Uncertainty Quantification on Graph Learning: A Survey
2404.14642
0
0
🎯
Abstract
Graphical models, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), have demonstrated their exceptional capabilities across numerous fields. These models necessitate effective uncertainty quantification to ensure reliable decision-making amid the challenges posed by model training discrepancies and unpredictable testing scenarios. This survey examines recent works that address uncertainty quantification within the model architectures, training, and inference of GNNs and PGMs. We aim to provide an overview of the current landscape of uncertainty in graphical models by organizing the recent methods into uncertainty representation and handling. By summarizing state-of-the-art methods, this survey seeks to deepen the understanding of uncertainty quantification in graphical models, thereby increasing their effectiveness and safety in critical applications.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Graphical models, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), have demonstrated exceptional capabilities across numerous fields.
- These models require effective uncertainty quantification to ensure reliable decision-making, as they face challenges posed by model training discrepancies and unpredictable testing scenarios.
- This survey examines recent works that address uncertainty quantification within the model architectures, training, and inference of GNNs and PGMs.
Plain English Explanation
Graphical models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), have shown to be incredibly powerful in a wide range of applications. However, these models need to be able to properly quantify the uncertainty in their predictions to ensure they can be relied upon, especially when facing challenges like inconsistencies in the training data or unpredictable real-world scenarios.
This paper examines recent research that focuses on addressing the issue of uncertainty quantification within the structure, training, and use of graphical models. The goal is to provide an overview of the current state of the art in this area, helping to improve the effectiveness and safety of these models in critical applications.
Technical Explanation
This survey explores recent advancements in the area of uncertainty quantification for graphical models, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs). These models have demonstrated impressive capabilities across numerous domains, but they require robust uncertainty quantification to ensure reliable decision-making in the face of challenges like discrepancies in model training and unpredictable testing environments.
The paper organizes the recent methods into two main categories: uncertainty representation and uncertainty handling. By summarizing the state-of-the-art approaches in these areas, the survey aims to deepen the understanding of uncertainty quantification in graphical models, ultimately enhancing their effectiveness and safety in critical applications.
Critical Analysis
The survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of uncertainty quantification in graphical models, including both GNNs and PGMs. However, the paper does not delve into the specific limitations or potential issues with the discussed approaches. For example, it does not address the computational complexity or scalability challenges that may arise when applying these uncertainty quantification techniques to large-scale, real-world problems.
Additionally, the survey could have benefited from a more critical analysis of the trade-offs and design choices involved in the various uncertainty quantification methods. This could have helped readers better understand the nuances and contexts in which certain approaches may be more suitable than others.
Further research may be needed to address the generalizability of these uncertainty quantification techniques across different domains and model architectures, as well as to investigate the long-term implications and potential ethical concerns associated with the deployment of these models in high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in uncertainty quantification for graphical models, including GNNs and PGMs. By organizing the current methods into uncertainty representation and handling, the paper deepens the understanding of this important field, which is crucial for ensuring the reliability and safety of these powerful models in critical applications.
The insights gained from this survey can inform the development of more robust and trustworthy graphical models, ultimately contributing to their widespread and responsible adoption across various domains, from predictive modeling to large language model uncertainty quantification.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
A Comprehensive Survey on Uncertainty Quantification for Deep Learning
Wenchong He, Zhe Jiang
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved tremendous success in making accurate predictions for computer vision, natural language processing, as well as science and engineering domains. However, it is also well-recognized that DNNs sometimes make unexpected, incorrect, but overconfident predictions. This can cause serious consequences in high-stake applications, such as autonomous driving, medical diagnosis, and disaster response. Uncertainty quantification (UQ) aims to estimate the confidence of DNN predictions beyond prediction accuracy. In recent years, many UQ methods have been developed for DNNs. It is of great practical value to systematically categorize these UQ methods and compare their advantages and disadvantages. However, existing surveys mostly focus on categorizing UQ methodologies from a neural network architecture perspective or a Bayesian perspective and ignore the source of uncertainty that each methodology can incorporate, making it difficult to select an appropriate UQ method in practice. To fill the gap, this paper presents a systematic taxonomy of UQ methods for DNNs based on the types of uncertainty sources (data uncertainty versus model uncertainty). We summarize the advantages and disadvantages of methods in each category. We show how our taxonomy of UQ methodologies can potentially help guide the choice of UQ method in different machine learning problems (e.g., active learning, robustness, and reinforcement learning). We also identify current research gaps and propose several future research directions.
4/11/2024
🧠
Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification For Pre-trained Neural Network
Hanjing Wang, Qiang Ji
0
0
Epistemic uncertainty quantification (UQ) identifies where models lack knowledge. Traditional UQ methods, often based on Bayesian neural networks, are not suitable for pre-trained non-Bayesian models. Our study addresses quantifying epistemic uncertainty for any pre-trained model, which does not need the original training data or model modifications and can ensure broad applicability regardless of network architectures or training techniques. Specifically, we propose a gradient-based approach to assess epistemic uncertainty, analyzing the gradients of outputs relative to model parameters, and thereby indicating necessary model adjustments to accurately represent the inputs. We first explore theoretical guarantees of gradient-based methods for epistemic UQ, questioning the view that this uncertainty is only calculable through differences between multiple models. We further improve gradient-driven UQ by using class-specific weights for integrating gradients and emphasizing distinct contributions from neural network layers. Additionally, we enhance UQ accuracy by combining gradient and perturbation methods to refine the gradients. We evaluate our approach on out-of-distribution detection, uncertainty calibration, and active learning, demonstrating its superiority over current state-of-the-art UQ methods for pre-trained models.
4/17/2024
🧠
Linear Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification on Graphs
Clemens Damke, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
We address the problem of uncertainty quantification for graph-structured data, or, more specifically, the problem to quantify the predictive uncertainty in (semi-supervised) node classification. Key questions in this regard concern the distinction between two different types of uncertainty, aleatoric and epistemic, and how to support uncertainty quantification by leveraging the structural information provided by the graph topology. Challenging assumptions and postulates of state-of-the-art methods, we propose a novel approach that represents (epistemic) uncertainty in terms of mixtures of Dirichlet distributions and refers to the established principle of linear opinion pooling for propagating information between neighbored nodes in the graph. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated in a series of experiments on a variety of graph-structured datasets.
6/7/2024
Graph Mining under Data scarcity
Appan Rakaraddi, Lam Siew-Kei, Mahardhika Pratama, Marcus de Carvalho
0
0
Multitude of deep learning models have been proposed for node classification in graphs. However, they tend to perform poorly under labeled-data scarcity. Although Few-shot learning for graphs has been introduced to overcome this problem, the existing models are not easily adaptable for generic graph learning frameworks like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Our work proposes an Uncertainty Estimator framework that can be applied on top of any generic GNN backbone network (which are typically designed for supervised/semi-supervised node classification) to improve the node classification performance. A neural network is used to model the Uncertainty Estimator as a probability distribution rather than probabilistic discrete scalar values. We train these models under the classic episodic learning paradigm in the $n$-way, $k$-shot fashion, in an end-to-end setting. Our work demonstrates that implementation of the uncertainty estimator on a GNN backbone network improves the classification accuracy under Few-shot setting without any meta-learning specific architecture. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets under different Few-shot settings and different GNN-based backbone networks. Our method outperforms the baselines, which demonstrates the efficacy of the Uncertainty Estimator for Few-shot node classification on graphs with a GNN.
6/12/2024