Uniform Pessimistic Risk and Optimal Portfolio
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses the challenge of estimating optimal portfolios using pessimistic risk measures, which consider the worst-case scenario.
- It proposes a new risk measure called "uniform pessimistic risk" and an algorithm to find optimal portfolios based on this risk.
- The paper analyzes the theoretical properties of the proposed risk measure using three different approaches.
- Real-world data analysis on three stock datasets demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed risk measure and portfolio model.
Plain English Explanation
When investing, it's important to consider the potential risks and try to minimize the worst-case scenarios. One approach to this is using pessimistic risk measures, which focus on the downside risk rather than the average or expected return.
The paper introduces a new type of pessimistic risk measure called "uniform pessimistic risk." This measure looks at the risk across different levels of confidence, rather than just a single worst-case scenario. The researchers also develop an algorithm to help find the optimal portfolio using this new risk measure.
To understand the properties of this new risk measure, the paper examines it from three different angles:
- Multiple quantile regression, which looks at risk at different quantiles of the distribution
- Proper scoring rules, which provide a way to evaluate the quality of the risk measure
- Distributionally robust optimization, which considers uncertainty in the underlying probability distribution
The researchers then test their new risk measure and portfolio optimization approach on real stock market data from the S&P 500, CSI 500, and KOSPI 200 indexes. This demonstrates the practical usefulness of their proposals.
Technical Explanation
The paper addresses the challenge of estimating optimal portfolios using pessimistic risk measures, which focus on downside risk rather than just expected return. The key contribution is the introduction of a new risk measure called "uniform pessimistic risk" and an algorithm to find optimal portfolios based on this risk.
The uniform pessimistic risk is an integral of the α-risk, which is a broad class of pessimistic risk measures. This new risk measure looks at the risk across different levels of confidence, rather than just a single worst-case scenario. The researchers develop a computationally tractable model to optimize portfolios using this risk measure.
To analyze the theoretical properties of the proposed risk measure, the paper explores three different approaches:
- Multiple quantile regression - This examines the risk at different quantiles of the return distribution.
- Proper scoring rules - This provides a way to evaluate the quality of the risk measure.
- Distributionally robust optimization - This considers uncertainty in the underlying probability distribution.
The real-world data analysis on three stock market indexes (S&P 500, CSI 500, KOSPI 200) demonstrates the practical usefulness of the proposed risk measure and portfolio optimization approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and theoretically sound approach to portfolio optimization using a new pessimistic risk measure. The analysis of the uniform pessimistic risk through multiple quantile regression, proper scoring rules, and distributionally robust optimization provides a comprehensive understanding of its properties.
However, the paper does not address the potential computational complexity of the proposed optimization algorithm, which could be a limitation for large-scale applications. Additionally, the paper could have provided more discussion on the sensitivity of the optimal portfolios to the choice of the risk measure parameters, as this could be an important consideration for practitioners.
Furthermore, the real-world data analysis, while demonstrating the usefulness of the approach, could be expanded to include a more diverse set of asset classes or market conditions to better assess the robustness of the proposed method.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of portfolio optimization under pessimistic risk measures, and the proposed uniform pessimistic risk and optimization algorithm warrant further exploration and refinement.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new pessimistic risk measure called "uniform pessimistic risk" and an algorithm to find optimal portfolios based on this risk. The paper provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the proposed risk measure and demonstrates its practical usefulness through real-world data analysis.
The uniform pessimistic risk offers a more nuanced approach to downside risk management, considering risk across different levels of confidence rather than just a single worst-case scenario. The theoretical analysis and the real-world results suggest that this new risk measure and optimization approach could be a valuable tool for investors and portfolio managers seeking to minimize the potential for significant losses.
While the paper presents a solid foundation, further research could explore the computational efficiency of the optimization algorithm and the sensitivity of the optimal portfolios to the choice of risk measure parameters. Expanding the data analysis to a wider range of asset classes and market conditions would also help to validate the robustness of the proposed method.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Uniform Pessimistic Risk and Optimal Portfolio
Sungchul Hong, Jong-June Jeon
The optimal allocation of assets has been widely discussed with the theoretical analysis of risk measures, and pessimism is one of the most attractive approaches beyond the conventional optimal portfolio model. The $alpha$-risk plays a crucial role in deriving a broad class of pessimistic optimal portfolios. However, estimating an optimal portfolio assessed by a pessimistic risk is still challenging due to the absence of a computationally tractable model. In this study, we propose an integral of $alpha$-risk called the textit{uniform pessimistic risk} and the computational algorithm to obtain an optimal portfolio based on the risk. Further, we investigate the theoretical properties of the proposed risk in view of three different approaches: multiple quantile regression, the proper scoring rule, and distributionally robust optimization. Real data analysis of three stock datasets (S&P500, CSI500, KOSPI200) demonstrates the usefulness of the proposed risk and portfolio model.
Read more5/20/2024
0
Robust portfolio optimization for recommender systems considering uncertainty of estimated statistics
Tomoya Yanagi, Shunnosuke Ikeda, Yuichi Takano
This paper is concerned with portfolio optimization models for creating high-quality lists of recommended items to balance the accuracy and diversity of recommendations. However, the statistics (i.e., expectation and covariance of ratings) required for mean--variance portfolio optimization are subject to inevitable estimation errors. To remedy this situation, we focus on robust optimization techniques that derive reliable solutions to uncertain optimization problems. Specifically, we propose a robust portfolio optimization model that copes with the uncertainty of estimated statistics based on the cardinality-based uncertainty sets. This robust portfolio optimization model can be reduced to a mixed-integer linear optimization problem, which can be solved exactly using mathematical optimization solvers. Experimental results using two publicly available rating datasets demonstrate that our method can improve not only the recommendation accuracy but also the diversity of recommendations compared with conventional mean--variance portfolio optimization models. Notably, our method has the potential to improve the recommendation quality of various rating prediction algorithms.
Read more6/18/2024
⚙️
0
Risk-Adaptive Approaches to Stochastic Optimization: A Survey
Johannes O. Royset
Uncertainty is prevalent in engineering design, data-driven problems, and decision making broadly. Due to inherent risk-averseness and ambiguity about assumptions, it is common to address uncertainty by formulating and solving conservative optimization models expressed using measures of risk and related concepts. We survey the rapid development of risk measures over the last quarter century. From their beginning in financial engineering, we recount the spread to nearly all areas of engineering and applied mathematics. Solidly rooted in convex analysis, risk measures furnish a general framework for handling uncertainty with significant computational and theoretical advantages. We describe the key facts, list several concrete algorithms, and provide an extensive list of references for further reading. The survey recalls connections with utility theory and distributionally robust optimization, points to emerging applications areas such as fair machine learning, and defines measures of reliability.
Read more4/5/2024
0
Unified PAC-Bayesian Study of Pessimism for Offline Policy Learning with Regularized Importance Sampling
Imad Aouali, Victor-Emmanuel Brunel, David Rohde, Anna Korba
Off-policy learning (OPL) often involves minimizing a risk estimator based on importance weighting to correct bias from the logging policy used to collect data. However, this method can produce an estimator with a high variance. A common solution is to regularize the importance weights and learn the policy by minimizing an estimator with penalties derived from generalization bounds specific to the estimator. This approach, known as pessimism, has gained recent attention but lacks a unified framework for analysis. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive PAC-Bayesian framework to examine pessimism with regularized importance weighting. We derive a tractable PAC-Bayesian generalization bound that universally applies to common importance weight regularizations, enabling their comparison within a single framework. Our empirical results challenge common understanding, demonstrating the effectiveness of standard IW regularization techniques.
Read more6/6/2024