Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forward
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the use of AI-based coding assistants in software development practice.
- It explores the current state of these tools, perceptions of developers, and potential ways to improve their adoption and effectiveness.
- The research involved a large-scale survey of software developers to understand their experiences and perspectives on AI coding assistants.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how software developers are using AI-powered tools to help with their coding tasks. These AI assistants can provide suggestions, complete code snippets, or even generate entire programs based on natural language descriptions. The researchers wanted to understand the current state of these AI coding tools - how widely they are being used, what developers think about them, and what could be done to make them more useful and accepted in the industry.
To do this, the researchers conducted a large survey of software developers to get their perspectives. They asked questions about things like [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ai-tutoring-software-engineering-education] how often developers use AI assistants, what types of tasks they use them for, what they see as the benefits and drawbacks, and how the tools could be improved.
The goal was to get a clear picture of the current landscape around AI coding assistants, including [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/desirable-characteristics-ai-teaching-assistants-programming-education] what developers find most helpful or problematic about them. This information can then be used to guide the development of better, more practical AI tools for software engineering in the future.
Technical Explanation
The researchers carried out a large-scale survey of software developers to understand their experiences and perceptions regarding the use of AI-based coding assistants in practice. The survey collected responses from over 2,000 developers across a range of industries, roles, and experience levels.
The survey instrument included questions covering topics such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/knowledge-component-based-methodology-evaluating-ai-assistants] the frequency and contexts of AI assistant usage, the types of tasks developers employ them for, their perceived benefits and drawbacks, and ideas for improving the technology. The responses were then analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and key insights.
The results show that while AI coding assistants are gaining traction, with over 60% of respondents reporting regular use, there are also significant concerns and limitations. Developers highlight issues around [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ai-assisted-assessment-coding-practices-modern-code] code quality, security, and reliability when using these tools. There is also a need for better integration with existing workflows and development environments.
The paper discusses potential ways to address these challenges, such as [internal link: https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/61a-bot-ai-homework-assistance-cs1-is] improving the transparency and explainability of AI-generated code, strengthening security and compliance guardrails, and developing more contextual and personalized AI assistants. Overall, the findings provide valuable insights to guide the ongoing evolution and adoption of AI-based coding tools in software engineering practice.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI-based coding assistants and developers' perceptions of these tools. The large-scale survey offers a robust empirical foundation for understanding the challenges and opportunities surrounding the use of AI in software development.
However, the research does not delve deeply into the technical details or underlying architectures of the AI models and systems powering these coding assistants. More information on the specific approaches, capabilities, and limitations of the AI technologies themselves would help provide a more complete picture.
Additionally, the paper primarily focuses on the developer perspective, but there may be other important stakeholders, such as managers, IT security teams, or end-users, whose views and concerns should also be considered. Expanding the scope of the research to capture a broader range of perspectives could yield additional insights.
While the paper outlines several potential ways to address the identified challenges, more extensive exploration and validation of these solutions would strengthen the recommendations. Empirical studies or prototypes demonstrating the viability and effectiveness of the proposed improvements would add further credibility.
Overall, this paper represents a valuable contribution to the understanding of AI-based coding assistants in practice. The findings and suggestions provide a solid foundation for continued research and development to enhance the adoption and effectiveness of these emerging technologies in software engineering.
Conclusion
This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI-based coding assistants and their use in software development practice. Through a large-scale survey of over 2,000 developers, the researchers gained valuable insights into the perceived benefits, limitations, and areas for improvement of these AI tools.
The results show that while AI coding assistants are gaining traction, with over 60% of respondents reporting regular use, there are also significant concerns around code quality, security, and reliability. Developers highlighted the need for better integration with existing workflows and development environments, as well as improved transparency and explainability of AI-generated code.
The paper outlines potential ways to address these challenges, such as strengthening security and compliance guardrails, and developing more contextual and personalized AI assistants. These insights can guide the ongoing evolution and adoption of AI-based coding tools in software engineering practice, ultimately enhancing the productivity and effectiveness of developers.
Overall, this research provides a solid foundation for continued exploration and development of AI-powered coding assistants, with the goal of unlocking their full potential to support software engineers in their daily tasks and workflows.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Using AI-Based Coding Assistants in Practice: State of Affairs, Perceptions, and Ways Forward
Agnia Sergeyuk, Yaroslav Golubev, Timofey Bryksin, Iftekhar Ahmed
The last several years saw the emergence of AI assistants for code -- multi-purpose AI-based helpers in software engineering. Their quick development makes it necessary to better understand how specifically developers are using them, why they are not using them in certain parts of their development workflow, and what needs to be improved. In this work, we carried out a large-scale survey aimed at how AI assistants are used, focusing on specific software development activities and stages. We collected opinions of 481 programmers on five broad activities: (a) implementing new features, (b) writing tests, (c) bug triaging, (d) refactoring, and (e) writing natural-language artifacts, as well as their individual stages. Our results show that usage of AI assistants varies depending on activity and stage. For instance, developers find writing tests and natural-language artifacts to be the least enjoyable activities and want to delegate them the most, currently using AI assistants to generate tests and test data, as well as generating comments and docstrings most of all. This can be a good focus for features aimed to help developers right now. As for why developers do not use assistants, in addition to general things like trust and company policies, there are fixable issues that can serve as a guide for further research, e.g., the lack of project-size context, and lack of awareness about assistants. We believe that our comprehensive and specific results are especially needed now to steer active research toward where users actually need AI assistants.
Read more6/13/2024
🔍
0
Future of Artificial Intelligence in Agile Software Development
Mariyam Mahboob, Mohammed Rayyan Uddin Ahmed, Zoiba Zia, Mariam Shakeel Ali, Ayman Khaleel Ahmed
The advent of Artificial intelligence has promising advantages that can be utilized to transform the landscape of software project development. The Software process framework consists of activities that constantly require routine human interaction, leading to the possibility of errors and uncertainties. AI can assist software development managers, software testers, and other team members by leveraging LLMs, GenAI models, and AI agents to perform routine tasks, risk analysis and prediction, strategy recommendations, and support decision making. AI has the potential to increase efficiency and reduce the risks encountered by the project management team while increasing the project success rates. Additionally, it can also break down complex notions and development processes for stakeholders to make informed decisions. In this paper, we propose an approach in which AI tools and technologies can be utilized to bestow maximum assistance for agile software projects, which have become increasingly favored in the industry in recent years.
Read more8/2/2024
0
AI-Tutoring in Software Engineering Education
Eduard Frankford, Clemens Sauerwein, Patrick Bassner, Stephan Krusche, Ruth Breu
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in various domains, the education sector is set for transformation. The potential of AI-driven tools in enhancing the learning experience, especially in programming, is immense. However, the scientific evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) used in Automated Programming Assessment Systems (APASs) as an AI-Tutor remains largely unexplored. Therefore, there is a need to understand how students interact with such AI-Tutors and to analyze their experiences. In this paper, we conducted an exploratory case study by integrating the GPT-3.5-Turbo model as an AI-Tutor within the APAS Artemis. Through a combination of empirical data collection and an exploratory survey, we identified different user types based on their interaction patterns with the AI-Tutor. Additionally, the findings highlight advantages, such as timely feedback and scalability. However, challenges like generic responses and students' concerns about a learning progress inhibition when using the AI-Tutor were also evident. This research adds to the discourse on AI's role in education.
Read more4/8/2024
🤖
0
Desirable Characteristics for AI Teaching Assistants in Programming Education
Paul Denny, Stephen MacNeil, Jaromir Savelka, Leo Porter, Andrew Luxton-Reilly
Providing timely and personalized feedback to large numbers of students is a long-standing challenge in programming courses. Relying on human teaching assistants (TAs) has been extensively studied, revealing a number of potential shortcomings. These include inequitable access for students with low confidence when needing support, as well as situations where TAs provide direct solutions without helping students to develop their own problem-solving skills. With the advent of powerful large language models (LLMs), digital teaching assistants configured for programming contexts have emerged as an appealing and scalable way to provide instant, equitable, round-the-clock support. Although digital TAs can provide a variety of help for programming tasks, from high-level problem solving advice to direct solution generation, the effectiveness of such tools depends on their ability to promote meaningful learning experiences. If students find the guardrails implemented in digital TAs too constraining, or if other expectations are not met, they may seek assistance in ways that do not help them learn. Thus, it is essential to identify the features that students believe make digital teaching assistants valuable. We deployed an LLM-powered digital assistant in an introductory programming course and collected student feedback ($n=813$) on the characteristics of the tool they perceived to be most important. Our results highlight that students value such tools for their ability to provide instant, engaging support, particularly during peak times such as before assessment deadlines. They also expressed a strong preference for features that enable them to retain autonomy in their learning journey, such as scaffolding that helps to guide them through problem-solving steps rather than simply being shown direct solutions.
Read more5/24/2024