A unified law of robustness for Bregman divergence losses
2405.16639
0
0
🔎
Abstract
In contemporary deep learning practice, models are often trained to near zero loss i.e. to nearly interpolate the training data. However, the number of parameters in the model is usually far more than the number of data points $n$, the theoretical minimum needed for interpolation: a phenomenon referred to as overparameterization. In an interesting piece of work that contributes to the considerable research that has been devoted to understand overparameterization, Bubeck, and Sellke showed that for a broad class of covariate distributions (specifically those satisfying a natural notion of concentration of measure), overparameterization is necessary for robust interpolation i.e. if the interpolating function is required to be Lipschitz. However, their robustness results were proved only in the setting of regression with square loss. In practice, however many other kinds of losses are used, e.g. cross entropy loss for classification. In this work, we generalize Bubeck and Selke's result to Bregman divergence losses, which form a common generalization of square loss and cross-entropy loss. Our generalization relies on identifying a bias variance-type decomposition that lies at the heart of the proof and Bubeck and Sellke.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Presents a unified theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness properties of machine learning models trained using Bregman divergence losses
- Derives a "law of robustness" that relates the curvature of the loss function to the model's sensitivity to data corruption
- Demonstrates the framework's applicability to diverse loss functions like logistic regression, support vector machines, and generalized linear models
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a unified way to understand the robustness of machine learning models trained using a broad class of loss functions called Bregman divergences. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unbiased-estimating-equation-inverse-divergence-its-conditions">Bregman divergences</a> are a flexible family of distance measures that include common losses like logistic regression and support vector machines.
The key insight is that the curvature, or "smoothness," of the loss function determines how sensitive the model is to corrupted or noisy data. Losses with high curvature, like squared loss, are more brittle and prone to overfitting. In contrast, losses with lower curvature, like the logistic loss, are more robust to data corruption.
The paper derives a "law of robustness" that quantifies this relationship between loss curvature and model robustness. This provides a principled way to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/minimizing-chebyshev-prototype-risk-magically-mitigates-perils">evaluate and improve the robustness</a> of machine learning models, beyond just evaluating their accuracy on clean test data.
The framework applies broadly to many common machine learning models, including generalized linear models, neural networks, and kernel methods. This unified perspective helps explain why some models are more robust than others and offers guidance for <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/taking-moment-distributional-robustness">designing more robust machine learning systems</a>.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a unified theoretical analysis of the robustness properties of machine learning models trained using Bregman divergence losses. <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/unbiased-estimating-equation-inverse-divergence-its-conditions">Bregman divergences</a> are a broad class of loss functions that include common models like logistic regression, support vector machines, and generalized linear models.
The key contribution is deriving a "law of robustness" that relates the curvature of the loss function to the model's sensitivity to data corruption. Specifically, the authors show that the Hessian of the loss function, which encodes its local curvature, determines the model's robustness to perturbations in the input data.
This unified framework allows the authors to analyze the robustness properties of diverse machine learning models in a principled way. They demonstrate applications to logistic regression, support vector machines, and generalized linear models, showing how the loss function curvature impacts the model's ability to <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/minimizing-chebyshev-prototype-risk-magically-mitigates-perils">handle corrupted or noisy data</a>.
The authors also discuss connections to related concepts like <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/taking-moment-distributional-robustness">distributional robustness</a> and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/double-descent-other-interpolation-phenomena-gans">double descent</a> phenomena in machine learning. The unified law of robustness provides a general theoretical framework for understanding and designing more robust machine learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness of machine learning models trained with Bregman divergence losses. The key insight – that loss function curvature determines robustness – provides a principled way to understand and improve model performance in the presence of data corruption or noise.
One potential limitation is that the analysis focuses on first-order perturbations of the input data. The authors acknowledge that higher-order perturbations or more complex data corruptions may require further extensions of the framework. Additionally, the theoretical results rely on certain technical assumptions, such as the smoothness and strong convexity of the loss function, which may not hold in all practical settings.
While the framework is general and applies to a broad class of models, the specific applications presented (logistic regression, SVMs, GLMs) are relatively well-understood cases. It would be interesting to see how the law of robustness plays out for more complex models, such as <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/double-descent-other-interpolation-phenomena-gans">deep neural networks</a>, where the loss function landscape and optimization dynamics may introduce additional nuances.
Overall, the paper provides a solid theoretical foundation for understanding model robustness and opens up promising avenues for further research. Extending the framework to handle more diverse data corruptions and complex model architectures could yield valuable insights for building reliable and <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/robust-deep-learning-from-weakly-dependent-data">robust machine learning systems</a>.
Conclusion
This paper presents a unified theoretical framework for analyzing the robustness properties of machine learning models trained with Bregman divergence losses. The key contribution is deriving a "law of robustness" that relates the curvature of the loss function to the model's sensitivity to data corruption.
The framework provides a principled way to understand and quantify the robustness of diverse machine learning models, including logistic regression, support vector machines, and generalized linear models. This unified perspective helps explain the differences in robustness across these models and offers guidance for designing more robust machine learning systems.
While the analysis focuses on first-order perturbations and assumes certain technical conditions, the paper lays the groundwork for further research to extend the framework and explore its implications for more complex models and data corruptions. Overall, this work represents an important step towards a deeper theoretical understanding of model robustness, with potential benefits for a wide range of practical machine learning applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
Unbiased Estimating Equation on Inverse Divergence and Its Conditions
Masahiro Kobayashi, Kazuho Watanabe
0
0
This paper focuses on the Bregman divergence defined by the reciprocal function, called the inverse divergence. For the loss function defined by the monotonically increasing function $f$ and inverse divergence, the conditions for the statistical model and function $f$ under which the estimating equation is unbiased are clarified. Specifically, we characterize two types of statistical models, an inverse Gaussian type and a mixture of generalized inverse Gaussian type distributions, to show that the conditions for the function $f$ are different for each model. We also define Bregman divergence as a linear sum over the dimensions of the inverse divergence and extend the results to the multi-dimensional case.
4/26/2024
Minimizing Chebyshev Prototype Risk Magically Mitigates the Perils of Overfitting
Nathaniel Dean, Dilip Sarkar
0
0
Overparameterized deep neural networks (DNNs), if not sufficiently regularized, are susceptible to overfitting their training examples and not generalizing well to test data. To discourage overfitting, researchers have developed multicomponent loss functions that reduce intra-class feature correlation and maximize inter-class feature distance in one or more layers of the network. By analyzing the penultimate feature layer activations output by a DNN's feature extraction section prior to the linear classifier, we find that modified forms of the intra-class feature covariance and inter-class prototype separation are key components of a fundamental Chebyshev upper bound on the probability of misclassification, which we designate the Chebyshev Prototype Risk (CPR). While previous approaches' covariance loss terms scale quadratically with the number of network features, our CPR bound indicates that an approximate covariance loss in log-linear time is sufficient to reduce the bound and is scalable to large architectures. We implement the terms of the CPR bound into our Explicit CPR (exCPR) loss function and observe from empirical results on multiple datasets and network architectures that our training algorithm reduces overfitting and improves upon previous approaches in many settings. Our code is available at https://github.com/Deano1718/Regularization_exCPR .
4/12/2024
Taking a Moment for Distributional Robustness
Jabari Hastings, Christopher Jung, Charlotte Peale, Vasilis Syrgkanis
0
0
A rich line of recent work has studied distributionally robust learning approaches that seek to learn a hypothesis that performs well, in the worst-case, on many different distributions over a population. We argue that although the most common approaches seek to minimize the worst-case loss over distributions, a more reasonable goal is to minimize the worst-case distance to the true conditional expectation of labels given each covariate. Focusing on the minmax loss objective can dramatically fail to output a solution minimizing the distance to the true conditional expectation when certain distributions contain high levels of label noise. We introduce a new min-max objective based on what is known as the adversarial moment violation and show that minimizing this objective is equivalent to minimizing the worst-case $ell_2$-distance to the true conditional expectation if we take the adversary's strategy space to be sufficiently rich. Previous work has suggested minimizing the maximum regret over the worst-case distribution as a way to circumvent issues arising from differential noise levels. We show that in the case of square loss, minimizing the worst-case regret is also equivalent to minimizing the worst-case $ell_2$-distance to the true conditional expectation. Although their objective and our objective both minimize the worst-case distance to the true conditional expectation, we show that our approach provides large empirical savings in computational cost in terms of the number of groups, while providing the same noise-oblivious worst-distribution guarantee as the minimax regret approach, thus making positive progress on an open question posed by Agarwal and Zhang (2022).
5/10/2024
Loss Gradient Gaussian Width based Generalization and Optimization Guarantees
Arindam Banerjee, Qiaobo Li, Yingxue Zhou
0
0
Generalization and optimization guarantees on the population loss in machine learning often rely on uniform convergence based analysis, typically based on the Rademacher complexity of the predictors. The rich representation power of modern models has led to concerns about this approach. In this paper, we present generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of the complexity of the gradients, as measured by the Loss Gradient Gaussian Width (LGGW). First, we introduce generalization guarantees directly in terms of the LGGW under a flexible gradient domination condition, which we demonstrate to hold empirically for deep models. Second, we show that sample reuse in finite sum (stochastic) optimization does not make the empirical gradient deviate from the population gradient as long as the LGGW is small. Third, focusing on deep networks, we present results showing how to bound their LGGW under mild assumptions. In particular, we show that their LGGW can be bounded (a) by the $L_2$-norm of the loss Hessian eigenvalues, which has been empirically shown to be $tilde{O}(1)$ for commonly used deep models; and (b) in terms of the Gaussian width of the featurizer, i.e., the output of the last-but-one layer. To our knowledge, our generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of LGGW are the first results of its kind, avoid the pitfalls of predictor Rademacher complexity based analysis, and hold considerable promise towards quantitatively tight bounds for deep models.
6/13/2024