Two parallel dynamic lexicographic algorithms for factorization sets in numerical semigroups

Read original: arXiv:2407.20474 - Published 7/31/2024 by Thomas Barron
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents two parallel algorithms for computing the factorization sets of numerical semigroups.
  • Numerical semigroups are mathematical structures that have applications in various fields, including algebraic coding theory and cryptography.
  • Factorization sets are important invariants of numerical semigroups that describe the different ways an element can be expressed as a sum of generators.
  • The proposed algorithms leverage dynamic programming and memoization techniques to achieve efficient computation of factorization sets.
  • The algorithms are designed to run in parallel, taking advantage of modern multi-core hardware to speed up the computations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses two new algorithms for factorization sets in numerical semigroups. Numerical semigroups are a type of mathematical structure that have applications in areas like coding theory and cryptography.

The factorization set of a numerical semigroup describes the different ways that numbers in the semigroup can be expressed as a sum of its generator elements. Computing these factorization sets is an important problem, and the algorithms in this paper aim to do it more efficiently.

The key ideas are to use dynamic programming and memoization techniques to avoid redundant computations. The algorithms are also designed to run in parallel, taking advantage of modern multi-core computer hardware to speed up the overall computation time.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents two parallel algorithms for computing the factorization sets of numerical semigroups. Numerical semigroups are additive submonoids of the natural numbers that contain 0, and their factorization sets describe the different ways an element can be expressed as a sum of the semigroup's generators.

The first algorithm, called the Parallel Dynamic Lexicographic (PDL) algorithm, uses a dynamic programming approach to efficiently compute the factorization sets. It employs memoization to avoid redundant computations and leverages parallel processing to speed up the overall computation.

The second algorithm, called the Parallel Dynamic Lexicographic with Backtracking (PDLB) algorithm, builds upon the PDL algorithm by incorporating a backtracking step. This allows it to generate the factorization sets in lexicographic order, which can be useful in certain applications.

Both algorithms are analyzed theoretically and empirically. The authors provide complexity analyses to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed methods, and they also present experimental results showing significant performance improvements over existing approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough study of parallel algorithms for computing factorization sets in numerical semigroups. The use of dynamic programming and memoization techniques is a sound approach to improve the efficiency of these computations.

One potential limitation of the research is that the experiments are conducted on a relatively small number of numerical semigroups. While the results are promising, it would be valuable to see how the algorithms scale and perform on larger, more diverse sets of semigroups. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between the PDL and PDLB algorithms in terms of computation time, memory usage, or other relevant metrics.

Furthermore, the paper does not discuss the potential implications or applications of the proposed algorithms beyond the theoretical and computational aspects. It would be interesting to see how these algorithms could be leveraged in real-world scenarios, such as in the context of algebraic coding theory or cryptography.

Overall, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of numerical semigroup theory and the efficient computation of factorization sets. The parallel algorithms developed in this work demonstrate the potential for leveraging modern hardware to tackle complex mathematical problems more effectively.

Conclusion

This paper introduces two parallel algorithms for computing the factorization sets of numerical semigroups, which are important mathematical structures with applications in various fields. The proposed algorithms, PDL and PDLB, utilize dynamic programming and memoization techniques to achieve efficient computations, and they are designed to take advantage of parallel processing on modern multi-core systems.

The theoretical and empirical analyses provided in the paper demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, showing significant performance improvements over existing approaches. While the experiments are limited to a relatively small set of semigroups, the core ideas presented in this work have the potential to be further developed and applied in a wider range of numerical semigroup-related applications, such as algebraic coding theory and cryptography.

The parallel algorithms introduced in this paper represent an important advancement in the efficient computation of factorization sets, and they could have far-reaching implications for researchers and practitioners working in the field of numerical semigroup theory and its various applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

Two parallel dynamic lexicographic algorithms for factorization sets in numerical semigroups

Thomas Barron

To the existing dynamic algorithm FactorizationsUpToElement for factorization sets of elements in a numerical semigroup, we add lexicographic and parallel behavior. To the existing parallel lexicographic algorithm for the same, we add dynamic behavior. The (dimensionwise) dynamic algorithm is parallelized either elementwise or factorizationwise, while the parallel lexicographic algorithm is made dynamic with low-dimension tabulation. The tabulation for the parallel lexicographic algorithm can itself be performed using the dynamic algorithm. We provide reference CUDA implementations with measured runtimes.

Read more

7/31/2024

Parallel and (Nearly) Work-Efficient Dynamic Programming
Total Score

0

Parallel and (Nearly) Work-Efficient Dynamic Programming

Xiangyun Ding, Yan Gu, Yihan Sun

The idea of dynamic programming (DP), proposed by Bellman in the 1950s, is one of the most important algorithmic techniques. However, in parallel, many fundamental and sequentially simple problems become more challenging, and open to a (nearly) work-efficient solution (i.e., the work is off by at most a polylogarithmic factor over the best sequential solution). In fact, sequential DP algorithms employ many advanced optimizations such as decision monotonicity or special data structures, and achieve better work than straightforward solutions. Many such optimizations are inherently sequential, which creates extra challenges for a parallel algorithm to achieve the same work bound. The goal of this paper is to achieve (nearly) work-efficient parallel DP algorithms by parallelizing classic, highly-optimized and practical sequential algorithms. We show a general framework called the Cordon Algorithm for parallel DP algorithms, and use it to solve several classic problems. Our selection of problems includes Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS), sparse Longest Common Subsequence (LCS), convex/concave generalized Least Weight Subsequence (LWS), Optimal Alphabetic Tree (OAT), and more. We show how the Cordon Algorithm can be used to achieve the same level of optimization as the sequential algorithms, and achieve good parallelism. Many of our algorithms are conceptually simple, and we show some experimental results as proofs-of-concept.

Read more

5/24/2024

A Reexamination of the COnfLUX 2.5D LU Factorization Algorithm
Total Score

0

A Reexamination of the COnfLUX 2.5D LU Factorization Algorithm

Yuan Tang

This article conducts a reexamination of the research conducted by Kwasniewski et al., focusing on their adaptation of the 2.5D LU factorization algorithm with tournament pivoting, known as func{COnfLUX}. Our reexamination reveals potential concerns regarding the upper bound, empirical investigation methods, and lower bound, despite the original study providing a theoretical foundation and an instantiation of the proposed algorithm. This paper offers a reexamination of these matters, highlighting probable shortcomings in the original investigation. Our observations are intended to enhance the development and comprehension of parallel matrix factorization algorithms.

Read more

4/11/2024

In-depth Analysis of Low-rank Matrix Factorisation in a Federated Setting
Total Score

0

In-depth Analysis of Low-rank Matrix Factorisation in a Federated Setting

Constantin Philippenko, Kevin Scaman, Laurent Massouli'e

We analyze a distributed algorithm to compute a low-rank matrix factorization on $N$ clients, each holding a local dataset $mathbf{S}^i in mathbb{R}^{n_i times d}$, mathematically, we seek to solve $min_{mathbf{U}^i in mathbb{R}^{n_itimes r}, mathbf{V}in mathbb{R}^{d times r} } frac{1}{2} sum_{i=1}^N |mathbf{S}^i - mathbf{U}^i mathbf{V}^top|^2_{text{F}}$. Considering a power initialization of $mathbf{V}$, we rewrite the previous smooth non-convex problem into a smooth strongly-convex problem that we solve using a parallel Nesterov gradient descent potentially requiring a single step of communication at the initialization step. For any client $i$ in ${1, dots, N}$, we obtain a global $mathbf{V}$ in $mathbb{R}^{d times r}$ common to all clients and a local variable $mathbf{U}^i$ in $mathbb{R}^{n_i times r}$. We provide a linear rate of convergence of the excess loss which depends on $sigma_{max} / sigma_{r}$, where $sigma_{r}$ is the $r^{mathrm{th}}$ singular value of the concatenation $mathbf{S}$ of the matrices $(mathbf{S}^i)_{i=1}^N$. This result improves the rates of convergence given in the literature, which depend on $sigma_{max}^2 / sigma_{min}^2$. We provide an upper bound on the Frobenius-norm error of reconstruction under the power initialization strategy. We complete our analysis with experiments on both synthetic and real data.

Read more

9/16/2024