Using an Evolutionary Algorithm to Create (MAX)-3SAT QUBOs

2405.09272

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/16/2024 by Sebastian Zielinski, Maximilian Zorn, Thomas Gabor, Sebastian Feld, Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
Using an Evolutionary Algorithm to Create (MAX)-3SAT QUBOs

Abstract

A common way of solving satisfiability instances with quantum methods is to transform these instances into instances of QUBO, which in itself is a potentially difficult and expensive task. State-of-the-art transformations from MAX-3SAT to QUBO currently work by mapping clauses of a 3SAT formula associated with the MAX-3SAT instance to an instance of QUBO and combining the resulting QUBOs into a single QUBO instance representing the whole MAX-3SAT instance. As creating these transformations is currently done manually or via exhaustive search methods and, therefore, algorithmically inefficient, we see potential for including search-based optimization. In this paper, we propose two methods of using evolutionary algorithms to automatically create QUBO representations of MAX-3SAT problems. We evaluate our created QUBOs on 500 and 1000-clause 3SAT formulae and find competitive performance to state-of-the-art baselines when using both classical and quantum annealing solvers.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores using an evolutionary algorithm to create (MAX)-3SAT QUBOs (Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization problems).
  • (MAX)-3SAT is a combinatorial optimization problem where the goal is to find the maximum number of satisfied clauses in a 3-satisfiability problem.
  • QUBOs are a type of optimization problem that can be solved using quantum computing techniques.
  • The authors propose an evolutionary algorithm approach to generating QUBO problems that can be used to benchmark and evaluate quantum optimization algorithms.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about using a special kind of computer algorithm called an evolutionary algorithm to create a certain type of optimization problem called a (MAX)-3SAT QUBO. [An evolutionary algorithm is inspired by the process of natural selection, where the "best" solutions are kept and used to generate new, potentially better solutions.]

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/towards-robust-benchmarking-quantum-optimization-algorithms">Optimization problems</a> are tasks where you try to find the best possible solution, like the shortest route between two places or the most efficient way to schedule a set of tasks. (MAX)-3SAT is a specific type of optimization problem where you try to satisfy as many clauses as possible in a logical formula with 3 variables per clause.

A QUBO is a way of representing an optimization problem that is well-suited for solving on quantum computers. [Quantum computers use the weird properties of quantum physics, like superposition and entanglement, to potentially solve certain types of problems faster than classical computers.] By using an evolutionary algorithm to create (MAX)-3SAT QUBOs, the authors aim to generate benchmark problems that can be used to test and evaluate different quantum optimization algorithms.

Technical Explanation

The authors propose an evolutionary algorithm approach to generating QUBO problems that can be used to benchmark and evaluate quantum optimization algorithms. They start with a population of random (MAX)-3SAT instances and then use genetic operators like mutation and crossover to evolve the instances over multiple generations, selecting for instances that have a large number of satisfied clauses (i.e., are "harder" optimization problems).

The evolutionary process iteratively generates new (MAX)-3SAT instances, evaluates their "fitness" (i.e., the number of satisfied clauses), and then selects the fittest instances to use as parents for the next generation. This allows the algorithm to gradually produce (MAX)-3SAT instances that are more challenging optimization problems, which can then be converted into QUBO form for use in benchmarking quantum optimization algorithms.

The authors evaluate their approach by comparing the performance of quantum and classical optimization algorithms on the generated (MAX)-3SAT QUBO instances. They find that the evolutionary algorithm is able to produce instances that are challenging for both quantum and classical solvers, demonstrating the potential of this approach for generating robust benchmarking problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to generating benchmark problems for evaluating quantum optimization algorithms. By using an evolutionary algorithm to create (MAX)-3SAT instances that are challenging optimizations problems, the authors are able to generate QUBOs that can stress-test quantum algorithms in ways that randomly generated instances may not.

<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/towards-robust-benchmarking-quantum-optimization-algorithms">However, the authors acknowledge that their approach has some limitations</a>. The generated instances may not be representative of real-world optimization problems, and the evolutionary process may introduce biases or structural patterns that could be exploited by certain algorithms. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of the approach as the problem size increases.

Further research could investigate ways to make the generated instances more diverse and realistic, or to incorporate additional constraints or objectives into the evolutionary process. Validating the generated QUBOs against a wider range of quantum and classical optimization algorithms would also help strengthen the conclusions.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to generating challenging (MAX)-3SAT QUBO instances using an evolutionary algorithm. The generated instances can be used to benchmark and evaluate quantum optimization algorithms, potentially helping to identify their strengths and weaknesses. While the approach has some limitations, it demonstrates the potential of using evolutionary techniques to create robust optimization problems for quantum computing research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

An Analysis of Quantum Annealing Algorithms for Solving the Maximum Clique Problem

An Analysis of Quantum Annealing Algorithms for Solving the Maximum Clique Problem

Alessandro Gherardi, Alberto Leporati

YC

0

Reddit

0

Quantum annealers can be used to solve many (possibly NP-hard) combinatorial optimization problems, by formulating them as quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems or, equivalently, using the Ising formulation. In this paper we analyse the ability of quantum D-Wave annealers to find the maximum clique on a graph, expressed as a QUBO problem. Due to the embedding limit of 164 nodes imposed by the anneler, we conducted a study on graph decomposition to enable instance embedding. We thus propose a decomposition algorithm for the complementary maximum independent set problem, and a graph generation algorithm to control the number of nodes, the number of cliques, the density, the connectivity indices and the ratio of the solution size to the number of other nodes. We then statistically analysed how these variables affect the quality of the solutions found by the quantum annealer. The results of our investigation include recommendations on ratio and density limits not to be exceeded, as well as a series of precautions and a priori analyses to be carried out in order to maximise the probability of obtaining a solution close to the optimum.

Read more

6/13/2024

Towards an Automatic Framework for Solving Optimization Problems with Quantum Computers

Towards an Automatic Framework for Solving Optimization Problems with Quantum Computers

Deborah Volpe, Nils Quetschlich, Mariagrazia Graziano, Giovanna Turvani, Robert Wille

YC

0

Reddit

0

Optimizing objective functions stands to benefit significantly from leveraging quantum computers, promising enhanced solution quality across various application domains in the future. However, harnessing the potential of quantum solvers necessitates formulating problems according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model, demanding significant expertise in quantum computation and QUBO formulations. This expertise barrier limits access to quantum solutions. Fortunately, automating the conversion of conventional optimization problems into QUBO formulations presents a solution for promoting accessibility to quantum solvers. This article addresses the unmet need for a comprehensive automatic framework to assist users in utilizing quantum solvers for optimization tasks while preserving interfaces that closely resemble conventional optimization practices. The framework prompts users to specify variables, optimization criteria, as well as validity constraints and, afterwards, allows them to choose the desired solver. Subsequently, it automatically transforms the problem description into a format compatible with the chosen solver and provides the resulting solution. Additionally, the framework offers instruments for analyzing solution validity and quality. Comparative analysis against existing libraries and tools in the literature highlights the comprehensive nature of the proposed framework. Two use cases (the knapsack problem and linear regression) are considered to show the completeness and efficiency of the framework in real-world applications. Finally, the proposed framework represents a significant advancement towards automating quantum computing solutions and widening access to quantum optimization for a broader range of users.

Read more

6/19/2024

🛠️

Evidence of Scaling Advantage for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on a Classically Intractable Problem

Ruslan Shaydulin, Changhao Li, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Matthew DeCross, Dylan Herman, Niraj Kumar, Jeffrey Larson, Danylo Lykov, Pierre Minssen, Yue Sun, Yuri Alexeev, Joan M. Dreiling, John P. Gaebler, Thomas M. Gatterman, Justin A. Gerber, Kevin Gilmore, Dan Gresh, Nathan Hewitt, Chandler V. Horst, Shaohan Hu, Jacob Johansen, Mitchell Matheny, Tanner Mengle, Michael Mills, Steven A. Moses, Brian Neyenhuis, Peter Siegfried, Romina Yalovetzky, Marco Pistoia

YC

0

Reddit

0

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a leading candidate algorithm for solving optimization problems on quantum computers. However, the potential of QAOA to tackle classically intractable problems remains unclear. Here, we perform an extensive numerical investigation of QAOA on the low autocorrelation binary sequences (LABS) problem, which is classically intractable even for moderately sized instances. We perform noiseless simulations with up to 40 qubits and observe that the runtime of QAOA with fixed parameters scales better than branch-and-bound solvers, which are the state-of-the-art exact solvers for LABS. The combination of QAOA with quantum minimum finding gives the best empirical scaling of any algorithm for the LABS problem. We demonstrate experimental progress in executing QAOA for the LABS problem using an algorithm-specific error detection scheme on Quantinuum trapped-ion processors. Our results provide evidence for the utility of QAOA as an algorithmic component that enables quantum speedups.

Read more

6/4/2024

Utilising a Quantum Hybrid Solver for Bi-objective Quadratic Assignment Problems

Utilising a Quantum Hybrid Solver for Bi-objective Quadratic Assignment Problems

Mayowa Ayodele

YC

0

Reddit

0

The intersection between quantum computing and optimisation has been an area of interest in recent years. There have been numerous studies exploring the application of quantum and quantum-hybrid solvers to various optimisation problems. This work explores scalarisation methods within the context of solving the bi-objective quadratic assignment problem using a quantum-hybrid solver. We show results that are consistent with previous research on a different Ising machine.

Read more

5/29/2024