Training Through Failure: Effects of Data Consistency in Parallel Machine Learning Training
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the effects of data consistency on parallel machine learning training
- Explores how different levels of data consistency impact the performance and convergence of machine learning models
- Proposes a framework for understanding the tradeoffs between data consistency and training efficiency
Plain English Explanation
This paper investigates the impact of data consistency on the training of machine learning models in a parallel computing environment. When training machine learning models, it's important to ensure that the training data is consistent and accurate. However, in a parallel setup where multiple computers are working together, maintaining perfect data consistency can be challenging and can impact the efficiency of the training process.
The researchers explored different levels of data consistency, ranging from strict consistency where all training data is perfectly aligned, to more relaxed consistency models where there may be some discrepancies in the data seen by different machines. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ravnest-decentralized-asynchronous-training-heterogeneous-devices">They looked at the tradeoffs between data consistency and training efficiency</a>, and how this balance affects the performance and convergence of the final machine learning model.
By understanding these tradeoffs, the researchers aim to help machine learning practitioners make more informed decisions about the appropriate level of data consistency to use in their parallel training setups, based on their specific needs and constraints. This can lead to more efficient and effective training of large-scale machine learning models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a framework for understanding the effects of data consistency on parallel machine learning training. The researchers consider three levels of data consistency:
- Strict Consistency: All training data is perfectly aligned and consistent across all machines.
- Relaxed Consistency: There may be some discrepancies in the data seen by different machines, but these discrepancies are bounded.
- Eventual Consistency: There are no guarantees about the consistency of the data, and discrepancies may be unbounded.
The researchers then analyze how these different consistency levels impact the convergence and performance of the trained machine learning models. They develop theoretical bounds and analyze the tradeoffs between data consistency and training efficiency.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/scale-robust-timely-asynchronous-decentralized-learning">The paper also proposes a practical framework for implementing these different consistency levels in parallel training setups</a>, and evaluates the approach on several benchmark machine learning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of data consistency in parallel machine learning training. The theoretical analysis and the proposed framework offer a systematic way to reason about the tradeoffs between data consistency and training efficiency.
However, the paper also acknowledges some limitations. The analysis assumes certain simplifying assumptions, such as convex optimization problems and specific noise models. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/efficient-data-parallel-continual-learning-asynchronous-distributed">In real-world scenarios, these assumptions may not always hold, and further research is needed to understand the performance of the proposed approach in more complex settings</a>.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the impact of different consistency levels on the generalization performance of the trained models. It would be interesting to see how data consistency affects the ability of the models to perform well on unseen data, which is a crucial aspect of machine learning.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/improving-data-aware-parameter-aware-robustness-continual">Finally, the paper does not address fault-tolerance and robustness to failures in the parallel training setup, which are important considerations in real-world deployments</a>. Exploring these aspects could further enhance the practical applicability of the proposed framework.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable framework for understanding the effects of data consistency on parallel machine learning training. By exploring different levels of data consistency and their tradeoffs, the researchers offer insights that can help machine learning practitioners make more informed decisions about their parallel training setups.
The findings have implications for the design and deployment of large-scale machine learning systems, where maintaining data consistency and training efficiency are critical challenges. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/fault-tolerant-ml-efficient-meta-aggregation-synchronous">Further research in this direction can lead to more robust and scalable machine learning solutions that can handle the complexities of real-world data and computing environments</a>.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Training Through Failure: Effects of Data Consistency in Parallel Machine Learning Training
Ray Cao, Sherry Luo, Steve Gan, Sujeeth Jinesh
In this study, we explore the impact of relaxing data consistency in parallel machine learning training during a failure using various parameter server configurations. Our failure recovery strategies include traditional checkpointing, chain replication (which ensures a backup server takes over in case of failure), and a novel stateless parameter server approach. In the stateless approach, workers continue generating gradient updates even if the parameter server is down, applying these updates once the server is back online. We compare these techniques to a standard checkpointing approach, where the training job is resumed from the latest checkpoint. To assess the resilience and performance of each configuration, we intentionally killed the parameter server during training for each experiment. Our experiment results indicate that the stateless parameter server approach continues to train towards convergence and improves accuracy as much as 10% in the face of a failure despite using stale weights and gradients. The chain replication and checkpointing techniques demonstrate convergence but suffer from setbacks in accuracy due to restarting from old checkpoints. These results suggest that allowing workers to continue generating updates during server downtime and applying these updates later can effectively improve hardware utilization. Furthermore, despite higher resource usage, the stateless parameter server method incurs similar monetary costs in terms of hardware usage compared to standard checkpointing methods due to the pricing structure of common cloud providers.
Read more6/11/2024
0
DataStates-LLM: Lazy Asynchronous Checkpointing for Large Language Models
Avinash Maurya, Robert Underwood, M. Mustafa Rafique, Franck Cappello, Bogdan Nicolae
LLMs have seen rapid adoption in all domains. They need to be trained on high-end high-performance computing (HPC) infrastructures and ingest massive amounts of input data. Unsurprisingly, at such a large scale, unexpected events (e.g., failures of components, instability of the software, undesirable learning patterns, etc.), are frequent and typically impact the training in a negative fashion. Thus, LLMs need to be checkpointed frequently so that they can be rolled back to a stable state and subsequently fine-tuned. However, given the large sizes of LLMs, a straightforward checkpointing solution that directly writes the model parameters and optimizer state to persistent storage (e.g., a parallel file system), incurs significant I/O overheads. To address this challenge, in this paper we study how to reduce the I/O overheads for enabling fast and scalable checkpointing for LLMs that can be applied at high frequency (up to the granularity of individual iterations) without significant impact on the training process. Specifically, we introduce a lazy asynchronous multi-level approach that takes advantage of the fact that the tensors making up the model and optimizer state shards remain immutable for extended periods of time, which makes it possible to copy their content in the background with minimal interference during the training process. We evaluate our approach at scales of up to 180 GPUs using different model sizes, parallelism settings, and checkpointing frequencies. The results show up to 48$times$ faster checkpointing and 2.2$times$ faster end-to-end training runtime compared with the state-of-art checkpointing approaches.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Universal Checkpointing: Efficient and Flexible Checkpointing for Large Scale Distributed Training
Xinyu Lian, Sam Ade Jacobs, Lev Kurilenko, Masahiro Tanaka, Stas Bekman, Olatunji Ruwase, Minjia Zhang
Existing checkpointing approaches seem ill-suited for distributed training even though hardware limitations make model parallelism, i.e., sharding model state across multiple accelerators, a requirement for model scaling. Consolidating distributed model state into a single checkpoint unacceptably slows down training, and is impractical at extreme scales. Distributed checkpoints, in contrast, are tightly coupled to the model parallelism and hardware configurations of the training run, and thus unusable on different configurations. To address this problem, we propose Universal Checkpointing, a technique that enables efficient checkpoint creation while providing the flexibility of resuming on arbitrary parallelism strategy and hardware configurations. Universal Checkpointing unlocks unprecedented capabilities for large-scale training such as improved resilience to hardware failures through continued training on remaining healthy hardware, and reduced training time through opportunistic exploitation of elastic capacity. The key insight of Universal Checkpointing is the selection of the optimal representation in each phase of the checkpointing life cycle: distributed representation for saving, and consolidated representation for loading. This is achieved using two key mechanisms. First, the universal checkpoint format, which consists of a consolidated representation of each model parameter and metadata for mapping parameter fragments into training ranks of arbitrary model-parallelism configuration. Second, the universal checkpoint language, a simple but powerful specification language for converting distributed checkpoints into the universal checkpoint format. Our evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness and generality of Universal Checkpointing on state-of-the-art model architectures and a wide range of parallelism techniques.
Read more7/1/2024
0
Towards Fault-Tolerant Hybrid-Parallel Training at Scale with Reliable and Efficient In-memory Checkpointing
Yuxin Wang, Xueze Kang, Shaohuai Shi, Xin He, Zhenheng Tang, Xinglin Pan, Yang Zheng, Xiaoyu Wu, Amelie Chi Zhou, Bingsheng He, Xiaowen Chu
To efficiently scale large model (LM) training, researchers transition from data parallelism (DP) to hybrid parallelism (HP) on GPU clusters, which frequently experience hardware and software failures. Existing works introduce in-memory checkpointing optimizations that snapshot parameters to device memory for rapid failure recovery. However, these methods introduce severe resource competition between checkpointing and training, which can work under DP but can hardly scale under resource-intensive HP. To ensure low checkpointing overhead for hybrid-parallel training, this paper introduces a distributed in-memory checkpointing system with near-zero in-memory saving overhead. It strives from two aspects to mitigate the on-host resource competition caused by in-memory checkpointing: (1) It introduces Hierarchical Asynchronous Snapshotting Coordination in the checkpoint saving stage. This approach uses three-level asynchronous on-device scheduling to enhance parallelism between snapshotting and training, thereby minimizing snapshotting overhead. (2) It proposes Hybrid In-memory Checkpoint Protection to enhance checkpoint completeness during hardware failures. Unlike methods that require inter-node communications, which may block training under HP, it creates intra-node redundancy with efficient resource utilization, protecting training against hardware failures with minimal overhead. With these methods, this work enables fast restart for failed HP training with Distributed In-memory Checkpoint Loading, bypassing inefficiencies in NFS reads. In our evaluation, we achieve zero in-memory checkpoint saving overhead on Frontier while training Llama-2-34B on 256 MI250X devices (512 GPUs).
Read more8/20/2024