On Tractable $Phi$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games

Read original: arXiv:2403.08171 - Published 7/4/2024 by Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, Haipeng Luo, Chen-Yu Wei, Weiqiang Zheng
Total Score

0

On Tractable $Phi$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Proposes a new concept called "(ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium" to address challenges in finding tractable equilibria in non-concave games
  • Provides a framework for analyzing local equilibria and proving their existence and stability
  • Demonstrates the applicability of the approach to several game theory models, including Cournot competition and Colonel Blotto games

Plain English Explanation

This research paper introduces a new way to analyze and find stable equilibria in complex, non-concave games. Non-concave games are situations where the payoffs or rewards for players are not straightforward to calculate, making it challenging to determine the best strategies.

The key idea is the concept of a "(ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium," which relaxes the strict requirements of a traditional Nash equilibrium. Instead of needing to find a global optimum, the researchers show it is often possible to find a "good enough" local equilibrium that is stable and tractable to compute.

This approach allows the researchers to analyze a wider range of real-world strategic interactions, such as Cournot competition and Colonel Blotto games, where the payoffs are non-concave. By relaxing the strict equilibrium conditions, they can provide a framework for finding solutions that are practically useful, even if they are not perfectly optimal.

The paper demonstrates the applicability of this new concept through several examples, showing how it can be used to analyze and understand complex strategic scenarios that were previously difficult to model. This opens up new possibilities for applying game theory to a broader range of problems in economics, politics, and other domains.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of a "(ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium" as a way to analyze local stability and existence of equilibria in non-concave games. This relaxes the strict requirements of a traditional Nash equilibrium, which can be challenging to find in complex, non-concave settings.

The researchers provide a general framework for analyzing local equilibria, including conditions for their existence and stability. They then demonstrate the applicability of this approach to several game theory models, such as Cournot competition and Colonel Blotto games.

For example, in the Cournot competition model, the researchers show that a (ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium can be found efficiently, even though the game is non-concave. This allows them to characterize the stable strategies for firms competing in a market, without needing to find the global optimum.

Similarly, for Colonel Blotto games, the researchers prove the existence and stability of (ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibria, which provides a way to analyze these complex strategic interactions in a tractable manner.

Critical Analysis

The paper introduces a novel and promising approach to analyzing equilibria in non-concave games, which are common in many real-world strategic scenarios. By relaxing the strict requirements of a Nash equilibrium, the (ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium concept provides a more flexible and practical framework for finding stable solutions.

One potential limitation is that the proposed equilibrium concept is still a form of local optimum, which means it may not be globally optimal. The researchers acknowledge this and suggest that the approach can be combined with other techniques, such as polynomial-time approximation schemes, to improve the quality of the solutions.

Additionally, the paper focuses on establishing the theoretical foundations of the (ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium, but does not provide extensive empirical evaluations or applications to real-world case studies. Further research could explore the practical implications and limitations of this approach in diverse domains.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in addressing the challenges of finding tractable equilibria in complex, non-concave games. The proposed framework opens up new possibilities for applying game theory to a wider range of strategic interactions, with potentially significant implications for fields like economics, political science, and beyond.

Conclusion

This research paper introduces a new concept called the "(ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibrium" as a way to analyze and find stable equilibria in non-concave games. By relaxing the strict requirements of a traditional Nash equilibrium, the researchers provide a more flexible and tractable framework for modeling complex strategic interactions.

The paper demonstrates the applicability of this approach to several game theory models, including Cournot competition and Colonel Blotto games, showing how (ε,Φ(δ))-Local Equilibria can be efficiently computed and analyzed. This represents an important advance in the field, as it allows researchers and practitioners to apply game theory to a broader range of real-world problems where the payoffs or rewards are non-concave and difficult to optimize globally.

While the proposed concept still has some limitations, such as the potential for suboptimal local optima, the researchers suggest ways to combine it with other techniques to improve the quality of solutions. Overall, this work opens up new possibilities for using game theory to understand and predict the behavior of strategic actors in a wide range of domains, from economics and politics to social interactions and beyond.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On Tractable $Phi$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games
Total Score

0

On Tractable $Phi$-Equilibria in Non-Concave Games

Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, Haipeng Luo, Chen-Yu Wei, Weiqiang Zheng

While Online Gradient Descent and other no-regret learning procedures are known to efficiently converge to a coarse correlated equilibrium in games where each agent's utility is concave in their own strategy, this is not the case when utilities are non-concave -- a common scenario in machine learning applications involving strategies parameterized by deep neural networks, or when agents' utilities are computed by neural networks, or both. Non-concave games introduce significant game-theoretic and optimization challenges: (i) Nash equilibria may not exist; (ii) local Nash equilibria, though existing, are intractable; and (iii) mixed Nash, correlated, and coarse correlated equilibria generally have infinite support and are intractable. To sidestep these challenges, we revisit the classical solution concept of $Phi$-equilibria introduced by Greenwald and Jafari [2003], which is guaranteed to exist for an arbitrary set of strategy modifications $Phi$ even in non-concave games [Stoltz and Lugosi, 2007]. However, the tractability of $Phi$-equilibria in such games remains elusive. In this paper, we initiate the study of tractable $Phi$-equilibria in non-concave games and examine several natural families of strategy modifications. We show that when $Phi$ is finite, there exists an efficient uncoupled learning algorithm that converges to the corresponding $Phi$-equilibria. Additionally, we explore cases where $Phi$ is infinite but consists of local modifications, showing that Online Gradient Descent can efficiently approximate $Phi$-equilibria in non-trivial regimes.

Read more

7/4/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Smooth Nash Equilibria: Algorithms and Complexity

Constantinos Daskalakis, Noah Golowich, Nika Haghtalab, Abhishek Shetty

A fundamental shortcoming of the concept of Nash equilibrium is its computational intractability: approximating Nash equilibria in normal-form games is PPAD-hard. In this paper, inspired by the ideas of smoothed analysis, we introduce a relaxed variant of Nash equilibrium called $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibrium, for a smoothness parameter $sigma$. In a $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibrium, players only need to achieve utility at least as high as their best deviation to a $sigma$-smooth strategy, which is a distribution that does not put too much mass (as parametrized by $sigma$) on any fixed action. We distinguish two variants of $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibria: strong $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibria, in which players are required to play $sigma$-smooth strategies under equilibrium play, and weak $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibria, where there is no such requirement. We show that both weak and strong $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibria have superior computational properties to Nash equilibria: when $sigma$ as well as an approximation parameter $epsilon$ and the number of players are all constants, there is a constant-time randomized algorithm to find a weak $epsilon$-approximate $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibrium in normal-form games. In the same parameter regime, there is a polynomial-time deterministic algorithm to find a strong $epsilon$-approximate $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibrium in a normal-form game. These results stand in contrast to the optimal algorithm for computing $epsilon$-approximate Nash equilibria, which cannot run in faster than quasipolynomial-time. We complement our upper bounds by showing that when either $sigma$ or $epsilon$ is an inverse polynomial, finding a weak $epsilon$-approximate $sigma$-smooth Nash equilibria becomes computationally intractable.

Read more

7/23/2024

Joint-perturbation simultaneous pseudo-gradient
Total Score

0

Joint-perturbation simultaneous pseudo-gradient

Carlos Martin, Tuomas Sandholm

We study the problem of computing an approximate Nash equilibrium of a game whose strategy space is continuous without access to gradients of the utility function. Such games arise, for example, when players' strategies are represented by the parameters of a neural network. Lack of access to gradients is common in reinforcement learning settings, where the environment is treated as a black box, as well as equilibrium finding in mechanisms such as auctions, where the mechanism's payoffs are discontinuous in the players' actions. To tackle this problem, we turn to zeroth-order optimization techniques that combine pseudo-gradients with equilibrium-finding dynamics. Specifically, we introduce a new technique that requires a number of utility function evaluations per iteration that is constant rather than linear in the number of players. It achieves this by performing a single joint perturbation on all players' strategies, rather than perturbing each one individually. This yields a dramatic improvement for many-player games, especially when the utility function is expensive to compute in terms of wall time, memory, money, or other resources. We evaluate our approach on various games, including auctions, which have important real-world applications. Our approach yields a significant reduction in the run time required to reach an approximate Nash equilibrium.

Read more

8/20/2024

Learning to Control Unknown Strongly Monotone Games
Total Score

0

Learning to Control Unknown Strongly Monotone Games

Siddharth Chandak, Ilai Bistritz, Nicholas Bambos

Consider $N$ players each with a $d$-dimensional action set. Each of the players' utility functions includes their reward function and a linear term for each dimension, with coefficients that are controlled by the manager. We assume that the game is strongly monotone, so if each player runs gradient descent, the dynamics converge to a unique Nash equilibrium (NE). The NE is typically inefficient in terms of global performance. The resulting global performance of the system can be improved by imposing $K$-dimensional linear constraints on the NE. We therefore want the manager to pick the controlled coefficients that impose the desired constraint on the NE. However, this requires knowing the players' reward functions and their action sets. Obtaining this game structure information is infeasible in a large-scale network and violates the users' privacy. To overcome this, we propose a simple algorithm that learns to shift the NE of the game to meet the linear constraints by adjusting the controlled coefficients online. Our algorithm only requires the linear constraints violation as feedback and does not need to know the reward functions or the action sets. We prove that our algorithm, which is based on two time-scale stochastic approximation, guarantees convergence with probability 1 to the set of NE that meet target linear constraints. We then provide a mean square convergence rate of $O(t^{-1/4})$ for our algorithm. This is the first such bound for two time-scale stochastic approximation where the slower time-scale is a fixed point iteration with a non-expansive mapping. We demonstrate how our scheme can be applied to optimizing a global quadratic cost at NE and load balancing in resource allocation games. We provide simulations of our algorithm for these scenarios.

Read more

7/2/2024