Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube

Read original: arXiv:2402.01760 - Published 8/28/2024 by Kausik Lakkaraju, Vedant Khandelwal, Biplav Srivastava, Forest Agostinelli, Hengtao Tang, Prathamjeet Singh, Dezhi Wu, Matt Irvin, Ashish Kundu
Total Score

0

Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the ethical and trust considerations in developing a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system, using the case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube.
  • The researchers aim to address the challenge of building trustworthy and ethical AI systems that can effectively assist human learners.
  • The paper outlines the design and development of a chatbot system that combines natural language interaction, visual understanding, and step-by-step explanations to guide users through the process of solving Rubik's Cube.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the ethical and trust-related challenges in creating an AI-powered chatbot system that can help people learn how to solve Rubik's Cube puzzles. The researchers wanted to build a system that not only provides instructions and guidance, but also establishes trust and transparency with the human users.

The key idea is to develop a chatbot that can interact with users through natural language, understand visual information (like the current state of the Rubik's Cube), and provide step-by-step explanations on how to solve the puzzle. The goal is to create an AI assistant that is helpful, reliable, and trustworthy, addressing concerns around the ethical use of such advanced technologies.

The paper outlines the design and development of this chatbot system, focusing on how to make it transparent, accountable, and aligned with human values. This includes features like providing clear explanations for the chatbot's actions, allowing users to query and challenge the system's reasoning, and ensuring the system's behavior adheres to ethical principles.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents the design and development of a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot system to assist users in collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube puzzles. The system combines natural language interaction, visual understanding, and step-by-step explanations to guide users through the problem-solving process.

The key technical components include:

  1. Natural Language Processing: The chatbot uses advanced NLP techniques to understand and respond to user queries in natural language.
  2. Computer Vision: The system can perceive and analyze the current state of the Rubik's Cube using computer vision algorithms.
  3. Explainable AI: The chatbot provides step-by-step explanations for its recommendations and actions, allowing users to understand and trust the system's decision-making process.

The researchers emphasize the importance of designing the system with ethical considerations in mind, such as transparency, accountability, and alignment with human values. This includes features like allowing users to query and challenge the system's reasoning, and ensuring the system's behavior adheres to ethical principles.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important ethical and trust-related considerations in the development of advanced AI-driven tutoring systems. The researchers acknowledge the potential risks and challenges in building such systems, including concerns around transparency, accountability, and the alignment of AI systems with human values.

One limitation of the research is that it is primarily focused on the theoretical design and development of the chatbot system, without extensive user testing or evaluation. It would be valuable to see empirical data on the system's performance, user perceptions, and the effectiveness of the proposed ethical and trust-building mechanisms.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases or fairness issues that could arise in such a system, given the reliance on machine learning and the potential for data biases to be reflected in the system's outputs. Further research could explore strategies for mitigating these concerns.

Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the importance of considering ethical and trust-related factors in the design of AI-driven educational technologies. The proposed chatbot system provides a promising approach, but more research is needed to fully validate its effectiveness and address the complex challenges in this domain.

Conclusion

This paper presents an important exploration of the ethical and trust considerations in developing a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system, using the case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube. The researchers have outlined a thoughtful approach to designing such a system, with a focus on transparency, accountability, and alignment with human values.

The proposed chatbot system demonstrates the potential of AI-powered educational technologies to provide personalized, interactive, and explainable assistance to learners. However, the critical analysis highlights the need for further research and validation, particularly around issues of bias, fairness, and the real-world impact on user trust and learning outcomes.

As AI systems become more advanced and integrated into educational and training environments, it is crucial that developers prioritize ethical considerations and work to build trustworthy, transparent, and responsible AI-driven technologies. The insights and design principles presented in this paper offer a valuable contribution to this important area of research and development.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube
Total Score

0

Trust and ethical considerations in a multi-modal, explainable AI-driven chatbot tutoring system: The case of collaboratively solving Rubik's Cube

Kausik Lakkaraju, Vedant Khandelwal, Biplav Srivastava, Forest Agostinelli, Hengtao Tang, Prathamjeet Singh, Dezhi Wu, Matt Irvin, Ashish Kundu

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform education with its power of uncovering insights from massive data about student learning patterns. However, ethical and trustworthy concerns of AI have been raised but are unsolved. Prominent ethical issues in high school AI education include data privacy, information leakage, abusive language, and fairness. This paper describes technological components that were built to address ethical and trustworthy concerns in a multi-modal collaborative platform (called ALLURE chatbot) for high school students to collaborate with AI to solve the Rubik's cube. In data privacy, we want to ensure that the informed consent of children, parents, and teachers, is at the center of any data that is managed. Since children are involved, language, whether textual, audio, or visual, is acceptable both from users and AI and the system can steer interaction away from dangerous situations. In information management, we also want to ensure that the system, while learning to improve over time, does not leak information about users from one group to another.

Read more

8/28/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Towards ethical multimodal systems

Alexis Roger, Esma Aimeur, Irina Rish

Generative AI systems (ChatGPT, DALL-E, etc) are expanding into multiple areas of our lives, from art Rombach et al. [2021] to mental health Rob Morris and Kareem Kouddous [2022]; their rapidly growing societal impact opens new opportunities, but also raises ethical concerns. The emerging field of AI alignment aims to make AI systems reflect human values. This paper focuses on evaluating the ethics of multimodal AI systems involving both text and images - a relatively under-explored area, as most alignment work is currently focused on language models. We first create a multimodal ethical database from human feedback on ethicality. Then, using this database, we develop algorithms, including a RoBERTa-large classifier and a multilayer perceptron, to automatically assess the ethicality of system responses.

Read more

5/21/2024

Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Models
Total Score

0

Towards Trustworthy AI: A Review of Ethical and Robust Large Language Models

Md Meftahul Ferdaus, Mahdi Abdelguerfi, Elias Ioup, Kendall N. Niles, Ken Pathak, Steven Sloan

The rapid progress in Large Language Models (LLMs) could transform many fields, but their fast development creates significant challenges for oversight, ethical creation, and building user trust. This comprehensive review looks at key trust issues in LLMs, such as unintended harms, lack of transparency, vulnerability to attacks, alignment with human values, and environmental impact. Many obstacles can undermine user trust, including societal biases, opaque decision-making, potential for misuse, and the challenges of rapidly evolving technology. Addressing these trust gaps is critical as LLMs become more common in sensitive areas like finance, healthcare, education, and policy. To tackle these issues, we suggest combining ethical oversight, industry accountability, regulation, and public involvement. AI development norms should be reshaped, incentives aligned, and ethics integrated throughout the machine learning process, which requires close collaboration across technology, ethics, law, policy, and other fields. Our review contributes a robust framework to assess trust in LLMs and analyzes the complex trust dynamics in depth. We provide contextualized guidelines and standards for responsibly developing and deploying these powerful AI systems. This review identifies key limitations and challenges in creating trustworthy AI. By addressing these issues, we aim to build a transparent, accountable AI ecosystem that benefits society while minimizing risks. Our findings provide valuable guidance for researchers, policymakers, and industry leaders striving to establish trust in LLMs and ensure they are used responsibly across various applications for the good of society.

Read more

7/22/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

The Responsible Development of Automated Student Feedback with Generative AI

Euan D Lindsay, Mike Zhang, Aditya Johri, Johannes Bjerva

Contribution: This paper identifies four critical ethical considerations for implementing generative AI tools to provide automated feedback to students. Background: Providing rich feedback to students is essential for supporting student learning. Recent advances in generative AI, particularly with large language models (LLMs), provide the opportunity to deliver repeatable, scalable and instant automatically generated feedback to students, making abundant a previously scarce and expensive learning resource. Such an approach is feasible from a technical perspective due to these recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP); while the potential upside is a strong motivator, doing so introduces a range of potential ethical issues that must be considered as we apply these technologies. Intended Outcomes: The goal of this work is to enable the use of AI systems to automate mundane assessment and feedback tasks, without introducing a tyranny of the majority, where the needs of minorities in the long tail are overlooked because they are difficult to automate. Application Design: This paper applies an extant ethical framework used for AI and machine learning to the specific challenge of providing automated feedback to student engineers. The task is considered from both a development and maintenance perspective, considering how automated feedback tools will evolve and be used over time. Findings: This paper identifies four key ethical considerations for the implementation of automated feedback for students: Participation, Development, Impact on Learning and Evolution over Time.

Read more

7/31/2024