Training on the Edge of Stability Is Caused by Layerwise Jacobian Alignment
2406.00127
0
0
Abstract
During neural network training, the sharpness of the Hessian matrix of the training loss rises until training is on the edge of stability. As a result, even nonstochastic gradient descent does not accurately model the underlying dynamical system defined by the gradient flow of the training loss. We use an exponential Euler solver to train the network without entering the edge of stability, so that we accurately approximate the true gradient descent dynamics. We demonstrate experimentally that the increase in the sharpness of the Hessian matrix is caused by the layerwise Jacobian matrices of the network becoming aligned, so that a small change in the network preactivations near the inputs of the network can cause a large change in the outputs of the network. We further demonstrate that the degree of alignment scales with the size of the dataset by a power law with a coefficient of determination between 0.74 and 0.98.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines the phenomenon of "training on the edge of stability" in deep neural networks
- Proposes that this behavior is caused by layerwise Jacobian alignment, a property where the Jacobian matrices of each layer become aligned during training
- Provides both theoretical and empirical analysis to support this claim
- Suggests that this alignment is a consequence of the dynamics of gradient descent optimization and the implicit regularization of deep linear networks
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a curious behavior that arises when training deep neural networks - the tendency for the network to learn on the "edge of stability." This means the network finds a solution that is barely stable, teetering on the brink of becoming unstable. The researchers propose that this happens because the Jacobian matrices of each layer in the network gradually become aligned with each other during training.
To understand this, imagine a set of dominoes standing upright. If they are all perfectly aligned, a small push on the first one will cause the entire row to topple. This is similar to what happens in a deep neural network - the alignment of the Jacobian matrices makes the network very sensitive to small changes, keeping it balanced on the edge of stability.
The researchers provide both mathematical analysis and experimental evidence to support their theory. They show that this Jacobian alignment is a natural consequence of the gradient descent optimization algorithm and the implicit regularization that occurs in deep linear networks.
This research helps explain an important phenomenon in deep learning and may have implications for how we can design more stable and robust neural networks. By understanding the dynamics underlying "edge of stability" training, we may be able to develop new techniques to push neural networks away from this precarious state and towards more reliable and predictable performance.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates the phenomenon of "training on the edge of stability" in deep neural networks, where the network learns a solution that is barely stable and can easily become unstable. The researchers propose that this behavior is caused by layerwise Jacobian alignment, a property where the Jacobian matrices of each layer in the network become aligned with each other during the training process.
Mathematically, the Jacobian matrix captures the sensitivity of a function's outputs to changes in its inputs. In a deep neural network, the Jacobian matrices of each layer describe how changes in the inputs of that layer affect the outputs. The researchers show that as training progresses, these Jacobian matrices become increasingly aligned, meaning their directions become more similar.
This alignment makes the network very sensitive to small perturbations, as a change in the input can be amplified through the aligned Jacobian matrices, causing the network to become unstable. The researchers demonstrate this phenomenon both theoretically, by analyzing the dynamics of gradient descent optimization, and empirically, through experiments on various neural network architectures.
The paper also explores the connection between Jacobian alignment and the implicit regularization that occurs in deep linear networks. They show that this alignment is a natural consequence of the dynamics of gradient descent and the inherent regularization properties of deep linear networks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling explanation for the "edge of stability" phenomenon observed in deep neural network training. By focusing on the alignment of the Jacobian matrices, the researchers offer a principled, mathematical account of this behavior. The theoretical analysis is rigorous and the experimental results lend strong support to their claims.
However, the paper does not fully address the implications of this Jacobian alignment for the broader field of deep learning. While the authors discuss potential connections to sharpness-aware minimization and adaptive gradient methods, more work is needed to understand how this insight can be leveraged to improve the training and robustness of neural networks.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on deep linear networks, which may limit the generalizability of their findings to more complex, nonlinear architectures. Further research is needed to explore the Jacobian alignment phenomenon in a wider range of network types and architectures.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding the dynamics of deep neural network training. By shedding light on the role of Jacobian alignment, it opens up new avenues for developing more stable and reliable deep learning models.
Conclusion
This paper provides a novel explanation for the phenomenon of "training on the edge of stability" in deep neural networks. The researchers demonstrate that this behavior is caused by the alignment of the Jacobian matrices of each layer in the network, a property that arises naturally from the dynamics of gradient descent optimization and the implicit regularization present in deep linear networks.
By elucidating the mathematical mechanisms underlying this edge-of-stability training, the paper offers valuable insights that could inform the development of more robust and stable deep learning models. While further research is needed to fully explore the implications of this work, it represents an important step forward in our understanding of the complex dynamics at play in deep neural network training.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
High dimensional analysis reveals conservative sharpening and a stochastic edge of stability
Atish Agarwala, Jeffrey Pennington
0
0
Recent empirical and theoretical work has shown that the dynamics of the large eigenvalues of the training loss Hessian have some remarkably robust features across models and datasets in the full batch regime. There is often an early period of progressive sharpening where the large eigenvalues increase, followed by stabilization at a predictable value known as the edge of stability. Previous work showed that in the stochastic setting, the eigenvalues increase more slowly - a phenomenon we call conservative sharpening. We provide a theoretical analysis of a simple high-dimensional model which shows the origin of this slowdown. We also show that there is an alternative stochastic edge of stability which arises at small batch size that is sensitive to the trace of the Neural Tangent Kernel rather than the large Hessian eigenvalues. We conduct an experimental study which highlights the qualitative differences from the full batch phenomenology, and suggests that controlling the stochastic edge of stability can help optimization.
5/1/2024
Sharpness-Aware Minimization and the Edge of Stability
Philip M. Long, Peter L. Bartlett
0
0
Recent experiments have shown that, often, when training a neural network with gradient descent (GD) with a step size $eta$, the operator norm of the Hessian of the loss grows until it approximately reaches $2/eta$, after which it fluctuates around this value. The quantity $2/eta$ has been called the edge of stability based on consideration of a local quadratic approximation of the loss. We perform a similar calculation to arrive at an edge of stability for Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), a variant of GD which has been shown to improve its generalization. Unlike the case for GD, the resulting SAM-edge depends on the norm of the gradient. Using three deep learning training tasks, we see empirically that SAM operates on the edge of stability identified by this analysis.
4/10/2024
On the weight dynamics of learning networks
Nahal Sharafi, Christoph Martin, Sarah Hallerberg
0
0
Neural networks have become a widely adopted tool for tackling a variety of problems in machine learning and artificial intelligence. In this contribution we use the mathematical framework of local stability analysis to gain a deeper understanding of the learning dynamics of feed forward neural networks. Therefore, we derive equations for the tangent operator of the learning dynamics of three-layer networks learning regression tasks. The results are valid for an arbitrary numbers of nodes and arbitrary choices of activation functions. Applying the results to a network learning a regression task, we investigate numerically, how stability indicators relate to the final training-loss. Although the specific results vary with different choices of initial conditions and activation functions, we demonstrate that it is possible to predict the final training loss, by monitoring finite-time Lyapunov exponents or covariant Lyapunov vectors during the training process.
5/3/2024
🎯
Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stability
Jeremy M. Cohen, Behrooz Ghorbani, Shankar Krishnan, Naman Agarwal, Sourabh Medapati, Michal Badura, Daniel Suo, David Cardoze, Zachary Nado, George E. Dahl, Justin Gilmer
0
0
Very little is known about the training dynamics of adaptive gradient methods like Adam in deep learning. In this paper, we shed light on the behavior of these algorithms in the full-batch and sufficiently large batch settings. Specifically, we empirically demonstrate that during full-batch training, the maximum eigenvalue of the preconditioned Hessian typically equilibrates at a certain numerical value -- the stability threshold of a gradient descent algorithm. For Adam with step size $eta$ and $beta_1 = 0.9$, this stability threshold is $38/eta$. Similar effects occur during minibatch training, especially as the batch size grows. Yet, even though adaptive methods train at the ``Adaptive Edge of Stability'' (AEoS), their behavior in this regime differs in a significant way from that of non-adaptive methods at the EoS. Whereas non-adaptive algorithms at the EoS are blocked from entering high-curvature regions of the loss landscape, adaptive gradient methods at the AEoS can keep advancing into high-curvature regions, while adapting the preconditioner to compensate. Our findings can serve as a foundation for the community's future understanding of adaptive gradient methods in deep learning.
4/17/2024