ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking Perturbations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper, titled "ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking Perturbations", investigates the robustness of offensive language detection models in the Chinese language.
- The researchers focus on evaluating the effectiveness of "cloaking" techniques, where small perturbations are made to offensive text to bypass detection systems.
- The study aims to provide insights into the weaknesses of current offensive language detection models and inform the development of more robust systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how well AI systems can detect offensive or harmful language in the Chinese language. The researchers tested these AI systems by trying to trick them using a technique called "cloaking". This involves making small changes to offensive words or phrases to see if the AI can still recognize them as harmful.
The goal is to understand the weaknesses of current offensive language detection models so that they can be improved. If an AI system can be easily fooled by small changes to offensive text, then it may not be very effective at actually catching harmful content online. By evaluating the robustness of these AI models, the researchers hope to help develop better systems that are harder to bypass.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a "cloaking" technique called "ToxiCloakCN" that makes small perturbations to Chinese text to evade offensive language detection. They evaluated the effectiveness of this cloaking approach against several state-of-the-art offensive language detection models for the Chinese language.
The cloaking process involved substituting Chinese characters with visually similar characters, reordering characters, or inserting extra characters. The researchers then measured how well the detection models could still identify the text as offensive after these cloaking perturbations were applied.
Their results showed that the cloaking approach was often successful in bypassing the detection models, with the models' performance dropping significantly when faced with the cloaked text. This suggests current Chinese offensive language detectors may not be as robust as desired and can be easily fooled by simple obfuscation techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by rigorously evaluating the robustness of offensive language detection in the Chinese language, an area that has received less attention compared to English. The cloaking techniques used are well-designed and the experimental setup is sound.
However, the paper does not fully explore the broader implications of these findings. For example, it does not discuss how these cloaking techniques might be used maliciously to evade content moderation or what countermeasures could be developed to make detection models more resilient.
Additionally, the paper focuses only on lexical-level perturbations and does not consider more advanced semantic-preserving techniques that could further fool detection systems. Exploring a wider range of cloaking approaches would provide a more comprehensive assessment of model robustness.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution by highlighting the potential vulnerabilities of current Chinese offensive language detection models to simple cloaking techniques. The findings suggest more work is needed to develop robust, adversarially-resilient systems that can reliably identify harmful content, even when it is obfuscated.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more sophisticated detection approaches that are better equipped to handle evolving attempts to bypass content moderation. Continuing to evaluate model robustness in this way is crucial to ensuring the safety and integrity of online discourse.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ToxiCloakCN: Evaluating Robustness of Offensive Language Detection in Chinese with Cloaking Perturbations
Yunze Xiao, Yujia Hu, Kenny Tsu Wei Choo, Roy Ka-wei Lee
Detecting hate speech and offensive language is essential for maintaining a safe and respectful digital environment. This study examines the limitations of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in identifying offensive content within systematically perturbed data, with a focus on Chinese, a language particularly susceptible to such perturbations. We introduce textsf{ToxiCloakCN}, an enhanced dataset derived from ToxiCN, augmented with homophonic substitutions and emoji transformations, to test the robustness of LLMs against these cloaking perturbations. Our findings reveal that existing models significantly underperform in detecting offensive content when these perturbations are applied. We provide an in-depth analysis of how different types of offensive content are affected by these perturbations and explore the alignment between human and model explanations of offensiveness. Our work highlights the urgent need for more advanced techniques in offensive language detection to combat the evolving tactics used to evade detection mechanisms.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Towards Generalized Offensive Language Identification
Alphaeus Dmonte, Tejas Arya, Tharindu Ranasinghe, Marcos Zampieri
The prevalence of offensive content on the internet, encompassing hate speech and cyberbullying, is a pervasive issue worldwide. Consequently, it has garnered significant attention from the machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) communities. As a result, numerous systems have been developed to automatically identify potentially harmful content and mitigate its impact. These systems can follow two approaches; (1) Use publicly available models and application endpoints, including prompting large language models (LLMs) (2) Annotate datasets and train ML models on them. However, both approaches lack an understanding of how generalizable they are. Furthermore, the applicability of these systems is often questioned in off-domain and practical environments. This paper empirically evaluates the generalizability of offensive language detection models and datasets across a novel generalized benchmark. We answer three research questions on generalizability. Our findings will be useful in creating robust real-world offensive language detection systems.
Read more7/29/2024
0
OSPC: Detecting Harmful Memes with Large Language Model as a Catalyst
Jingtao Cao, Zheng Zhang, Hongru Wang, Bin Liang, Hao Wang, Kam-Fai Wong
Memes, which rapidly disseminate personal opinions and positions across the internet, also pose significant challenges in propagating social bias and prejudice. This study presents a novel approach to detecting harmful memes, particularly within the multicultural and multilingual context of Singapore. Our methodology integrates image captioning, Optical Character Recognition (OCR), and Large Language Model (LLM) analysis to comprehensively understand and classify harmful memes. Utilizing the BLIP model for image captioning, PP-OCR and TrOCR for text recognition across multiple languages, and the Qwen LLM for nuanced language understanding, our system is capable of identifying harmful content in memes created in English, Chinese, Malay, and Tamil. To enhance the system's performance, we fine-tuned our approach by leveraging additional data labeled using GPT-4V, aiming to distill the understanding capability of GPT-4V for harmful memes to our system. Our framework achieves top-1 at the public leaderboard of the Online Safety Prize Challenge hosted by AI Singapore, with the AUROC as 0.7749 and accuracy as 0.7087, significantly ahead of the other teams. Notably, our approach outperforms previous benchmarks, with FLAVA achieving an AUROC of 0.5695 and VisualBERT an AUROC of 0.5561.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Navigating the Shadows: Unveiling Effective Disturbances for Modern AI Content Detectors
Ying Zhou, Ben He, Le Sun
With the launch of ChatGPT, large language models (LLMs) have attracted global attention. In the realm of article writing, LLMs have witnessed extensive utilization, giving rise to concerns related to intellectual property protection, personal privacy, and academic integrity. In response, AI-text detection has emerged to distinguish between human and machine-generated content. However, recent research indicates that these detection systems often lack robustness and struggle to effectively differentiate perturbed texts. Currently, there is a lack of systematic evaluations regarding detection performance in real-world applications, and a comprehensive examination of perturbation techniques and detector robustness is also absent. To bridge this gap, our work simulates real-world scenarios in both informal and professional writing, exploring the out-of-the-box performance of current detectors. Additionally, we have constructed 12 black-box text perturbation methods to assess the robustness of current detection models across various perturbation granularities. Furthermore, through adversarial learning experiments, we investigate the impact of perturbation data augmentation on the robustness of AI-text detectors. We have released our code and data at https://github.com/zhouying20/ai-text-detector-evaluation.
Read more6/14/2024