Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges

Read original: arXiv:2404.17227 - Published 4/30/2024 by Xintong Wu, Wanling Deng, Yuotng Quan, Luyao Zhang
Total Score

0

Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges are compared in terms of trust dynamics and market behavior.
  • The study is supported by the National Science Foundation China and the Center for Study of Contemporary China at Duke Kunshan University.
  • The research explores the mechanisms underlying trust and their impact on cryptocurrency markets.

Plain English Explanation

Cryptocurrency exchanges are platforms where people can buy, sell, and trade digital currencies like Bitcoin. There are two main types of exchanges: centralized and decentralized.

Centralized exchanges are run by a single company or organization that controls the platform and manages transactions. These exchanges often have features like user accounts, order books, and customer support.

Decentralized exchanges, on the other hand, are built on blockchain technology and operate without a central authority. Transactions are processed directly between users through smart contracts on the blockchain.

This study looks at how the differences between centralized and decentralized exchanges affect the level of trust users have in the system and how that impacts the overall behavior of the cryptocurrency market. The researchers use an interdisciplinary approach, combining game theory, reinforcement learning, and the study of human-AI interactions to understand these dynamics.

The goal is to provide insights that can help design better trust mechanisms for both centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges, ultimately leading to more stable and reliable digital asset markets.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a comparative study of centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges to examine the role of trust mechanisms and their impact on market behavior.

For centralized exchanges, the team analyzed how incidents like hacks, security breaches, or exit scams can erode user trust and affect trading activity. They also looked at how centralized exchanges try to build and maintain trust through features like customer support, insurance funds, and regulatory compliance.

In the case of decentralized exchanges, the researchers investigated how the underlying blockchain technology and distributed network architecture can influence trust dynamics. They examined how smart contracts, transparency, and the lack of a central authority shape user perceptions and market behavior.

The team used an interdisciplinary approach that combined game theory, reinforcement learning, and the study of human-AI interactions to develop a comprehensive understanding of the trust mechanisms at play in both centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough comparative analysis of trust dynamics and market behavior in centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges. However, the researchers acknowledge that their study is limited to the specific exchanges and time periods examined, and that further research is needed to validate the generalizability of their findings.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential security and privacy implications of the different exchange models, which could be an important consideration for users. The researchers also do not address the regulatory challenges and evolving legal frameworks surrounding cryptocurrency exchanges, which can significantly impact trust and market stability.

Future research could explore these additional factors and how they interact with the trust mechanisms and market dynamics analyzed in this study. Conducting cross-cultural comparisons or examining the impact of macroeconomic conditions on exchange trust and behavior could also provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

This comparative study of centralized and decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges offers important insights into the role of trust mechanisms and their influence on market behavior. The interdisciplinary approach used by the researchers provides a nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between technology, human psychology, and economic incentives in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.

The findings from this research can inform the design of more robust and trustworthy exchange platforms, potentially contributing to the long-term stability and adoption of digital assets. As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, studies like this one will be crucial in shaping the future of decentralized finance and the broader blockchain technology landscape.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges
Total Score

0

Trust Dynamics and Market Behavior in Cryptocurrency: A Comparative Study of Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges

Xintong Wu, Wanling Deng, Yuotng Quan, Luyao Zhang

In the evolving landscape of digital finance, the transition from centralized to decentralized trust mechanisms, primarily driven by blockchain technology, plays a critical role in shaping the cryptocurrency ecosystem. This paradigm shift raises questions about the traditional reliance on centralized trust and introduces a novel, decentralized trust framework built upon distributed networks. Our research delves into the consequences of this shift, particularly focusing on how incidents influence trust within cryptocurrency markets, thereby affecting trade behaviors in centralized (CEXs) and decentralized exchanges (DEXs). We conduct a comprehensive analysis of various events, assessing their effects on market dynamics, including token valuation and trading volumes in both CEXs and DEXs. Our findings highlight the pivotal role of trust in directing user preferences and the fluidity of trust transfer between centralized and decentralized platforms. Despite certain anomalies, the results largely align with our initial hypotheses, revealing the intricate nature of user trust in cryptocurrency markets. This study contributes significantly to interdisciplinary research, bridging distributed systems, behavioral finance, and Decentralized Finance (DeFi). It offers valuable insights for the distributed computing community, particularly in understanding and applying distributed trust mechanisms in digital economies, paving the way for future research that could further explore the socio-economic dimensions and leverage blockchain data in this dynamic domain.

Read more

4/30/2024

Global Trends in Cryptocurrency Regulation: An Overview
Total Score

0

Global Trends in Cryptocurrency Regulation: An Overview

Xihan Xiong, Junliang Luo

Cryptocurrencies have evolved into an important asset class, providing a variety of benefits. However, they also present significant risks, such as market volatility and the potential for misuse in illegal activities. These risks underline the urgent need for a comprehensive regulatory framework to ensure consumer protection, market integrity, and financial stability. Yet, the global landscape of cryptocurrency regulation remains complex, marked by substantial variations in regulatory frameworks among different countries. This paper aims to study these differences by investigating the regulatory landscapes across various jurisdictions. We first discuss regulatory challenges and considerations, and then conduct a comparative analysis of international regulatory stances, approaches, and measures. We hope our study offers practical insights to enhance the understanding of global trends in cryptocurrency regulation.

Read more

7/2/2024

Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust
Total Score

0

Decentralized Credential Status Management: A Paradigm Shift in Digital Trust

Patrick Herbke, Thomas Cory, Mauro Migliardi

Public key infrastructures are essential for Internet security, ensuring robust certificate management and revocation mechanisms. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems presents challenges such as trust distribution and privacy-preserving credential management. The transition from centralized to decentralized systems is motivated by addressing the single points of failure inherent in centralized systems and leveraging decentralized technologies' transparency and resilience. This paper explores the evolution of certificate status management from centralized to decentralized frameworks, focusing on blockchain technology and advanced cryptography. We provide a taxonomy of the challenges of centralized systems and discuss opportunities provided by existing decentralized technologies. Our findings reveal that, although blockchain technologies enhance security and trust distribution, they represent a bottleneck for parallel computation and face inefficiencies in cryptographic computations. For this reason, we propose a framework of decentralized technology components that addresses such shortcomings to advance the paradigm shift toward decentralized credential status management.

Read more

6/18/2024

Benchmarking the performance of a self-custody, non-ledger-based, obliviously managed digital payment system
Total Score

0

Benchmarking the performance of a self-custody, non-ledger-based, obliviously managed digital payment system

William Macpherson, Geoffrey Goodell

As global governments intensify efforts to operationalize retail central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), the imperative for architectures that preserve user privacy has never been more pronounced. This paper advances an existing retail CBDC framework developed at University College London. Utilizing the capabilities of the Comet research framework, our proposed design allows users to retain direct custody of their assets without the need for intermediary service providers, all while preserving transactional anonymity. The study unveils a novel technique to expedite the retrieval of Proof of Provenance, significantly accelerating the verification of transaction legitimacy through the refinement of Merkle Trie structures. In parallel, we introduce a streamlined Digital Ledger designed to offer fast, immutable, and decentralized transaction validation within a permissioned ecosystem. The ultimate objective of this research is to benchmark the performance of the legacy system formulated by the original Comet research team against the newly devised system elucidated in this paper. Our endeavour is to establish a foundational design for a scalable national infrastructure proficient in seamlessly processing thousands of transactions in real-time, without compromising consumer privacy or data integrity.

Read more

4/22/2024