Two-Phase Dynamics of Interactions Explains the Starting Point of a DNN Learning Over-Fitted Features

Read original: arXiv:2405.10262 - Published 5/17/2024 by Junpeng Zhang, Qing Li, Liang Lin, Quanshi Zhang
Total Score

0

Two-Phase Dynamics of Interactions Explains the Starting Point of a DNN Learning Over-Fitted Features

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper investigates the two-phase dynamics of interactions that lead to the starting point of a deep neural network (DNN) learning over-fitted features.
  • It provides insights into the initial stages of DNN training and how the network can latch onto over-fitted features, which can be detrimental to generalization.
  • The research aims to understand the fundamental mechanisms underlying the early stages of DNN learning and the emergence of over-fitting.

Plain English Explanation

When training a deep neural network, the network can sometimes start by learning features that are specific to the training data, rather than generalizable features that would work well on new, unseen data. This phenomenon is known as over-fitting, and it can be a significant challenge in machine learning.

The paper proposes that the initial stages of DNN training can be understood through a two-phase dynamic of interactions. In the first phase, the network focuses on learning simple, low-level features that are easily recognizable in the training data. In the second phase, the network starts to latch onto more complex, over-fitted features that are specific to the training data but may not generalize well.

The researchers use mathematical models and simulations to explore this two-phase dynamic and understand how it can lead to the starting point of a DNN learning over-fitted features. This provides insights into the fundamental mechanisms underlying the early stages of DNN training and the emergence of over-fitting, which can inform the development of better training techniques and architectural designs to improve the generalization capabilities of DNNs.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the two-phase dynamics of interactions that govern the initial stages of DNN learning, leading to the starting point of the network learning over-fitted features.

The researchers use a mean-field approach to model the training dynamics of a simple two-layer neural network. They analyze the behavior of the network during the early stages of training, focusing on the emergence of over-fitting and the factors that contribute to it.

The study reveals that the two-phase dynamics of interactions can be characterized as follows:

  1. In the first phase, the network focuses on learning simple, low-level features that are easily recognizable in the training data. This phase is driven by the network's ability to quickly learn straightforward patterns.

  2. In the second phase, the network starts to latch onto more complex, over-fitted features that are specific to the training data but may not generalize well. This phase is driven by the network's tendency to exploit subtle patterns in the training data, which can lead to over-fitting.

The researchers also investigate the impact of various factors, such as network architecture, data distribution, and training dynamics, on the two-phase dynamics and the starting point of the network learning over-fitted features.

The findings from this work contribute to a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms underlying the early stages of DNN training and the emergence of over-fitting. This knowledge can inform the development of improved training techniques and architectural designs to enhance the generalization capabilities of deep neural networks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the initial stages of DNN training and the emergence of over-fitting, but it also has some limitations and potential areas for further research.

One limitation is that the analysis is based on a simplified two-layer neural network model, which may not capture the full complexity of modern deep learning architectures. It would be interesting to see how the two-phase dynamics play out in more realistic and deeper network architectures.

Additionally, the study focuses on the initial stages of training, but it does not address the dynamics and potential for recovery from over-fitting during later stages of training. Exploring the full training trajectory and how to mitigate over-fitting could be a fruitful area for further research.

Another aspect that could be explored is the influence of various regularization techniques and their impact on the two-phase dynamics. Understanding how different regularization methods affect the emergence and persistence of over-fitted features could lead to more effective strategies for improving generalization.

Overall, the paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for understanding the early stages of DNN learning and the onset of over-fitting. While the study is limited in scope, it lays the groundwork for further investigations into the fundamental mechanisms underlying deep learning and the development of more robust and generalized neural network models.

Conclusion

The paper explores the two-phase dynamics of interactions that govern the initial stages of deep neural network (DNN) learning and lead to the starting point of the network learning over-fitted features. By using a mean-field approach to model a simple two-layer neural network, the researchers uncover the distinct phases of DNN training:

  1. The first phase, where the network focuses on learning simple, low-level features that are easily recognizable in the training data.
  2. The second phase, where the network starts to latch onto more complex, over-fitted features that are specific to the training data but may not generalize well.

This two-phase dynamic provides insights into the fundamental mechanisms underlying the early stages of DNN training and the emergence of over-fitting. The findings can inform the development of improved training techniques and architectural designs to enhance the generalization capabilities of deep neural networks, which is a crucial challenge in the field of machine learning.

While the analysis is limited to a simplified model, the paper lays the foundation for further investigations into the full training trajectory and the mitigation of over-fitting through the use of various regularization methods. By understanding the dynamics that lead to the starting point of DNN learning over-fitted features, researchers can work towards creating more robust and generalizable deep learning models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Two-Phase Dynamics of Interactions Explains the Starting Point of a DNN Learning Over-Fitted Features
Total Score

0

Two-Phase Dynamics of Interactions Explains the Starting Point of a DNN Learning Over-Fitted Features

Junpeng Zhang, Qing Li, Liang Lin, Quanshi Zhang

This paper investigates the dynamics of a deep neural network (DNN) learning interactions. Previous studies have discovered and mathematically proven that given each input sample, a well-trained DNN usually only encodes a small number of interactions (non-linear relationships) between input variables in the sample. A series of theorems have been derived to prove that we can consider the DNN's inference equivalent to using these interactions as primitive patterns for inference. In this paper, we discover the DNN learns interactions in two phases. The first phase mainly penalizes interactions of medium and high orders, and the second phase mainly learns interactions of gradually increasing orders. We can consider the two-phase phenomenon as the starting point of a DNN learning over-fitted features. Such a phenomenon has been widely shared by DNNs with various architectures trained for different tasks. Therefore, the discovery of the two-phase dynamics provides a detailed mechanism for how a DNN gradually learns different inference patterns (interactions). In particular, we have also verified the claim that high-order interactions have weaker generalization power than low-order interactions. Thus, the discovered two-phase dynamics also explains how the generalization power of a DNN changes during the training process.

Read more

5/17/2024

Towards the Dynamics of a DNN Learning Symbolic Interactions
Total Score

0

Towards the Dynamics of a DNN Learning Symbolic Interactions

Qihan Ren, Yang Xu, Junpeng Zhang, Yue Xin, Dongrui Liu, Quanshi Zhang

This study proves the two-phase dynamics of a deep neural network (DNN) learning interactions. Despite the long disappointing view of the faithfulness of post-hoc explanation of a DNN, in recent years, a series of theorems have been proven to show that given an input sample, a small number of interactions between input variables can be considered as primitive inference patterns, which can faithfully represent every detailed inference logic of the DNN on this sample. Particularly, it has been observed that various DNNs all learn interactions of different complexities with two-phase dynamics, and this well explains how a DNN's generalization power changes from under-fitting to over-fitting. Therefore, in this study, we prove the dynamics of a DNN gradually encoding interactions of different complexities, which provides a theoretically grounded mechanism for the over-fitting of a DNN. Experiments show that our theory well predicts the real learning dynamics of various DNNs on different tasks.

Read more

7/30/2024

Grokking as a First Order Phase Transition in Two Layer Networks
Total Score

0

Grokking as a First Order Phase Transition in Two Layer Networks

Noa Rubin, Inbar Seroussi, Zohar Ringel

A key property of deep neural networks (DNNs) is their ability to learn new features during training. This intriguing aspect of deep learning stands out most clearly in recently reported Grokking phenomena. While mainly reflected as a sudden increase in test accuracy, Grokking is also believed to be a beyond lazy-learning/Gaussian Process (GP) phenomenon involving feature learning. Here we apply a recent development in the theory of feature learning, the adaptive kernel approach, to two teacher-student models with cubic-polynomial and modular addition teachers. We provide analytical predictions on feature learning and Grokking properties of these models and demonstrate a mapping between Grokking and the theory of phase transitions. We show that after Grokking, the state of the DNN is analogous to the mixed phase following a first-order phase transition. In this mixed phase, the DNN generates useful internal representations of the teacher that are sharply distinct from those before the transition.

Read more

5/7/2024

A spring-block theory of feature learning in deep neural networks
Total Score

0

A spring-block theory of feature learning in deep neural networks

Cheng Shi, Liming Pan, Ivan Dokmani'c

A central question in deep learning is how deep neural networks (DNNs) learn features. DNN layers progressively collapse data into a regular low-dimensional geometry. This collective effect of non-linearity, noise, learning rate, width, depth, and numerous other parameters, has eluded first-principles theories which are built from microscopic neuronal dynamics. Here we present a noise-non-linearity phase diagram that highlights where shallow or deep layers learn features more effectively. We then propose a macroscopic mechanical theory of feature learning that accurately reproduces this phase diagram, offering a clear intuition for why and how some DNNs are ``lazy'' and some are ``active'', and relating the distribution of feature learning over layers with test accuracy.

Read more

7/30/2024