Understanding Adam Optimizer via Online Learning of Updates: Adam is FTRL in Disguise

Read original: arXiv:2402.01567 - Published 5/31/2024 by Kwangjun Ahn, Zhiyu Zhang, Yunbum Kook, Yan Dai
Total Score

0

🤔

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a new perspective on the theoretical understanding of the Adam optimizer, a popular algorithm used in machine learning.
  • The authors show that Adam can be viewed as a principled online learning framework called Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL), which has been studied extensively in the online learning literature.
  • By connecting Adam to FTRL, the authors are able to shed light on the benefits of Adam's algorithmic components from an online learning perspective.

Plain English Explanation

The Adam optimizer is a widely used algorithm in machine learning, but its inner workings are not fully understood. Most existing analyses show that Adam's performance can be achieved by simpler, non-adaptive algorithms like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD).

In this paper, the authors take a different approach. They view the design of a good optimizer as the design of a good online learner. Online learning is a framework where an algorithm makes a series of decisions and receives feedback, gradually improving its performance.

The key insight is that Adam corresponds to a specific type of online learner called Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL). By making this connection, the authors can analyze Adam's algorithmic components, such as its adaptive learning rates, from the perspective of online learning theory.

This new viewpoint helps explain why Adam can outperform simpler optimizers like SGD in certain scenarios. It also suggests ways to further improve the algorithm by drawing on the extensive research in online learning and adaptive gradient methods.

Technical Explanation

The authors build on the recent work of Cutkosky et al. (2023), which introduced the framework of online learning of updates/increments. In this framework, the goal is to design an optimizer that chooses updates or increments based on an online learner.

The key observation is that Adam can be viewed as a specific instance of this framework, where the online learner is the Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL) algorithm. FTRL is a well-studied online learning algorithm that has been shown to have strong theoretical guarantees.

By making this connection, the authors are able to analyze the benefits of Adam's algorithmic components, such as its adaptive learning rates, from the perspective of online learning theory. They show that Adam's performance can be explained by the properties of the FTRL algorithm, which suggests ways to further improve the optimizer.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a novel and insightful analysis of the Adam optimizer, but there are a few caveats to consider:

  1. The paper focuses on the theoretical understanding of Adam, but does not directly address its empirical performance. While the online learning perspective offers valuable insights, it would be helpful to see how these insights translate to practical improvements in machine learning tasks.

  2. The analysis assumes certain conditions, such as convex objectives and bounded gradients, that may not always hold in real-world applications. It would be useful to understand how the results generalize to more challenging settings.

  3. The paper does not discuss potential limitations or drawbacks of the FTRL framework for designing optimizers. It would be interesting to explore alternative online learning approaches and compare their strengths and weaknesses.

Overall, this research offers a fresh and promising direction for understanding the Adam optimizer. By connecting it to the well-studied field of online learning, the authors have opened up new avenues for further research and potential algorithm improvements.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel perspective on the Adam optimizer, a widely used algorithm in machine learning. By showing that Adam corresponds to a principled online learning framework called Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL), the authors are able to shed light on the benefits of Adam's algorithmic components.

This new viewpoint helps explain why Adam can outperform simpler optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent in certain scenarios. It also suggests ways to further improve the algorithm by drawing on the extensive research in online learning and adaptive gradient methods.

While the analysis has some caveats, it offers a promising direction for enhancing our theoretical understanding of Adam and other optimizers. By continuing to explore the connections between optimization and online learning, researchers may uncover additional insights that lead to more robust and effective algorithms for machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤔

Total Score

0

Understanding Adam Optimizer via Online Learning of Updates: Adam is FTRL in Disguise

Kwangjun Ahn, Zhiyu Zhang, Yunbum Kook, Yan Dai

Despite the success of the Adam optimizer in practice, the theoretical understanding of its algorithmic components still remains limited. In particular, most existing analyses of Adam show the convergence rate that can be simply achieved by non-adative algorithms like SGD. In this work, we provide a different perspective based on online learning that underscores the importance of Adam's algorithmic components. Inspired by Cutkosky et al. (2023), we consider the framework called online learning of updates/increments, where we choose the updates/increments of an optimizer based on an online learner. With this framework, the design of a good optimizer is reduced to the design of a good online learner. Our main observation is that Adam corresponds to a principled online learning framework called Follow-the-Regularized-Leader (FTRL). Building on this observation, we study the benefits of its algorithmic components from the online learning perspective.

Read more

5/31/2024

Total Score

0

Discounted Adaptive Online Learning: Towards Better Regularization

Zhiyu Zhang, David Bombara, Heng Yang

We study online learning in adversarial nonstationary environments. Since the future can be very different from the past, a critical challenge is to gracefully forget the history while new data comes in. To formalize this intuition, we revisit the discounted regret in online convex optimization, and propose an adaptive (i.e., instance optimal), FTRL-based algorithm that improves the widespread non-adaptive baseline -- gradient descent with a constant learning rate. From a practical perspective, this refines the classical idea of regularization in lifelong learning: we show that designing good regularizers can be guided by the principled theory of adaptive online optimization. Complementing this result, we also consider the (Gibbs and Cand`es, 2021)-style online conformal prediction problem, where the goal is to sequentially predict the uncertainty sets of a black-box machine learning model. We show that the FTRL nature of our algorithm can simplify the conventional gradient-descent-based analysis, leading to instance-dependent performance guarantees.

Read more

6/21/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Studying K-FAC Heuristics by Viewing Adam through a Second-Order Lens

Ross M. Clarke, Jos'e Miguel Hern'andez-Lobato

Research into optimisation for deep learning is characterised by a tension between the computational efficiency of first-order, gradient-based methods (such as SGD and Adam) and the theoretical efficiency of second-order, curvature-based methods (such as quasi-Newton methods and K-FAC). Noting that second-order methods often only function effectively with the addition of stabilising heuristics (such as Levenberg-Marquardt damping), we ask how much these (as opposed to the second-order curvature model) contribute to second-order algorithms' performance. We thus study AdamQLR: an optimiser combining damping and learning rate selection techniques from K-FAC (Martens & Grosse, 2015) with the update directions proposed by Adam, inspired by considering Adam through a second-order lens. We evaluate AdamQLR on a range of regression and classification tasks at various scales and hyperparameter tuning methodologies, concluding K-FAC's adaptive heuristics are of variable standalone general effectiveness, and finding an untuned AdamQLR setting can achieve comparable performance vs runtime to tuned benchmarks.

Read more

6/17/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Convergence of Distributed Adaptive Optimization with Local Updates

Ziheng Cheng, Margalit Glasgow

We study distributed adaptive algorithms with local updates (intermittent communication). Despite the great empirical success of adaptive methods in distributed training of modern machine learning models, the theoretical benefits of local updates within adaptive methods, particularly in terms of reducing communication complexity, have not been fully understood yet. In this paper, we prove that em Local SGD em with momentum (em Local em SGDM) and em Local em Adam can outperform their minibatch counterparts in convex and weakly convex settings, respectively. Our analysis relies on a novel technique to prove contraction during local iterations, which is a crucial but challenging step to show the advantages of local updates, under generalized smoothness assumption and gradient clipping.

Read more

9/23/2024