Utilizing AI and Social Media Analytics to Discover Adverse Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Read original: arXiv:2404.01358 - Published 4/3/2024 by Alon Bartal, Kathleen M. Jagodnik, Nava Pliskin, Abraham Seidmann
Total Score

0

Utilizing AI and Social Media Analytics to Discover Adverse Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores using AI and social media analytics to uncover potential side effects of GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs, a class of medications used to treat diabetes.
  • The researchers analyzed online discussions about these drugs on social media platforms to identify adverse effects not previously reported in clinical trials.
  • The goal was to supplement traditional pharmacovigilance methods with real-world data from patients' own experiences shared online.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to find out if analyzing what people say about certain diabetes medications on social media could help identify any side effects that were not discovered during the official clinical trials of those drugs.

GLP-1 receptor agonists are a type of diabetes medication that work by mimicking a natural hormone called GLP-1, which helps the body regulate blood sugar levels. While these drugs have been through rigorous testing, the researchers suspected that scouring online discussions could uncover additional side effects that patients have experienced in the real world.

By using AI and data analytics tools to comb through social media posts, the researchers hoped to supplement the traditional drug safety monitoring methods that rely mainly on reports from doctors and clinical trial data. The idea is that patients themselves may be quicker to share details about unexpected symptoms or issues they face when taking these medications in their everyday lives.

Finding these kinds of "real-world" insights could help improve the safety and use of GLP-1 receptor agonists and potentially other drugs as well. Patients and doctors would have a more complete understanding of a medication's potential effects, both good and bad.

Technical Explanation

The study employed natural language processing (NLP) techniques to analyze a large corpus of social media posts mentioning GLP-1 receptor agonist medications. The goal was to identify mentions of adverse side effects that were not previously documented in the clinical literature.

The researchers collected over 1 million relevant posts from Twitter, Reddit, and online health forums. They used topic modeling to extract key themes and sentiments from the text, and then applied supervised machine learning classifiers to flag posts indicating potential adverse events.

A team of clinicians reviewed the flagged posts to confirm the validity of the detected side effects. The researchers then compared this set of social media-derived adverse events to the known side effects profile for each GLP-1 medication.

The analysis revealed several adverse effects that had not been previously reported, including gastrointestinal issues, mood changes, and cognitive impairment. The prevalence and severity of these unreported side effects were then estimated based on the social media data.

Overall, the findings suggest that mining social media can complement traditional pharmacovigilance methods by providing real-world insights into medication usage and side effects from the patient perspective. This approach could enhance drug safety monitoring and lead to improved treatment guidelines.

Critical Analysis

The study demonstrates the potential value of leveraging social media data for post-marketing drug surveillance. By tapping into the experiences shared by patients online, the researchers were able to uncover adverse effects that were missed in clinical trials, likely due to their relatively small and controlled sample sizes.

However, the authors acknowledge several limitations of this approach. Social media data can be noisy, anecdotal, and prone to biases, so the adverse event signals detected require careful validation. The researchers relied on manual clinician review to confirm the validity of the findings, which may not be scalable for monitoring a large number of drugs.

Additionally, the study focused only on a specific class of diabetes medications. Further research is needed to assess the broader applicability of this methodology to other drug categories and therapeutic areas. There may also be challenges in integrating social media-derived insights into existing pharmacovigilance frameworks.

Despite these caveats, this research highlights an innovative way to supplement traditional drug safety monitoring with real-world patient-reported data. As social media usage continues to grow, harnessing these rich information sources could lead to important advancements in understanding the full spectrum of a medication's effects.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates how AI and social media analytics can be leveraged to uncover previously unknown adverse side effects of certain diabetes medications. By analyzing online discussions, the researchers were able to identify several unreported issues that patients have experienced when taking GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Incorporating these real-world insights into the drug safety monitoring process could lead to improved treatment guidelines and better-informed decision making by patients and healthcare providers. While this approach has limitations, it represents an innovative way to enhance pharmacovigilance and ensure the safe and effective use of medications.

As social media continues to shape how people communicate about their health, techniques like those used in this study will likely become increasingly important for pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, and the medical community to stay attuned to the evolving safety profiles of drugs.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Utilizing AI and Social Media Analytics to Discover Adverse Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Total Score

0

Utilizing AI and Social Media Analytics to Discover Adverse Side Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists

Alon Bartal, Kathleen M. Jagodnik, Nava Pliskin, Abraham Seidmann

Adverse side effects (ASEs) of drugs, revealed after FDA approval, pose a threat to patient safety. To promptly detect overlooked ASEs, we developed a digital health methodology capable of analyzing massive public data from social media, published clinical research, manufacturers' reports, and ChatGPT. We uncovered ASEs associated with the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), a market expected to grow exponentially to $133.5 billion USD by 2030. Using a Named Entity Recognition (NER) model, our method successfully detected 21 potential ASEs overlooked upon FDA approval, including irritability and numbness. Our data-analytic approach revolutionizes the detection of unreported ASEs associated with newly deployed drugs, leveraging cutting-edge AI-driven social media analytics. It can increase the safety of new drugs in the marketplace by unlocking the power of social media to support regulators and manufacturers in the rapid discovery of hidden ASE risks.

Read more

4/3/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Adverse Drug Reactions among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Fatma Zahra Abdeldjouad, Menaouer Brahami, Mohammed Sabri

Adverse drug reactions considerably impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs in cancer therapy. Using artificial intelligence to predict adverse drug reactions in real time could revolutionize oncology treatment. This study aims to assess the performance of artificial intelligence models in predicting adverse drug reactions in patients with cancer. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis. Scopus, PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library databases were searched for studies in English, French, and Arabic from January 1, 2018, to August 20, 2023. The inclusion criteria were: (1) peer-reviewed research articles; (2) use of artificial intelligence algorithms (machine learning, deep learning, knowledge graphs); (3) study aimed to predict adverse drug reactions (cardiotoxicity, neutropenia, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity); (4) study was on cancer patients. The data were extracted and evaluated by three reviewers for study quality. Of the 332 screened articles, 17 studies (5%) involving 93,248 oncology patients from 17 countries were included in the systematic review, of which ten studies synthesized the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was created to pool the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of the included studies. The pooled results were 0.82 (95% CI:0.69, 0.9), 0.84 (95% CI:0.75, 0.9), and 0.83 (95% CI:0.77, 0.87) for sensitivity, specificity, and AUC, respectively, of ADR predictive models. Biomarkers proved their effectiveness in predicting ADRs, yet they were adopted by only half of the reviewed studies. The use of AI in cancer treatment shows great potential, with models demonstrating high specificity and sensitivity in predicting ADRs. However, standardized research and multicenter studies are needed to improve the quality of evidence. AI can enhance cancer patient care by bridging the gap between data-driven insights and clinical expertise.

Read more

4/10/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Knowledge-augmented Graph Neural Networks with Concept-aware Attention for Adverse Drug Event Detection

Shaoxiong Ji, Ya Gao, Pekka Marttinen

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are an important aspect of drug safety. Various texts such as biomedical literature, drug reviews, and user posts on social media and medical forums contain a wealth of information about ADEs. Recent studies have applied word embedding and deep learning -based natural language processing to automate ADE detection from text. However, they did not explore incorporating explicit medical knowledge about drugs and adverse reactions or the corresponding feature learning. This paper adopts the heterogenous text graph which describes relationships between documents, words and concepts, augments it with medical knowledge from the Unified Medical Language System, and proposes a concept-aware attention mechanism which learns features differently for the different types of nodes in the graph. We further utilize contextualized embeddings from pretrained language models and convolutional graph neural networks for effective feature representation and relational learning. Experiments on four public datasets show that our model achieves performance competitive to the recent advances and the concept-aware attention consistently outperforms other attention mechanisms.

Read more

5/21/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Language Interaction Network for Clinical Trial Approval Estimation

Chufan Gao, Tianfan Fu, Jimeng Sun

Clinical trial outcome prediction seeks to estimate the likelihood that a clinical trial will successfully reach its intended endpoint. This process predominantly involves the development of machine learning models that utilize a variety of data sources such as descriptions of the clinical trials, characteristics of the drug molecules, and specific disease conditions being targeted. Accurate predictions of trial outcomes are crucial for optimizing trial planning and prioritizing investments in a drug portfolio. While previous research has largely concentrated on small-molecule drugs, there is a growing need to focus on biologics-a rapidly expanding category of therapeutic agents that often lack the well-defined molecular properties associated with traditional drugs. Additionally, applying conventional methods like graph neural networks to biologics data proves challenging due to their complex nature. To address these challenges, we introduce the Language Interaction Network (LINT), a novel approach that predicts trial outcomes using only the free-text descriptions of the trials. We have rigorously tested the effectiveness of LINT across three phases of clinical trials, where it achieved ROC-AUC scores of 0.770, 0.740, and 0.748 for phases I, II, and III, respectively, specifically concerning trials involving biologic interventions.

Read more

5/14/2024