VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees
2312.09748
0
0
Abstract
Machine learning techniques often lack formal correctness guarantees, evidenced by the widespread adversarial examples that plague most deep-learning applications. This lack of formal guarantees resulted in several research efforts that aim at verifying Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), with a particular focus on safety-critical applications. However, formal verification techniques still face major scalability and precision challenges. The over-approximation introduced during the formal verification process to tackle the scalability challenge often results in inconclusive analysis. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework to generate Verification-Friendly Neural Networks (VNNs). We present a post-training optimization framework to achieve a balance between preserving prediction performance and verification-friendliness. Our proposed framework results in VNNs that are comparable to the original DNNs in terms of prediction performance, while amenable to formal verification techniques. This essentially enables us to establish robustness for more VNNs than their DNN counterparts, in a time-efficient manner.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This research paper explores methods for making deep neural networks more "verification-friendly", which means they are easier to formally verify for safety and robustness.
- The authors propose several techniques to improve the verifiability of deep neural networks, including new network architectures and training methods.
- The goal is to develop neural networks that are both accurate and verifiable, to improve the safety and reliability of AI systems in high-stakes applications.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks have become incredibly powerful and accurate at a wide range of tasks, from image recognition to language understanding. However, these complex models can also be challenging to verify and ensure they behave safely, especially in high-stakes applications like self-driving cars or medical diagnosis.
The researchers in this paper set out to make neural networks more "verification-friendly" - essentially, to develop techniques that make it easier to formally prove properties about the neural network's behavior. This could include things like guaranteeing the network will never misclassify certain types of images, or that it will always produce outputs within a safe range.
To do this, the researchers explore new neural network architectures and training methods. For example, they propose a network architecture that has a simpler, more interpretable structure, making it easier to reason about and verify. They also investigate ways to train networks that are more "robust" to small changes in their inputs, reducing the risk of adversarial attacks.
The key insight is that by designing neural networks with verifiability in mind from the start, it's possible to create models that are both highly accurate and reliably safe. This could be a big step forward for using AI in critical, high-stakes applications where we need to be completely sure the system will behave as expected.
Of course, there are still many challenges to overcome, but this research represents an important step towards building AI systems we can truly trust. By making neural networks more "verification-friendly", we can unlock the full potential of deep learning while ensuring it is deployed responsibly and safely.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper propose several techniques to make deep neural networks more "verification-friendly", meaning they are easier to formally verify for safety and robustness properties.
One key approach is a new neural network architecture called a "Verification-Friendly Neural Network" (VFNN). VFNNs have a simpler, more interpretable structure than standard deep neural networks, with fewer layers and connections. This makes it easier to reason about and verify the network's behavior, both during training and deployment.
The authors also introduce new training methods to improve the verifiability of neural networks. For example, they explore "Set-Based Training", which encourages the network to produce consistent outputs for entire regions of the input space, rather than just individual data points. This can make the network more robust to small perturbations, reducing the risk of adversarial attacks.
Another technique covered in the paper is using "Cross-Execution Bound Refinement" to tighten the formal verification bounds of graph convolutional networks (GCNs). This method analyzes the behavior of a GCN across multiple executions to derive tighter, more accurate bounds on its outputs.
The researchers evaluate their verification-friendly techniques on a range of benchmark tasks, demonstrating improvements in both accuracy and verifiability compared to standard neural network models. They also discuss potential limitations and future research directions, such as scaling these methods to larger, more complex neural networks.
Overall, this research represents an important step towards building deep learning systems that are both highly capable and reliably safe. By making neural networks more "verification-friendly" from the ground up, the authors hope to unlock the full potential of AI while ensuring it can be deployed responsibly in high-stakes applications.
Critical Analysis
The researchers in this paper have made a valuable contribution to the field of verifiable deep learning, proposing several techniques to improve the safety and robustness of neural networks. Their focus on "verification-friendly" neural network architectures and training methods is a promising approach, as it aims to address the inherent challenge of verifying the complex, non-linear behavior of deep learning models.
That said, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the proposed methods. For example, the simpler VFNN architecture may come at the cost of reduced representational power compared to standard deep neural networks. Additionally, the set-based training approach, while effective at improving robustness, could potentially make the network less accurate on certain tasks.
Another potential concern is the scalability of these verification-friendly techniques. As neural networks grow larger and more complex, the computational overhead of formal verification may become prohibitive, limiting the practical applicability of these methods. The authors briefly mention this challenge, but further research may be needed to address it.
It's also worth noting that while the paper focuses on improving the verifiability of neural networks, there are other important aspects of AI safety and reliability that were not covered, such as addressing distributional shift and out-of-distribution generalization. Developing a comprehensive set of techniques to ensure the safety and reliability of AI systems in the real world remains an ongoing challenge.
Overall, this research represents a valuable step forward in the quest to build trustworthy and reliable deep learning systems. By continuing to explore innovative approaches to verification and robustness, the field of AI safety can hopefully unlock the full potential of these powerful technologies while keeping them under control.
Conclusion
This paper proposes several techniques to make deep neural networks more "verification-friendly", meaning they are easier to formally verify for safety and robustness properties. The key ideas include a new neural network architecture with a simpler, more interpretable structure, as well as training methods that improve the network's consistency and robustness to small perturbations.
By designing neural networks with verifiability in mind from the start, the researchers aim to create models that are both highly accurate and reliably safe. This could be a significant step forward for using AI in critical, high-stakes applications where we need to be completely sure the system will behave as expected.
While the paper acknowledges some limitations and challenges, such as the potential trade-offs between verifiability and representational power, it represents an important contribution to the growing field of verifiable deep learning. As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous and influential in our lives, ensuring their safety and reliability will only become more crucial. This research brings us closer to that goal, paving the way for a future where we can fully harness the power of deep learning while keeping it under control.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤿
Verifying the Generalization of Deep Learning to Out-of-Distribution Domains
Guy Amir, Osher Maayan, Tom Zelazny, Guy Katz, Michael Schapira
0
0
Deep neural networks (DNNs) play a crucial role in the field of machine learning, demonstrating state-of-the-art performance across various application domains. However, despite their success, DNN-based models may occasionally exhibit challenges with generalization, i.e., may fail to handle inputs that were not encountered during training. This limitation is a significant challenge when it comes to deploying deep learning for safety-critical tasks, as well as in real-world settings characterized by substantial variability. We introduce a novel approach for harnessing DNN verification technology to identify DNN-driven decision rules that exhibit robust generalization to previously unencountered input domains. Our method assesses generalization within an input domain by measuring the level of agreement between independently trained deep neural networks for inputs in this domain. We also efficiently realize our approach by using off-the-shelf DNN verification engines, and extensively evaluate it on both supervised and unsupervised DNN benchmarks, including a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) system for Internet congestion control -- demonstrating the applicability of our approach for real-world settings. Moreover, our research introduces a fresh objective for formal verification, offering the prospect of mitigating the challenges linked to deploying DNN-driven systems in real-world scenarios.
6/10/2024
✅
Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification of DNN-Controlled Systems
Dapeng Zhi, Peixin Wang, Si Liu, Luke Ong, Min Zhang
0
0
The rapid advance of deep reinforcement learning techniques enables the oversight of safety-critical systems through the utilization of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). This underscores the pressing need to promptly establish certified safety guarantees for such DNN-controlled systems. Most of the existing verification approaches rely on qualitative approaches, predominantly employing reachability analysis. However, qualitative verification proves inadequate for DNN-controlled systems as their behaviors exhibit stochastic tendencies when operating in open and adversarial environments. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for unifying both qualitative and quantitative safety verification problems of DNN-controlled systems. This is achieved by formulating the verification tasks as the synthesis of valid neural barrier certificates (NBCs). Initially, the framework seeks to establish almost-sure safety guarantees through qualitative verification. In cases where qualitative verification fails, our quantitative verification method is invoked, yielding precise lower and upper bounds on probabilistic safety across both infinite and finite time horizons. To facilitate the synthesis of NBCs, we introduce their $k$-inductive variants. We also devise a simulation-guided approach for training NBCs, aiming to achieve tightness in computing precise certified lower and upper bounds. We prototype our approach into a tool called $textsf{UniQQ}$ and showcase its efficacy on four classic DNN-controlled systems.
4/3/2024
🏋️
Set-Based Training for Neural Network Verification
Lukas Koller, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff
0
0
Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, i.e., small input perturbations can significantly affect the outputs of a neural network. In safety-critical environments, the inputs often contain noisy sensor data; hence, in this case, neural networks that are robust against input perturbations are required. To ensure safety, the robustness of a neural network must be formally verified. However, training and formally verifying robust neural networks is challenging. We address both of these challenges by employing, for the first time, an end-to-end set-based training procedure that trains robust neural networks for formal verification. Our training procedure trains neural networks, which can be easily verified using simple polynomial-time verification algorithms. Moreover, our extensive evaluation demonstrates that our set-based training procedure effectively trains robust neural networks, which are easier to verify. Set-based trained neural networks consistently match or outperform those trained with state-of-the-art robust training approaches.
4/22/2024
📉
Formal Verification of Graph Convolutional Networks with Uncertain Node Features and Uncertain Graph Structure
Tobias Ladner, Michael Eichelbeck, Matthias Althoff
0
0
Graph neural networks are becoming increasingly popular in the field of machine learning due to their unique ability to process data structured in graphs. They have also been applied in safety-critical environments where perturbations inherently occur. However, these perturbations require us to formally verify neural networks before their deployment in safety-critical environments as neural networks are prone to adversarial attacks. While there exists research on the formal verification of neural networks, there is no work verifying the robustness of generic graph convolutional network architectures with uncertainty in the node features and in the graph structure over multiple message-passing steps. This work addresses this research gap by explicitly preserving the non-convex dependencies of all elements in the underlying computations through reachability analysis with (matrix) polynomial zonotopes. We demonstrate our approach on three popular benchmark datasets.
4/24/2024