VLind-Bench: Measuring Language Priors in Large Vision-Language Models
2406.08702
0
0
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance across various multimodal tasks. However, they suffer from a problem known as language prior, where responses are generated based solely on textual patterns while disregarding image information. Addressing the issue of language prior is crucial, as it can lead to undesirable biases or hallucinations when dealing with images that are out of training distribution. Despite its importance, current methods for accurately measuring language priors in LVLMs are poorly studied. Although existing benchmarks based on counterfactual or out-of-distribution images can partially be used to measure language priors, they fail to disentangle language priors from other confounding factors. To this end, we propose a new benchmark called VLind-Bench, which is the first benchmark specifically designed to measure the language priors, or blindness, of LVLMs. It not only includes tests on counterfactual images to assess language priors but also involves a series of tests to evaluate more basic capabilities such as commonsense knowledge, visual perception, and commonsense biases. For each instance in our benchmark, we ensure that all these basic tests are passed before evaluating the language priors, thereby minimizing the influence of other factors on the assessment. The evaluation and analysis of recent LVLMs in our benchmark reveal that almost all models exhibit a significant reliance on language priors, presenting a strong challenge in the field.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces VLind-Bench, a benchmark for measuring the language priors in large vision-language models (VLMs).
- VLMs are a type of AI model that can understand and generate natural language while also processing visual information.
- The paper explores how the language priors in these models can lead to biases and limitations in their performance on visual tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Vision-language models (VLMs) are a powerful type of AI system that can understand images and text together. These models have shown impressive capabilities, but they also carry hidden biases and limitations due to the language priors they've learned from text data during training.
The VLind-Bench benchmark introduced in this paper aims to uncover these language priors and their impact on VLM performance. By testing the models on a diverse set of visual tasks, the researchers can identify areas where the models' reliance on language biases their understanding of the visual world.
For example, a VLM might excel at describing the contents of an image using common language, but struggle to accurately identify rare or unusual visual concepts that aren't well-represented in the text data it was trained on. The VLind-Bench benchmark helps reveal these types of limitations, allowing researchers to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of these powerful AI systems.
By shedding light on the language biases in VLMs, this research can inform the development of more robust and inclusive vision-language models that are less prone to biased or flawed decision-making. It's an important step towards building AI systems that can truly understand the world around them, rather than just regurgitating patterns from their training data.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the VLind-Bench benchmark, which is designed to measure the language priors in large vision-language models (VLMs). VLMs are a type of AI model that can process both visual and textual information, allowing them to understand and generate natural language while also processing visual data.
The researchers note that while VLMs have shown impressive performance on a variety of tasks, they may also carry hidden biases and limitations due to the language priors they've learned from text data during training. To uncover these biases, the VLind-Bench benchmark tests VLMs on a diverse set of visual tasks, including object detection, semantic segmentation, and visual question answering.
The benchmark includes a carefully curated dataset with a balance of common and rare visual concepts, allowing the researchers to identify areas where the models' reliance on language priors leads to biased or suboptimal performance. The VLind-Bench results reveal that while VLMs excel at tasks that align with their language training, they often struggle with visual concepts that are not well-represented in the text data.
The paper also discusses related research, such as the DiffuSyn-Bench and Uncovering Bias benchmarks, which explore similar issues in VLMs. The authors position their work as a complementary approach that focuses specifically on the impact of language priors on visual understanding.
Critical Analysis
The VLind-Bench benchmark provides a valuable tool for understanding the limitations of current VLMs and their reliance on language priors. By testing the models on a diverse set of visual tasks, the researchers are able to uncover biases and weaknesses that might not be evident from traditional benchmarks.
One potential limitation of the study is the specific dataset and task selection for the VLind-Bench benchmark. While the researchers have made an effort to balance common and rare visual concepts, there may be other aspects of visual understanding that are not fully captured by the chosen tasks.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into potential solutions for mitigating the language priors in VLMs. While the Uncovering Bias and Prismatic VLMs papers explore approaches for addressing bias in VLMs, the VLind-Bench paper focuses more on the identification of these biases.
Overall, the VLind-Bench benchmark represents an important contribution to the field of vision-language modeling, providing researchers and developers with a tool to better understand and mitigate the limitations of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The VLind-Bench benchmark introduced in this paper is a valuable tool for measuring the language priors in large vision-language models (VLMs). By testing these models on a diverse set of visual tasks, the researchers are able to uncover biases and limitations that arise from the models' reliance on language data during training.
This research is an important step towards building more robust and inclusive VLMs that can truly understand the visual world, rather than just regurgitating patterns from their training data. The insights gained from the VLind-Bench benchmark can inform the development of new techniques and architectures to mitigate the impact of language priors and create AI systems that are more equitable and representative of the diverse world we live in.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language Models
Zhiqiu Lin, Xinyue Chen, Deepak Pathak, Pengchuan Zhang, Deva Ramanan
0
0
Vision-language models (VLMs) are impactful in part because they can be applied to a variety of visual understanding tasks in a zero-shot fashion, without any fine-tuning. We study $textit{generative VLMs}$ that are trained for next-word generation given an image. We explore their zero-shot performance on the illustrative task of image-text retrieval across 8 popular vision-language benchmarks. Our first observation is that they can be repurposed for discriminative tasks (such as image-text retrieval) by simply computing the match score of generating a particular text string given an image. We call this probabilistic score the $textit{Visual Generative Pre-Training Score}$ (VisualGPTScore). While the VisualGPTScore produces near-perfect accuracy on some retrieval benchmarks, it yields poor accuracy on others. We analyze this behavior through a probabilistic lens, pointing out that some benchmarks inadvertently capture unnatural language distributions by creating adversarial but unlikely text captions. In fact, we demonstrate that even a blind language model that ignores any image evidence can sometimes outperform all prior art, reminiscent of similar challenges faced by the visual-question answering (VQA) community many years ago. We derive a probabilistic post-processing scheme that controls for the amount of linguistic bias in generative VLMs at test time without having to retrain or fine-tune the model. We show that the VisualGPTScore, when appropriately debiased, is a strong zero-shot baseline for vision-language understanding, oftentimes producing state-of-the-art accuracy.
5/16/2024
VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model
Jie Zhang, Sibo Wang, Xiangkui Cao, Zheng Yuan, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen, Wen Gao
0
0
The emergence of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) marks significant strides towards achieving general artificial intelligence. However, these advancements are tempered by the outputs that often reflect biases, a concern not yet extensively investigated. Existing benchmarks are not sufficiently comprehensive in evaluating biases due to their limited data scale, single questioning format and narrow sources of bias. To address this problem, we introduce VLBiasBench, a benchmark aimed at evaluating biases in LVLMs comprehensively. In VLBiasBench, we construct a dataset encompassing nine distinct categories of social biases, including age, disability status, gender, nationality, physical appearance, race, religion, profession, social economic status and two intersectional bias categories (race x gender, and race x social economic status). To create a large-scale dataset, we use Stable Diffusion XL model to generate 46,848 high-quality images, which are combined with different questions to form 128,342 samples. These questions are categorized into open and close ended types, fully considering the sources of bias and comprehensively evaluating the biases of LVLM from multiple perspectives. We subsequently conduct extensive evaluations on 15 open-source models as well as one advanced closed-source model, providing some new insights into the biases revealing from these models. Our benchmark is available at https://github.com/Xiangkui-Cao/VLBiasBench.
6/21/2024
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
0
0
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
6/14/2024
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactuals
Phillip Howard, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Kathleen C. Fraser, Svetlana Kiritchenko
0
0
With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. Such models condition generated text on both an input image and a text prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. While prior studies have examined the social biases contained in text generated by LLMs, this topic has been relatively unexplored in LVLMs. Examining social biases in LVLMs is particularly challenging due to the confounding contributions of bias induced by information contained across the text and visual modalities. To address this challenging problem, we conduct a large-scale study of text generated by different LVLMs under counterfactual changes to input images. Specifically, we present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets, where each set contains images which are largely identical in their depiction of a common subject (e.g., a doctor), but vary only in terms of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race and gender). We comprehensively evaluate the text produced by different LVLMs under this counterfactual generation setting and find that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence toxicity and the generation of competency-associated words.
6/11/2024