Linear Opinion Pooling for Uncertainty Quantification on Graphs
2406.04041
0
0
🧠
Abstract
We address the problem of uncertainty quantification for graph-structured data, or, more specifically, the problem to quantify the predictive uncertainty in (semi-supervised) node classification. Key questions in this regard concern the distinction between two different types of uncertainty, aleatoric and epistemic, and how to support uncertainty quantification by leveraging the structural information provided by the graph topology. Challenging assumptions and postulates of state-of-the-art methods, we propose a novel approach that represents (epistemic) uncertainty in terms of mixtures of Dirichlet distributions and refers to the established principle of linear opinion pooling for propagating information between neighbored nodes in the graph. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated in a series of experiments on a variety of graph-structured datasets.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper addresses the challenge of quantifying uncertainty in graph-structured data, particularly for semi-supervised node classification tasks.
- It distinguishes between two types of uncertainty: aleatoric (inherent randomness) and epistemic (model uncertainty).
- The proposed approach represents epistemic uncertainty using mixtures of Dirichlet distributions and leverages the graph topology to propagate information between neighboring nodes.
- The effectiveness of this method is demonstrated through experiments on various graph-structured datasets.
Plain English Explanation
When working with graph-structured data, such as social networks or knowledge graphs, there is often uncertainty about the correct classification of nodes (e.g., predicting the topic of a social media post or the type of entity in a knowledge graph). This paper explores ways to quantify this uncertainty and better understand the reliability of the predictions.
The authors identify two main types of uncertainty: aleatoric and epistemic. Aleatoric uncertainty refers to the inherent randomness or unpredictability in the data, while epistemic uncertainty is related to the limitations of the model and the available information. For example, if a social media post contains ambiguous language, there may be aleatoric uncertainty about its true topic. On the other hand, epistemic uncertainty might arise if the model has not been trained on sufficient data to make a confident prediction.
The key innovation in this paper is a new approach that represents epistemic uncertainty using a mixture of Dirichlet distributions. This allows the model to express its uncertainty more nuanced than previous methods. Additionally, the authors leverage the structure of the graph to propagate information between neighboring nodes, which can help reduce uncertainty in cases where related nodes provide additional context.
Through a series of experiments on various graph-structured datasets, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach in quantifying uncertainty and improving the reliability of node classification predictions. This has important applications in areas like active learning on graphs, where the model can identify the most informative data points to label, and pre-trained neural networks, where the model's uncertainty can be used to assess the reliability of its outputs.
Overall, this research advances our understanding of how to effectively quantify and manage uncertainty in graph-structured data, which is crucial for developing robust and trustworthy AI systems that can make reliable predictions, especially in complex, interconnected domains.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a novel approach for quantifying predictive uncertainty in semi-supervised node classification tasks on graph-structured data. The key elements of the method are:
-
Uncertainty Representation: The authors represent epistemic uncertainty using mixtures of Dirichlet distributions, which can capture more nuanced uncertainty compared to previous approaches.
-
Information Propagation: The method leverages the graph topology to propagate information between neighboring nodes, allowing the model to leverage contextual cues from the graph structure to reduce uncertainty.
-
Linear Opinion Pooling: The authors refer to the principle of linear opinion pooling to combine the uncertainty estimates of neighboring nodes, providing a principled way to aggregate and propagate uncertainty information across the graph.
The effectiveness of the proposed approach is evaluated through experiments on a variety of graph-structured datasets, including citation networks, social networks, and knowledge graphs. The authors compare their method to state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification techniques and demonstrate improvements in terms of uncertainty calibration and downstream task performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of uncertainty quantification for graph-structured data. The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future research, including the need to further explore the theoretical properties of the proposed uncertainty representation and the potential for incorporating additional graph-based inductive biases.
One potential concern is the computational complexity of the proposed method, as the mixture of Dirichlet distributions may increase the model's inference time compared to simpler uncertainty quantification approaches. The authors note that this is an area for further optimization and investigation.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on semi-supervised node classification tasks, and it would be valuable to explore the applicability of the proposed techniques to other graph-based learning problems, such as link prediction or graph generation, where uncertainty quantification may also be crucial.
Overall, this research represents a significant contribution to the field of uncertainty quantification for graph-structured data, and the proposed approach offers a promising direction for improving the reliability and interpretability of graph-based AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for quantifying predictive uncertainty in semi-supervised node classification tasks on graph-structured data. By representing epistemic uncertainty using mixtures of Dirichlet distributions and leveraging the graph topology to propagate information between neighboring nodes, the authors demonstrate improvements in uncertainty calibration and downstream task performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
The research advances our understanding of how to effectively manage and quantify uncertainty in complex, interconnected domains, which is crucial for developing trustworthy and robust AI systems. The findings have important implications for a wide range of applications, including active learning, pre-trained neural networks, and decision-making in domains where reliable predictions are essential.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🎯
Uncertainty Quantification on Graph Learning: A Survey
Chao Chen, Chenghua Guo, Rui Xu, Xiangwen Liao, Xi Zhang, Sihong Xie, Hui Xiong, Philip Yu
0
0
Graphical models, including Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), have demonstrated their exceptional capabilities across numerous fields. These models necessitate effective uncertainty quantification to ensure reliable decision-making amid the challenges posed by model training discrepancies and unpredictable testing scenarios. This survey examines recent works that address uncertainty quantification within the model architectures, training, and inference of GNNs and PGMs. We aim to provide an overview of the current landscape of uncertainty in graphical models by organizing the recent methods into uncertainty representation and handling. By summarizing state-of-the-art methods, this survey seeks to deepen the understanding of uncertainty quantification in graphical models, thereby increasing their effectiveness and safety in critical applications.
4/24/2024
Label-wise Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification
Yusuf Sale, Paul Hofman, Timo Lohr, Lisa Wimmer, Thomas Nagler, Eyke Hullermeier
0
0
We present a novel approach to uncertainty quantification in classification tasks based on label-wise decomposition of uncertainty measures. This label-wise perspective allows uncertainty to be quantified at the individual class level, thereby improving cost-sensitive decision-making and helping understand the sources of uncertainty. Furthermore, it allows to define total, aleatoric, and epistemic uncertainty on the basis of non-categorical measures such as variance, going beyond common entropy-based measures. In particular, variance-based measures address some of the limitations associated with established methods that have recently been discussed in the literature. We show that our proposed measures adhere to a number of desirable properties. Through empirical evaluation on a variety of benchmark data sets -- including applications in the medical domain where accurate uncertainty quantification is crucial -- we establish the effectiveness of label-wise uncertainty quantification.
6/5/2024
💬
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs
Dominik Fuchsgruber, Tom Wollschlager, Bertrand Charpentier, Antonio Oroz, Stephan Gunnemann
0
0
Uncertainty Sampling is an Active Learning strategy that aims to improve the data efficiency of machine learning models by iteratively acquiring labels of data points with the highest uncertainty. While it has proven effective for independent data its applicability to graphs remains under-explored. We propose the first extensive study of Uncertainty Sampling for node classification: (1) We benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies. (2) We develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries. We confirm our results on synthetic data and design an approximate approach that consistently outperforms other uncertainty estimators on real datasets. (3) Based on this analysis, we relate pitfalls in modeling uncertainty to existing methods. Our analysis enables and informs the development of principled uncertainty estimation on graphs.
5/3/2024
Graph Mining under Data scarcity
Appan Rakaraddi, Lam Siew-Kei, Mahardhika Pratama, Marcus de Carvalho
0
0
Multitude of deep learning models have been proposed for node classification in graphs. However, they tend to perform poorly under labeled-data scarcity. Although Few-shot learning for graphs has been introduced to overcome this problem, the existing models are not easily adaptable for generic graph learning frameworks like Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Our work proposes an Uncertainty Estimator framework that can be applied on top of any generic GNN backbone network (which are typically designed for supervised/semi-supervised node classification) to improve the node classification performance. A neural network is used to model the Uncertainty Estimator as a probability distribution rather than probabilistic discrete scalar values. We train these models under the classic episodic learning paradigm in the $n$-way, $k$-shot fashion, in an end-to-end setting. Our work demonstrates that implementation of the uncertainty estimator on a GNN backbone network improves the classification accuracy under Few-shot setting without any meta-learning specific architecture. We conduct experiments on multiple datasets under different Few-shot settings and different GNN-based backbone networks. Our method outperforms the baselines, which demonstrates the efficacy of the Uncertainty Estimator for Few-shot node classification on graphs with a GNN.
6/12/2024