Using LLMs in Software Requirements Specifications: An Empirical Evaluation

2404.17842

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 4/30/2024 by Madhava Krishna, Bhagesh Gaur, Arsh Verma, Pankaj Jalote
Using LLMs in Software Requirements Specifications: An Empirical Evaluation

Abstract

The creation of a Software Requirements Specification (SRS) document is important for any software development project. Given the recent prowess of Large Language Models (LLMs) in answering natural language queries and generating sophisticated textual outputs, our study explores their capability to produce accurate, coherent, and structured drafts of these documents to accelerate the software development lifecycle. We assess the performance of GPT-4 and CodeLlama in drafting an SRS for a university club management system and compare it against human benchmarks using eight distinct criteria. Our results suggest that LLMs can match the output quality of an entry-level software engineer to generate an SRS, delivering complete and consistent drafts. We also evaluate the capabilities of LLMs to identify and rectify problems in a given requirements document. Our experiments indicate that GPT-4 is capable of identifying issues and giving constructive feedback for rectifying them, while CodeLlama's results for validation were not as encouraging. We repeated the generation exercise for four distinct use cases to study the time saved by employing LLMs for SRS generation. The experiment demonstrates that LLMs may facilitate a significant reduction in development time for entry-level software engineers. Hence, we conclude that the LLMs can be gainfully used by software engineers to increase productivity by saving time and effort in generating, validating and rectifying software requirements.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) in the creation of software requirements specifications (SRS).
  • The researchers conducted an empirical evaluation to assess the effectiveness of LLMs in generating and enhancing SRS documents.
  • The study examines the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating LLMs into the requirements engineering process.

Plain English Explanation

In this paper, the researchers investigated how large language models (LLMs) can be used to assist in creating software requirements specifications (SRS). SRS documents are essential for defining the features and functionality of software systems, and they are typically developed through a careful process involving multiple stakeholders.

The researchers wanted to explore whether LLMs, which are advanced AI models that can generate human-like text, could be leveraged to streamline and improve the SRS creation process. They conducted an empirical evaluation, which means they carried out a systematic study to gather and analyze data on the use of LLMs in this context.

The goal was to understand the potential benefits and challenges of incorporating LLMs into the requirements engineering process. For example, LLMs might be able to help generate initial drafts of SRS documents or assist in the documentation of software code and features. However, there might also be limitations or concerns that need to be addressed.

By conducting this empirical evaluation, the researchers aimed to provide insights that could guide the integration of LLMs into the requirements engineering process and help software development teams leverage these powerful AI models more effectively.

Technical Explanation

The researchers carried out a series of experiments to evaluate the use of LLMs in the context of software requirements specifications. They focused on assessing the performance of LLMs in generating and enhancing SRS documents, as well as analyzing the perceived quality and usefulness of the LLM-generated content.

The study involved participants with experience in requirements engineering, who were asked to engage with LLM-assisted SRS generation and provide feedback. The researchers also analyzed the characteristics and capabilities of the LLMs used, such as their ability to generate relevant code documentation and handle diverse types of software requirements.

The key findings of the study include insights into the strengths and limitations of using LLMs in the requirements engineering process, as well as the potential challenges and considerations that need to be addressed when integrating these models into software development workflows.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed empirical evaluation of the use of LLMs in the context of software requirements specifications. The researchers have carefully considered the potential benefits and drawbacks of incorporating these advanced AI models into the requirements engineering process.

One potential limitation highlighted in the paper is the need to further investigate the long-term reliability and consistency of LLM-generated SRS content. There may be concerns about the accuracy and stability of the generated text, as well as potential biases or errors that could be introduced.

Additionally, the study focused primarily on the generation and enhancement of SRS documents, but there may be other aspects of the requirements engineering process that could also be impacted by the use of LLMs, such as stakeholder communication, requirements elicitation, and traceability. Further research in these areas could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of LLM integration.

Overall, the paper presents a valuable contribution to the understanding of LLM applications in software development and highlights the need for ongoing research and careful consideration of the potential benefits and challenges involved.

Conclusion

This empirical evaluation of using large language models (LLMs) in the creation of software requirements specifications (SRS) provides important insights for the field of requirements engineering.

The researchers have demonstrated the potential of LLMs to streamline and enhance the SRS development process, but have also identified key challenges and considerations that need to be addressed. As the use of LLMs in software development continues to evolve, this study serves as a valuable reference point for understanding the opportunities and limitations of incorporating these advanced AI models into the requirements engineering workflow.

The findings from this paper can help guide software teams in exploring the integration of LLMs and inform future research on the role of LLMs in supporting the creation and management of software requirements specifications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Model Generation from Requirements with LLMs: an Exploratory Study

Model Generation from Requirements with LLMs: an Exploratory Study

Alessio Ferrari, Sallam Abualhaija, Chetan Arora

YC

0

Reddit

0

Complementing natural language (NL) requirements with graphical models can improve stakeholders' communication and provide directions for system design. However, creating models from requirements involves manual effort. The advent of generative large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT being a notable example, offers promising avenues for automated assistance in model generation. This paper investigates the capability of ChatGPT to generate a specific type of model, i.e., UML sequence diagrams, from NL requirements. We conduct a qualitative study in which we examine the sequence diagrams generated by ChatGPT for 28 requirements documents of various types and from different domains. Observations from the analysis of the generated diagrams have systematically been captured through evaluation logs, and categorized through thematic analysis. Our results indicate that, although the models generally conform to the standard and exhibit a reasonable level of understandability, their completeness and correctness with respect to the specified requirements often present challenges. This issue is particularly pronounced in the presence of requirements smells, such as ambiguity and inconsistency. The insights derived from this study can influence the practical utilization of LLMs in the RE process, and open the door to novel RE-specific prompting strategies targeting effective model generation.

Read more

4/10/2024

šŸ›ø

LLMs for Science: Usage for Code Generation and Data Analysis

Mohamed Nejjar, Luca Zacharias, Fabian Stiehle, Ingo Weber

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) have been touted to enable increased productivity in many areas of today's work life. Scientific research as an area of work is no exception: the potential of LLM-based tools to assist in the daily work of scientists has become a highly discussed topic across disciplines. However, we are only at the very onset of this subject of study. It is still unclear how the potential of LLMs will materialise in research practice. With this study, we give first empirical evidence on the use of LLMs in the research process. We have investigated a set of use cases for LLM-based tools in scientific research, and conducted a first study to assess to which degree current tools are helpful. In this paper we report specifically on use cases related to software engineering, such as generating application code and developing scripts for data analytics. While we studied seemingly simple use cases, results across tools differ significantly. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-based tools in general, yet we also observe various issues, particularly regarding the integrity of the output these tools provide.

Read more

4/24/2024

šŸ’¬

Evaluation of the Programming Skills of Large Language Models

Luc Bryan Heitz, Joun Chamas, Christopher Scherb

YC

0

Reddit

0

The advent of Large Language Models (LLM) has revolutionized the efficiency and speed with which tasks are completed, marking a significant leap in productivity through technological innovation. As these chatbots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the challenge of assessing the quality of their outputs has become paramount. This paper critically examines the output quality of two leading LLMs, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini AI, by comparing the quality of programming code generated in both their free versions. Through the lens of a real-world example coupled with a systematic dataset, we investigate the code quality produced by these LLMs. Given their notable proficiency in code generation, this aspect of chatbot capability presents a particularly compelling area for analysis. Furthermore, the complexity of programming code often escalates to levels where its verification becomes a formidable task, underscoring the importance of our study. This research aims to shed light on the efficacy and reliability of LLMs in generating high-quality programming code, an endeavor that has significant implications for the field of software development and beyond.

Read more

5/24/2024

A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models for Code Documentation Generation

A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models for Code Documentation Generation

Shubhang Shekhar Dvivedi, Vyshnav Vijay, Sai Leela Rahul Pujari, Shoumik Lodh, Dhruv Kumar

YC

0

Reddit

0

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) for generation of code documentation. Code documentation is an essential part of the software writing process. The paper evaluates models such as GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, Llama2, and Starchat on various parameters like Accuracy, Completeness, Relevance, Understandability, Readability and Time Taken for different levels of code documentation. Our evaluation employs a checklist-based system to minimize subjectivity, providing a more objective assessment. We find that, barring Starchat, all LLMs consistently outperform the original documentation. Notably, closed-source models GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Bard exhibit superior performance across various parameters compared to open-source/source-available LLMs, namely LLama 2 and StarChat. Considering the time taken for generation, GPT-4 demonstrated the longest duration, followed by Llama2, Bard, with ChatGPT and Starchat having comparable generation times. Additionally, file level documentation had a considerably worse performance across all parameters (except for time taken) as compared to inline and function level documentation.

Read more

4/30/2024