Unraveling the Autism spectrum heterogeneity: Insights from ABIDE I Database using data/model-driven permutation testing approaches

Read original: arXiv:2405.12225 - Published 5/22/2024 by F. J. Alcaide, I. A. Illan, J. Ramirez, J. M. Gorriz

🧪

Overview

This paper examines how variations in imaging protocols across different research centers influence the observed differences between individuals with Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) and neurotypical individuals.
The study focuses on structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I (ABIDE I) database, analyzing subjects' condition and individual centers to identify disparities between ASC and control groups.
The analysis employs two distinct statistical mapping methods: Statistical Agnostic Mapping (SAM) and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) to evaluate the data.

Plain English Explanation

Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) is a neurological condition that can affect a person's communication, social interaction, and behavior. Researchers have extensively studied the differences between individuals with ASC and those who are neurotypical (without the condition). However, there has been limited attention given to understanding how the way the brain images are acquired (the imaging protocols) at different research centers can impact the observed differences.

This study looked at brain imaging data from the ABIDE I database, which contains sMRI scans from individuals with ASC and those without the condition. The researchers used two different statistical analysis methods to compare the brain structure between the two groups, taking into account the individual research centers where the data was collected.

The results of the analysis did not show any statistically significant differences in brain structure between the ASC and control groups. The researchers attribute this to factors such as small sample sizes within certain centers, the presence of noise in the data, and the inherent heterogeneity (diversity) of the autism spectrum condition.

In essence, this study suggests that the ABIDE I database may have limitations in its ability to reliably detect structural differences in the brain between neurotypical individuals and those diagnosed with ASC. The researchers also found that the SAM mapping method showed greater consistency with existing literature on the topic.

Technical Explanation

The study utilized sMRI data from the ABIDE I database, which contains brain scans from individuals with ASC and neurotypical controls. The researchers employed two distinct statistical mapping methods to analyze the data:

Statistical Agnostic Mapping (SAM): This method takes a more exploratory approach, without making assumptions about the underlying structure of the data.
Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM): This method is a hypothesis-driven approach, which assumes a specific statistical model for the data.

The analysis aimed to identify any structural differences in the brain between the ASC and control groups, while also considering the potential impact of the individual research centers where the data was collected.

The results of the study did not reveal any statistically significant differences in brain structure between the ASC and control groups. The researchers attribute this to several factors, including:

Limited sample sizes within certain research centers
The presence of noise in the data
The inherent heterogeneity of the autism spectrum condition

These findings suggest limitations in using the ABIDE I database to reliably detect structural differences in the brain between neurotypical individuals and those diagnosed with ASC. The researchers also found that the SAM mapping method showed greater consistency with existing literature on the topic.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the challenges of using multi-site neuroimaging data, such as the ABIDE I database, to investigate structural differences in the brain between individuals with ASC and neurotypical controls.

One of the key limitations highlighted in the paper is the potential impact of varying imaging protocols across different research centers. This heterogeneity in data acquisition can introduce noise and confounding factors that may obscure the underlying neurological differences between the two groups. The authors acknowledge that further research is needed to better understand how these methodological factors influence the observed differences, or lack thereof, in brain structure.

Additionally, the study's reliance on relatively small sample sizes within certain centers may have limited its statistical power to detect meaningful effects. This is a common challenge in autism research, where the inherent heterogeneity of the condition can make it difficult to obtain large, homogeneous samples.

The paper also raises important questions about the suitability of the ABIDE I database for this type of analysis. While the database provides a valuable resource for autism research, the authors' findings suggest that it may have limitations in its ability to reliably identify structural brain differences between ASC and neurotypical individuals.

Despite these limitations, the study's use of two distinct statistical mapping methods (SAM and SPM) provides a more comprehensive approach to data analysis. The authors' observation that the SAM method showed greater consistency with existing literature is an interesting finding that warrants further investigation.

Conclusion

This study highlights the challenges of using multi-site neuroimaging data to investigate structural differences in the brains of individuals with Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) compared to neurotypical controls. The authors' analysis of the ABIDE I database did not reveal any statistically significant differences in brain structure, which they attribute to factors such as limited sample sizes, noise in the data, and the inherent heterogeneity of the autism spectrum.

The findings suggest that the ABIDE I database may have limitations in its ability to reliably detect structural brain differences between ASC and neurotypical individuals. The study also underscores the importance of considering the impact of variations in imaging protocols across different research centers when conducting multi-site neuroimaging studies.

While the results of this study do not provide a clear-cut answer to the question of structural brain differences in ASC, they highlight the need for more comprehensive, multi-faceted approaches to autism research. By addressing the methodological challenges identified in this paper, future studies may be better equipped to uncover the underlying neurological signatures of this complex and diverse condition.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧪

Unraveling the Autism spectrum heterogeneity: Insights from ABIDE I Database using data/model-driven permutation testing approaches

F. J. Alcaide, I. A. Illan, J. Ramirez, J. M. Gorriz

Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impairments in communication, social interaction and restricted or repetitive behaviors. Extensive research has been conducted to identify distinctions between individuals with ASC and neurotypical individuals. However, limited attention has been given to comprehensively evaluating how variations in image acquisition protocols across different centers influence these observed differences. This analysis focuses on structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange I (ABIDE I) database, evaluating subjects' condition and individual centers to identify disparities between ASC and control groups. Statistical analysis, employing permutation tests, utilizes two distinct statistical mapping methods: Statistical Agnostic Mapping (SAM) and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM). Results reveal the absence of statistically significant differences in any brain region, attributed to factors such as limited sample sizes within certain centers, noise effects and the problem of multicentrism in a heterogeneous condition such as autism. This study indicates limitations in using the ABIDE I database to detect structural differences in the brain between neurotypical individuals and those diagnosed with ASC. Furthermore, results from the SAM mapping method show greater consistency with existing literature.

5/22/2024

MADE-for-ASD: A Multi-Atlas Deep Ensemble Network for Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder

Xuehan Liu, Md Rakibul Hasan, Tom Gedeon, Md Zakir Hossain

In response to the global need for efficient early diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), this paper bridges the gap between traditional, time-consuming diagnostic methods and potential automated solutions. We propose a multi-atlas deep ensemble network, MADE-for-ASD, that integrates multiple atlases of the brain's functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data through a weighted deep ensemble network. Our approach integrates demographic information into the prediction workflow, which enhances ASD diagnosis performance and offers a more holistic perspective on patient profiling. We experiment with the well-known publicly available ABIDE (Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange) I dataset, consisting of resting state fMRI data from 17 different laboratories around the globe. Our proposed system achieves 75.20% accuracy on the entire dataset and 96.40% on a specific subset $-$ both surpassing reported ASD diagnosis accuracy in ABIDE I fMRI studies. Specifically, our model improves by 4.4 percentage points over prior works on the same amount of data. The model exhibits a sensitivity of 82.90% and a specificity of 69.70% on the entire dataset, and 91.00% and 99.50%, respectively, on the specific subset. We leverage the F-score to pinpoint the top 10 ROI in ASD diagnosis, such as precuneus and anterior cingulate/ventromedial. The proposed system can potentially pave the way for more cost-effective, efficient and scalable strategies in ASD diagnosis. Codes and evaluations are publicly available at https://github.com/hasan-rakibul/MADE-for-ASD.

9/5/2024

$Ensemble Modeling of Multiple Physical Indicators to Dynamically Phenotype Autism Spectrum Disorder$

Ensemble Modeling of Multiple Physical Indicators to Dynamically Phenotype Autism Spectrum Disorder

Marie Huynh (Stanford University), Aaron Kline (Stanford University), Saimourya Surabhi (Stanford University), Kaitlyn Dunlap (Stanford University), Onur Cezmi Mutlu (Stanford University), Mohammadmahdi Honarmand (Stanford University), Parnian Azizian (Stanford University), Peter Washington (University of Hawaii at Manoa), Dennis P. Wall (Stanford University)

Early detection of autism, a neurodevelopmental disorder marked by social communication challenges, is crucial for timely intervention. Recent advancements have utilized naturalistic home videos captured via the mobile application GuessWhat. Through interactive games played between children and their guardians, GuessWhat has amassed over 3,000 structured videos from 382 children, both diagnosed with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This collection provides a robust dataset for training computer vision models to detect ASD-related phenotypic markers, including variations in emotional expression, eye contact, and head movements. We have developed a protocol to curate high-quality videos from this dataset, forming a comprehensive training set. Utilizing this set, we trained individual LSTM-based models using eye gaze, head positions, and facial landmarks as input features, achieving test AUCs of 86%, 67%, and 78%, respectively. To boost diagnostic accuracy, we applied late fusion techniques to create ensemble models, improving the overall AUC to 90%. This approach also yielded more equitable results across different genders and age groups. Our methodology offers a significant step forward in the early detection of ASD by potentially reducing the reliance on subjective assessments and making early identification more accessibly and equitable.

8/26/2024

Automatic Voice Classification Of Autistic Subjects

Jessica Vacca, Natascia Brondino, Fabio Dell'Acqua, Anna Vizziello, Pietro Savazzi

Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) describe a heterogeneous set of conditions classified as neurodevelopmental disorders. Although the mechanisms underlying ASD are not yet fully understood, more recent literature focused on multiple genetics and/or environmental risk factors. Heterogeneity of symptoms, especially in milder forms of this condition, could be a challenge for the clinician. In this work, an automatic speech classification algorithm is proposed to characterize the prosodic elements that best distinguish autism, to support the traditional diagnosis. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluted by testing the classification algorithms on a dataset composed of recorded speeches, collected among both autustic and non autistic subjects.

6/21/2024