Unlearning Trojans in Large Language Models: A Comparison Between Natural Language and Source Code
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers investigate the ability of large language models to "unlearn" or remove unwanted behaviors like Trojans.
- They compare the unlearning process for natural language tasks vs. source code tasks.
- Key findings provide insights into the challenges of safely removing unwanted capabilities from powerful AI models.
Plain English Explanation
The provided paper explores the ability of large language models, like GPT-3, to "unlearn" or remove unwanted behaviors that have been introduced, such as Trojans. Trojans are hidden, malicious capabilities that can be secretly embedded into AI models.
The researchers compared how well the models could unlearn these unwanted behaviors when the tasks involved natural language versus source code. This is an important distinction, as natural language and code have different structural properties that may impact the unlearning process.
The main goal was to understand the challenges and trade-offs involved in safely removing undesirable capabilities from powerful AI systems, which is a critical issue as these models become more advanced and widely deployed. The findings provide insights that can inform future efforts to robustly and efficiently unlearn unwanted knowledge in large language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper first outlines the researchers' contributions, which include:
- Designing and evaluating techniques for unlearning Trojans in large language models across natural language and source code tasks.
- Providing a comparative analysis of the unlearning process for the two task domains.
- Identifying key challenges and limitations in the unlearning of Trojans in large language models.
To evaluate unlearning, the researchers first trained language models with Trojans embedded in the natural language or source code tasks. They then applied various unlearning techniques, such as fine-tuning and knowledge distillation, to see how effectively the models could remove the unwanted behaviors.
The results showed that unlearning Trojans was generally more difficult in the source code domain compared to natural language. This was attributed to the more structured and compositional nature of code, which makes it harder to selectively remove specific behaviors.
The paper also discusses other factors that can impact the unlearning process, such as the scale of the model, the type of Trojan, and the specific unlearning technique used. These insights highlight the challenges involved in safely and efficiently unlearning unwanted capabilities in powerful AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed investigation into the challenging problem of unlearning Trojans in large language models. However, it also acknowledges several important limitations and caveats:
- The study focuses on a relatively narrow set of Trojan types and unlearning techniques, and the findings may not generalize to other scenarios.
- The experiments were conducted on a single language model architecture (GPT-3), and the results could differ for other model types or sizes.
- The researchers note that the unlearning process can be highly sensitive to hyperparameters and other implementation details, which were not explored in depth.
Additionally, the paper does not address some broader concerns about the security and robustness of large language models, such as the potential for adversarial attacks or the difficulty of verifying the absence of unwanted behaviors. Further research is needed to fully understand the challenges and develop reliable solutions for safely deploying these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The provided paper offers valuable insights into the challenges of unlearning unwanted behaviors, such as Trojans, in large language models. By comparing the unlearning process for natural language and source code tasks, the researchers have identified key differences and limitations that can inform future efforts to develop robust and efficient techniques for removing undesirable capabilities from these powerful AI systems. As large language models continue to advance and become more widely deployed, addressing these security and safety concerns will be crucial for ensuring their responsible and beneficial use in a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Unlearning Trojans in Large Language Models: A Comparison Between Natural Language and Source Code
Mahdi Kazemi, Aftab Hussain, Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Mohammad Amin Alipour, Sen Lin
This work investigates the application of Machine Unlearning (MU) for mitigating the impact of trojans embedded in conventional large language models of natural language (Text-LLMs) and large language models of code (Code-LLMs) We propose a novel unlearning approach, LYA, that leverages both gradient ascent and elastic weight consolidation, a Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) based regularization technique, to unlearn trojans from poisoned models. We compare the effectiveness of LYA against conventional techniques like fine-tuning, retraining, and vanilla gradient ascent. The subject models we investigate are BERT and CodeBERT, for sentiment analysis and code defect detection tasks, respectively. Our findings demonstrate that the combination of gradient ascent and FIM-based regularization, as done in LYA, outperforms existing methods in removing the trojan's influence from the poisoned model, while preserving its original functionality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that compares and contrasts MU of trojans in LLMs, in the NL and Coding domain.
Read more8/23/2024
0
Trojans in Large Language Models of Code: A Critical Review through a Trigger-Based Taxonomy
Aftab Hussain, Md Rafiqul Islam Rabin, Toufique Ahmed, Bowen Xu, Premkumar Devanbu, Mohammad Amin Alipour
Large language models (LLMs) have provided a lot of exciting new capabilities in software development. However, the opaque nature of these models makes them difficult to reason about and inspect. Their opacity gives rise to potential security risks, as adversaries can train and deploy compromised models to disrupt the software development process in the victims' organization. This work presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art trojan attacks on large language models of code, with a focus on triggers -- the main design point of trojans -- with the aid of a novel unifying trigger taxonomy framework. We also aim to provide a uniform definition of the fundamental concepts in the area of trojans in Code LLMs. Finally, we draw implications of findings on how code models learn on trigger design.
Read more5/7/2024
0
If You Don't Understand It, Don't Use It: Eliminating Trojans with Filters Between Layers
Adriano Hernandez
Large language models (LLMs) sometimes exhibit dangerous unintended behaviors. Finding and fixing these is challenging because the attack surface is massive -- it is not tractable to exhaustively search for all possible inputs that may elicit such behavior. One specific and particularly challenging case is that if data-poisoning-injected trojans, since there is no way to know what they are to search for them. To our knowledge, there is no generally applicable method to unlearn unknown trojans injected during pre-training. This work seeks to provide a general purpose recipe (filters) and a specific implementation (LoRA) filters that work in practice on small to medium sized models. The focus is primarily empirical, though some perplexing behavior opens the door to the fundamental question of how LLMs store and process information. Not unexpectedly, we find that our filters work best on the residual stream and the latest layers.
Read more7/10/2024
0
Machine Unlearning in Large Language Models
Saaketh Koundinya Gundavarapu, Shreya Agarwal, Arushi Arora, Chandana Thimmalapura Jagadeeshaiah
Machine unlearning, a novel area within artificial intelligence, focuses on addressing the challenge of selectively forgetting or reducing undesirable knowledge or behaviors in machine learning models, particularly in the context of large language models (LLMs). This paper introduces a methodology to align LLMs, such as Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models, with ethical, privacy, and safety standards by leveraging the gradient ascent algorithm for knowledge unlearning. Our approach aims to selectively erase or modify learned information in LLMs, targeting harmful responses and copyrighted content. This paper presents a dual-pronged approach to enhance the ethical and safe behavior of large language models (LLMs) by addressing the issues of harmful responses and copyrighted content. To mitigate harmful responses, we applied gradient ascent on the PKU dataset, achieving a 75% reduction in harmful responses for Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models (OPT1.3b and OPT2.7b) citet{zhang2022opt} while retaining previous knowledge using the TruthfulQA dataset citet{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2109-07958}. For handling copyrighted content, we constructed a custom dataset based on the Lord of the Rings corpus and aligned LLMs (OPT1.3b and OPT2.7b) citet{zhang2022opt} through LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models citet{DBLP:journals/corr/abs-2106-09685} finetuning. Subsequently, we employed gradient ascent to unlearn the Lord of the Rings content, resulting in a remarkable reduction in the presence of copyrighted material. To maintain a diverse knowledge base, we utilized the Book Corpus dataset. Additionally, we propose a new evaluation technique for assessing the effectiveness of harmful unlearning.
Read more5/27/2024