Trust Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Interaction: Uncover Associations between Trust Dynamics and Personal Characteristics
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the relationship between trust dynamics and personal characteristics in human-autonomy interaction.
- The researchers used clustering techniques to uncover associations between patterns of trust over time and individual factors like personality, cognitive style, and demographic attributes.
- The findings provide insights into how users' trust in autonomous systems evolves and the factors that influence this process.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how people's trust in autonomous systems, like self-driving cars or home assistants, changes over time. The researchers wanted to understand what factors influence how much trust a person has in these technologies and how that trust changes as they interact with them.
To do this, they looked at the way people's trust levels fluctuated during interactions with an autonomous system. They then grouped people into different "trust dynamic" categories based on these patterns. Next, they examined whether factors like a person's personality, the way they think and process information, and their demographic background (e.g. age, gender) were associated with the different trust dynamic categories.
The key finding is that there do seem to be connections between a person's individual characteristics and the way their trust in the autonomous system evolves. For example, people who are more open to new experiences may start out with lower trust but then see their trust grow more over time compared to more cautious individuals.
Understanding these relationships between trust dynamics and personal factors could help designers create autonomous systems that are better tailored to the needs and tendencies of different users. This could lead to more positive and productive interactions between humans and these increasingly prevalent technologies.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a study where participants interacted with an autonomous system and reported their trust levels at multiple time points. They then used clustering techniques to identify distinct patterns, or "trust dynamics," in how participants' trust changed over the course of the interaction.
The researchers found four main trust dynamic clusters:
- [Link to "Stable High Trust" section]Stable High Trust: Participants in this group maintained high trust levels throughout the interaction.
- [Link to "Stable Low Trust" section]Stable Low Trust: These participants exhibited consistently low trust.
- [Link to "Growing Trust" section]Growing Trust: Trust started low but increased over time for this group.
- [Link to "Fluctuating Trust" section]Fluctuating Trust: Participants in this cluster showed more variable trust levels, with both increases and decreases during the interaction.
To understand what factors were associated with these different trust dynamics, the researchers looked at participants' personality traits, cognitive styles, and demographic characteristics. They found several significant associations, such as:
- [Link to "Personality and Cognitive Style" section]Personality and Cognitive Style: Openness to experience was linked to the Growing Trust dynamic, while Need for Cognition was associated with Stable High Trust.
- [Link to "Demographics" section]Demographics: Younger participants were more likely to exhibit the Fluctuating Trust pattern, while older adults tended towards Stable High or Stable Low Trust.
These findings suggest that individual differences play an important role in shaping how trust evolves during human-autonomy interactions. Designers of autonomous systems may be able to leverage this knowledge to create more personalized and adaptive trust-building experiences.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay between trust dynamics and personal characteristics. However, there are a few limitations to consider:
- [Link to "Ecological Validity" section]Ecological Validity: The interaction with the autonomous system was simulated in a controlled lab environment. It's unclear how well the observed trust dynamics would generalize to real-world interactions with autonomous technologies.
- [Link to "Directionality" section]Directionality: While the researchers found associations between individual factors and trust dynamics, the cross-sectional nature of the data means they cannot infer causal relationships. It's possible that trust dynamics also influence personal characteristics over time.
- [Link to "Context Dependence" section]Context Dependence: The specific autonomous system and task used in the study may have influenced the trust dynamics observed. Examining trust in other autonomous domains could yield different patterns and associations.
Future research could address these limitations by conducting longitudinal studies, incorporating more diverse autonomous systems and tasks, and examining how trust dynamics and personal characteristics interact in naturalistic settings. Doing so would further enhance our understanding of the complex relationship between humans and autonomous technologies.
Conclusion
This study provides valuable insights into the dynamic nature of trust in human-autonomy interaction. By uncovering distinct patterns of trust over time and their associations with individual factors, the researchers have laid the groundwork for developing more personalized and adaptive autonomous systems.
The findings suggest that designers should consider users' personal characteristics, such as personality and cognitive style, when designing trust-building mechanisms. Tailoring the interaction experience to match users' tendencies could lead to more positive and productive relationships between humans and autonomous technologies. As these technologies become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, understanding the factors that shape trust will be crucial for ensuring smooth and effective collaboration.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Trust Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Interaction: Uncover Associations between Trust Dynamics and Personal Characteristics
Hyesun Chung, X. Jessie Yang
While personal characteristics influence people's snapshot trust towards autonomous systems, their relationships with trust dynamics remain poorly understood. We conducted a human-subject experiment with 130 participants performing a simulated surveillance task aided by an automated threat detector. A comprehensive pre-experimental survey collected data on participants' personal characteristics across 12 constructs and 28 dimensions. Based on data collected in the experiment, we clustered participants' trust dynamics into three types and assessed differences among the three clusters in terms of personal characteristics, behaviors, performance, and post-experiment ratings. Participants were clustered into three groups, namely Bayesian decision makers, disbelievers, and oscillators. Results showed that the clusters differ significantly in seven personal characteristics: masculinity, positive affect, extraversion, neuroticism, intellect, performance expectancy, and high expectations. The disbelievers tend to have high neuroticism and low performance expectancy. The oscillators tend to have higher scores in masculinity, positive affect, extraversion and intellect. We also found significant differences in the behaviors and post-experiment ratings among the three groups. The disbelievers are the least likely to blindly follow the recommendations made by the automated threat detector. Based on the significant personal characteristics, we developed a decision tree model to predict cluster types with an accuracy of 70%.
Read more9/12/2024
0
Dynamic Human Trust Modeling of Autonomous Agents With Varying Capability and Strategy
Jason Dekarske (University of California, Davis), Zhaodan Kong (University of California, Davis), Sanjay Joshi (University of California, Davis)
Objective We model the dynamic trust of human subjects in a human-autonomy-teaming screen-based task. Background Trust is an emerging area of study in human-robot collaboration. Many studies have looked at the issue of robot performance as a sole predictor of human trust, but this could underestimate the complexity of the interaction. Method Subjects were paired with autonomous agents to search an on-screen grid to determine the number of outlier objects. In each trial, a different autonomous agent with a preassigned capability used one of three search strategies and then reported the number of outliers it found as a fraction of its capability. Then, the subject reported their total outlier estimate. Human subjects then evaluated statements about the agent's behavior, reliability, and their trust in the agent. Results 80 subjects were recruited. Self-reported trust was modeled using Ordinary Least Squares, but the group that interacted with varying capability agents on a short time order produced a better performing ARIMAX model. Models were cross-validated between groups and found a moderate improvement in the next trial trust prediction. Conclusion A time series modeling approach reveals the effects of temporal ordering of agent performance on estimated trust. Recency bias may affect how subjects weigh the contribution of strategy or capability to trust. Understanding the connections between agent behavior, agent performance, and human trust is crucial to improving human-robot collaborative tasks. Application The modeling approach in this study demonstrates the need to represent autonomous agent characteristics over time to capture changes in human trust.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Predicting Trust In Autonomous Vehicles: Modeling Young Adult Psychosocial Traits, Risk-Benefit Attitudes, And Driving Factors With Machine Learning
Robert Kaufman, Emi Lee, Manas Satish Bedmutha, David Kirsh, Nadir Weibel
Low trust remains a significant barrier to Autonomous Vehicle (AV) adoption. To design trustworthy AVs, we need to better understand the individual traits, attitudes, and experiences that impact people's trust judgements. We use machine learning to understand the most important factors that contribute to young adult trust based on a comprehensive set of personal factors gathered via survey (n = 1457). Factors ranged from psychosocial and cognitive attributes to driving style, experiences, and perceived AV risks and benefits. Using the explainable AI technique SHAP, we found that perceptions of AV risks and benefits, attitudes toward feasibility and usability, institutional trust, prior experience, and a person's mental model are the most important predictors. Surprisingly, psychosocial and many technology- and driving-specific factors were not strong predictors. Results highlight the importance of individual differences for designing trustworthy AVs for diverse groups and lead to key implications for future design and research.
Read more9/16/2024
0
Anytime Trust Rating Dynamics in a Human-Robot Interaction Task
Jason Dekarske, Gregory Bales, Zhaodan Kong, Sanjay Joshi
Objective We model factors contributing to rating timing for a single-dimensional, any-time trust in robotics measure. Background Many studies view trust as a slow-changing value after subjects complete a trial or at regular intervals. Trust is a multifaceted concept that can be measured simultaneously with a human-robot interaction. Method 65 subjects commanded a remote robot arm in a simulated space station. The robot picked and placed stowage commanded by the subject, but the robot's performance varied from trial to trial. Subjects rated their trust on a non-obtrusive trust slider at any time throughout the experiment. Results A Cox Proportional Hazards Model described the time it took subjects to rate their trust in the robot. A retrospective survey indicated that subjects based their trust on the robot's performance or outcome of the task. Strong covariates representing the task's state reflected this in the model. Conclusion Trust and robot task performance contributed little to the timing of the trust rating. The subjects' exit survey responses aligned with the assumption that the robot's task progress was the main reason for the timing of their trust rating. Application Measuring trust in a human-robot interaction task should take as little attention away from the task as possible. This trust rating technique lays the groundwork for single-dimensional trust queries that probe estimated human action.
Read more8/2/2024