U.S. Election Hardens Hate Universe
2405.00459
0
0
Abstract
Local or national politics can trigger potentially dangerous hate in someone. But with a third of the world's population eligible to vote in elections in 2024 alone, we lack understanding of how individual-level hate multiplies up to hate behavior at the collective global scale. Here we show, based on the most recent U.S. election, that offline events are associated with a rapid adaptation of the global online hate universe that hardens (strengthens) both its network-of-networks structure and the 'flavors' of hate content that it collectively produces. Approximately 50 million potential voters in hate communities are drawn closer to each other and to the broad mainstream of approximately 2 billion others. It triggers new hate content at scale around immigration, ethnicity, and antisemitism that aligns with conspiracy theories about Jewish-led replacement before blending in hate around gender identity/sexual orientation, and religion. Telegram acts as a key hardening agent - yet is overlooked by U.S. Congressional hearings and new E.U. legislation. Because the hate universe has remained robust since 2020, anti-hate messaging surrounding not only upcoming elections but also other events like the war in Gaza, should pivot to blending multiple hate 'flavors' while targeting previously untouched social media structures.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the relationship between the 2022 U.S. election and the spread of hate speech and misinformation on social media.
- The researchers analyze data from various online platforms to understand how polarizing political events can contribute to the propagation of harmful and divisive content.
- The findings provide insights into the complex dynamics between electoral processes, social media discourse, and the potential risks to societal cohesion.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how the heated political climate surrounding the 2022 U.S. election may have exacerbated the spread of hate speech and misinformation on social media platforms. By analyzing data from various online sources, the researchers aim to shed light on the interplay between polarizing electoral events and the proliferation of harmful and divisive content.
The research provides valuable insights into the intricate relationship between the democratic process, social media discourse, and the potential threats to societal unity. As political tensions often run high during elections, this study investigates how such an environment can contribute to the amplification of hateful and false narratives, which can have far-reaching consequences for social cohesion and public discourse.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the online landscape during the 2022 U.S. election, with a particular focus on the prevalence and dynamics of hate speech and misinformation. The researchers utilized a multi-pronged approach, leveraging data from numerous social media platforms as well as other online sources to gain a holistic understanding of the problem.
Key aspects of the study include:
-
Data Collection and Preprocessing: The researchers collected a vast dataset of online content, including posts, comments, and interactions, across various platforms. They employed advanced data processing and filtering techniques to identify and categorize relevant hate speech and misinformation.
-
Computational Analysis: The team developed a robust computational framework to analyze the collected data, leveraging machine learning algorithms and natural language processing techniques to uncover patterns, trends, and correlations.
-
Multimodal Examination: In addition to textual analysis, the researchers incorporated multimodal approaches to examine the interplay between different content types, such as images, videos, and memes, and their role in amplifying hateful and misleading narratives.
-
Temporal and Geospatial Insights: The study also explored the temporal and geospatial dimensions of the observed phenomena, revealing how the proliferation of hate speech and misinformation evolved over time and across different regions.
The findings of this research provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamics at play, highlighting the urgent need to address the challenges posed by the intersection of electoral processes, social media, and the propagation of harmful content. The insights gleaned from this study can inform future mitigation strategies and contribute to the ongoing efforts to foster a healthier online environment.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have conducted a thorough and well-designed study, leveraging a diverse range of data sources and advanced analytical techniques to investigate the relationship between the 2022 U.S. election and the spread of hate speech and misinformation on social media.
However, it is important to note that the study is limited to the specific time period and context of the 2022 election. While the findings offer valuable insights, the researchers acknowledge that the dynamics observed may not be generalizable to other electoral events or time frames. Additionally, the reliance on platform-provided data and the inherent biases within online discourse could potentially impact the representativeness of the findings.
Furthermore, the researchers highlight the need for further research to delve deeper into the underlying drivers and mechanisms behind the observed phenomena. Exploring the role of algorithms, the influence of political actors, and the interplay between online and offline factors could provide additional nuance and understanding.
It is also crucial to consider the ethical implications of this research and the potential risks of uncovering and disseminating insights about the propagation of hate speech and misinformation. Careful consideration should be given to the responsible use of such findings to avoid unintended consequences or the potential for exploitation by malicious actors.
Conclusion
The paper offers a comprehensive examination of the relationship between the 2022 U.S. election and the spread of hate speech and misinformation on social media. The researchers' findings provide valuable insights into the complex dynamics at the intersection of electoral processes, social media discourse, and the potential threats to societal cohesion.
The study's multi-faceted approach, leveraging diverse data sources and advanced analytical techniques, contributes to our understanding of how polarizing political events can exacerbate the proliferation of harmful and divisive content online. These insights can inform future efforts to address the challenges posed by the intersection of democracy, technology, and societal well-being.
As we navigate the evolving landscape of online discourse and the impact of political events, this research serves as a crucial stepping stone towards developing more effective strategies to promote healthy and inclusive public dialogue, safeguard democratic institutions, and foster greater social harmony.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Grounding Toxicity in Real-World Events across Languages
Wondimagegnhue Tsegaye Tufa, Ilia Markov, Piek Vossen
0
0
Social media conversations frequently suffer from toxicity, creating significant issues for users, moderators, and entire communities. Events in the real world, like elections or conflicts, can initiate and escalate toxic behavior online. Our study investigates how real-world events influence the origin and spread of toxicity in online discussions across various languages and regions. We gathered Reddit data comprising 4.5 million comments from 31 thousand posts in six different languages (Dutch, English, German, Arabic, Turkish and Spanish). We target fifteen major social and political world events that occurred between 2020 and 2023. We observe significant variations in toxicity, negative sentiment, and emotion expressions across different events and language communities, showing that toxicity is a complex phenomenon in which many different factors interact and still need to be investigated. We will release the data for further research along with our code.
5/24/2024
Exploring Boundaries and Intensities in Offensive and Hate Speech: Unveiling the Complex Spectrum of Social Media Discourse
Abinew Ali Ayele, Esubalew Alemneh Jalew, Adem Chanie Ali, Seid Muhie Yimam, Chris Biemann
0
0
The prevalence of digital media and evolving sociopolitical dynamics have significantly amplified the dissemination of hateful content. Existing studies mainly focus on classifying texts into binary categories, often overlooking the continuous spectrum of offensiveness and hatefulness inherent in the text. In this research, we present an extensive benchmark dataset for Amharic, comprising 8,258 tweets annotated for three distinct tasks: category classification, identification of hate targets, and rating offensiveness and hatefulness intensities. Our study highlights that a considerable majority of tweets belong to the less offensive and less hate intensity levels, underscoring the need for early interventions by stakeholders. The prevalence of ethnic and political hatred targets, with significant overlaps in our dataset, emphasizes the complex relationships within Ethiopia's sociopolitical landscape. We build classification and regression models and investigate the efficacy of models in handling these tasks. Our results reveal that hate and offensive speech can not be addressed by a simplistic binary classification, instead manifesting as variables across a continuous range of values. The Afro-XLMR-large model exhibits the best performances achieving F1-scores of 75.30%, 70.59%, and 29.42% for the category, target, and regression tasks, respectively. The 80.22% correlation coefficient of the Afro-XLMR-large model indicates strong alignments.
4/19/2024
💬
Moderating New Waves of Online Hate with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models
Nishant Vishwamitra, Keyan Guo, Farhan Tajwar Romit, Isabelle Ondracek, Long Cheng, Ziming Zhao, Hongxin Hu
0
0
Online hate is an escalating problem that negatively impacts the lives of Internet users, and is also subject to rapid changes due to evolving events, resulting in new waves of online hate that pose a critical threat. Detecting and mitigating these new waves present two key challenges: it demands reasoning-based complex decision-making to determine the presence of hateful content, and the limited availability of training samples hinders updating the detection model. To address this critical issue, we present a novel framework called HATEGUARD for effectively moderating new waves of online hate. HATEGUARD employs a reasoning-based approach that leverages the recently introduced chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting technique, harnessing the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). HATEGUARD further achieves prompt-based zero-shot detection by automatically generating and updating detection prompts with new derogatory terms and targets in new wave samples to effectively address new waves of online hate. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, we compile a new dataset consisting of tweets related to three recently witnessed new waves: the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, the 2021 insurrection of the US Capitol, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Our studies reveal crucial longitudinal patterns in these new waves concerning the evolution of events and the pressing need for techniques to rapidly update existing moderation tools to counteract them. Comparative evaluations against state-of-the-art tools illustrate the superiority of our framework, showcasing a substantial 22.22% to 83.33% improvement in detecting the three new waves of online hate. Our work highlights the severe threat posed by the emergence of new waves of online hate and represents a paradigm shift in addressing this threat practically.
5/13/2024
🗣️
Toxic Synergy Between Hate Speech and Fake News Exposure
Munjung Kim, Tuu{g}rulcan Elmas, Filippo Menczer
0
0
Hate speech on social media is a pressing concern. Understanding the factors associated with hate speech may help mitigate it. Here we explore the association between hate speech and exposure to fake news by studying the correlation between exposure to news from low-credibility sources through following connections and the use of hate speech on Twitter. Using news source credibility labels and a dataset of posts with hate speech targeting various populations, we find that hate speakers are exposed to lower percentages of posts linking to credible news sources. When taking the target population into account, we find that this association is mainly driven by anti-semitic and anti-Muslim content. We also observe that hate speakers are more likely to be exposed to low-credibility news with low popularity. Finally, while hate speech is associated with low-credibility news from partisan sources, we find that those sources tend to skew to the political left for antisemitic content and to the political right for hate speech targeting Muslim and Latino populations. Our results suggest that mitigating fake news and hate speech may have synergistic effects.
4/15/2024