both the state-of-the-art BFR methods and the video super resolution (VSR) methods to comprehensively study current approaches, identifying their potential and limitations in VFR tasks. In addition, we studied the effectiveness of the commonly used image quality assessment (IQA) metrics and face IQA (FIQA) metrics by leveraging a subjective user study. With extensive experimental results and detailed analysis provided, we gained insights from the successes and failures of both current BFR and VSR methods. These results also pose challenges to current face restoration approaches, which we hope stimulate future advances in VFR research.
Read more5/7/2024
0
New!Exploring 3D Face Reconstruction and Fusion Methods for Face Verification: A Case-Study in Video Surveillance
Simone Maurizio La Cava, Sara Concas, Ruben Tolosana, Roberto Casula, Giulia Orr`u, Martin Drahansky, Julian Fierrez, Gian Luca Marcialis
3D face reconstruction (3DFR) algorithms are based on specific assumptions tailored to distinct application scenarios. These assumptions limit their use when acquisition conditions, such as the subject's distance from the camera or the camera's characteristics, are different than expected, as typically happens in video surveillance. Additionally, 3DFR algorithms follow various strategies to address the reconstruction of a 3D shape from 2D data, such as statistical model fitting, photometric stereo, or deep learning. In the present study, we explore the application of three 3DFR algorithms representative of the SOTA, employing each one as the template set generator for a face verification system. The scores provided by each system are combined by score-level fusion. We show that the complementarity induced by different 3DFR algorithms improves performance when tests are conducted at never-seen-before distances from the camera and camera characteristics (cross-distance and cross-camera settings), thus encouraging further investigations on multiple 3DFR-based approaches.
Read more9/17/2024
0
DaBiT: Depth and Blur informed Transformer for Joint Refocusing and Super-Resolution
Crispian Morris, Nantheera Anantrasirichai, Fan Zhang, David Bull
In many real-world scenarios, recorded videos suffer from accidental focus blur, and while video deblurring methods exist, most specifically target motion blur. This paper introduces a framework optimised for the joint task of focal deblurring (refocusing) and video super-resolution (VSR). The proposed method employs novel map guided transformers, in addition to image propagation, to effectively leverage the continuous spatial variance of focal blur and restore the footage. We also introduce a flow re-focusing module to efficiently align relevant features between the blurry and sharp domains. Additionally, we propose a novel technique for generating synthetic focal blur data, broadening the model's learning capabilities to include a wider array of content. We have made a new benchmark dataset, DAVIS-Blur, available. This dataset, a modified extension of the popular DAVIS video segmentation set, provides realistic out-of-focus blur degradations as well as the corresponding blur maps. Comprehensive experiments on DAVIS-Blur demonstrate the superiority of our approach. We achieve state-of-the-art results with an average PSNR performance over 1.9dB greater than comparable existing video restoration methods. Our source code will be made available at https://github.com/crispianm/DaBiT
Read more7/11/2024
0
A New Dataset and Framework for Real-World Blurred Images Super-Resolution
Rui Qin, Ming Sun, Chao Zhou, Bin Wang
Recent Blind Image Super-Resolution (BSR) methods have shown proficiency in general images. However, we find that the efficacy of recent methods obviously diminishes when employed on image data with blur, while image data with intentional blur constitute a substantial proportion of general data. To further investigate and address this issue, we developed a new super-resolution dataset specifically tailored for blur images, named the Real-world Blur-kept Super-Resolution (ReBlurSR) dataset, which consists of nearly 3000 defocus and motion blur image samples with diverse blur sizes and varying blur intensities. Furthermore, we propose a new BSR framework for blur images called Perceptual-Blur-adaptive Super-Resolution (PBaSR), which comprises two main modules: the Cross Disentanglement Module (CDM) and the Cross Fusion Module (CFM). The CDM utilizes a dual-branch parallelism to isolate conflicting blur and general data during optimization. The CFM fuses the well-optimized prior from these distinct domains cost-effectively and efficiently based on model interpolation. By integrating these two modules, PBaSR achieves commendable performance on both general and blur data without any additional inference and deployment cost and is generalizable across multiple model architectures. Rich experiments show that PBaSR achieves state-of-the-art performance across various metrics without incurring extra inference costs. Within the widely adopted LPIPS metrics, PBaSR achieves an improvement range of approximately 0.02-0.10 with diverse anchor methods and blur types, across both the ReBlurSR and multiple common general BSR benchmarks. Code here: https://github.com/Imalne/PBaSR.
Read more7/23/2024