Unifying Qualitative and Quantitative Safety Verification of DNN-Controlled Systems
2404.01769
0
0
✅
Abstract
The rapid advance of deep reinforcement learning techniques enables the oversight of safety-critical systems through the utilization of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). This underscores the pressing need to promptly establish certified safety guarantees for such DNN-controlled systems. Most of the existing verification approaches rely on qualitative approaches, predominantly employing reachability analysis. However, qualitative verification proves inadequate for DNN-controlled systems as their behaviors exhibit stochastic tendencies when operating in open and adversarial environments. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for unifying both qualitative and quantitative safety verification problems of DNN-controlled systems. This is achieved by formulating the verification tasks as the synthesis of valid neural barrier certificates (NBCs). Initially, the framework seeks to establish almost-sure safety guarantees through qualitative verification. In cases where qualitative verification fails, our quantitative verification method is invoked, yielding precise lower and upper bounds on probabilistic safety across both infinite and finite time horizons. To facilitate the synthesis of NBCs, we introduce their $k$-inductive variants. We also devise a simulation-guided approach for training NBCs, aiming to achieve tightness in computing precise certified lower and upper bounds. We prototype our approach into a tool called $textsf{UniQQ}$ and showcase its efficacy on four classic DNN-controlled systems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a novel framework for verifying the safety of deep neural network (DNN)-controlled systems, addressing both qualitative and quantitative safety guarantees.
- The framework aims to establish "almost-sure" safety through qualitative verification, and when that fails, it provides precise lower and upper bounds on the probability of safety over finite and infinite time horizons.
- The authors introduce "neural barrier certificates" (NBCs) and their k-inductive variants to facilitate the synthesis of these safety guarantees.
- They also propose a simulation-guided approach for training NBCs to achieve tighter certified safety bounds.
- The framework is implemented in a tool called UniQQ and evaluated on four classic DNN-controlled systems.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are increasingly being used to control safety-critical systems, such as self-driving cars or robotic systems. However, this raises concerns about the safety and reliability of these systems, as DNNs can exhibit unpredictable behavior, especially in open and adversarial environments.
The paper proposes a new approach to address this challenge. It introduces a framework that can verify the safety of DNN-controlled systems, providing both qualitative and quantitative safety guarantees. The qualitative verification aims to establish "almost-sure" safety, meaning the system is highly unlikely to ever enter an unsafe state. When this qualitative approach fails, the framework can still provide precise numerical bounds on the probability of the system remaining safe over both finite and infinite time horizons.
To achieve this, the researchers developed a new concept called "neural barrier certificates" (NBCs). These NBCs are used to synthesize the safety guarantees, and the authors also introduce a more advanced version called "k-inductive NBCs" to improve the tightness of the bounds.
Additionally, the paper presents a simulation-guided approach for training the NBCs, which helps to further refine the safety guarantees and provide even tighter bounds on the probability of safety.
The researchers have implemented this framework in a tool called UniQQ and tested it on four classic DNN-controlled systems, demonstrating its effectiveness in verifying the safety of these complex, safety-critical systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper addresses the pressing need for certified safety guarantees in DNN-controlled systems, as their behavior can exhibit stochastic tendencies when operating in open and adversarial environments. Most existing verification approaches rely on qualitative reachability analysis, which proves inadequate for such systems.
The authors propose a unified framework for both qualitative and quantitative safety verification of DNN-controlled systems. The framework first seeks to establish "almost-sure" safety guarantees through qualitative verification. When this fails, it invokes a quantitative verification method to provide precise lower and upper bounds on the probability of safety over finite and infinite time horizons.
The key to this framework is the introduction of neural barrier certificates (NBCs) and their k-inductive variants. NBCs are used to synthesize the safety guarantees, with the k-inductive version providing tighter bounds. The researchers also devise a simulation-guided approach for training the NBCs, aiming to achieve tighter certified safety bounds.
The proposed framework is implemented in a tool called UniQQ and evaluated on four classic DNN-controlled systems, including a cart-pole balancing task, a quadrotor control problem, and two autonomous driving scenarios. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the unified approach in verifying the safety of these complex, safety-critical systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and innovative approach to the critical problem of safety verification for DNN-controlled systems. The authors' decision to unify both qualitative and quantitative verification methods is a significant advancement, as it addresses the limitations of existing qualitative approaches.
However, the paper does not delve into the computational complexity and scalability of the proposed framework, particularly as the size and complexity of the DNN-controlled systems increase. The authors mention that the simulation-guided training of NBCs aims to achieve tighter certified safety bounds, but they do not provide a detailed analysis of the trade-offs between computational effort and tightness of the bounds.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential challenges in applying the framework to real-world, large-scale DNN-controlled systems, where the complexity of the environment and the number of possible scenarios may pose significant challenges for the verification process.
Further research could explore the integration of the proposed framework with other safety assurance techniques, such as runtime monitoring or adaptive control strategies, to create a more comprehensive safety-critical system design approach. Investigating the framework's applicability to other types of neural networks, beyond just deep neural networks, could also expand its scope and impact.
Conclusion
The paper presents a significant advancement in the field of safety verification for DNN-controlled systems. By unifying qualitative and quantitative verification approaches, the proposed framework can provide both "almost-sure" safety guarantees and precise probabilistic safety bounds. The introduction of neural barrier certificates and the simulation-guided training approach are innovative solutions that help overcome the limitations of existing verification methods.
The implementation and evaluation of the framework on classic DNN-controlled systems demonstrate its practical effectiveness. While the paper does not address all the potential challenges in scaling the approach to complex, real-world systems, it lays the groundwork for further research and development in this critical area. As DNN-controlled systems become more prevalent in safety-critical applications, the ability to verify their safety will be paramount, and this work represents an important step forward in that direction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏅
Verified Safe Reinforcement Learning for Neural Network Dynamic Models
Junlin Wu, Huan Zhang, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
0
0
Learning reliably safe autonomous control is one of the core problems in trustworthy autonomy. However, training a controller that can be formally verified to be safe remains a major challenge. We introduce a novel approach for learning verified safe control policies in nonlinear neural dynamical systems while maximizing overall performance. Our approach aims to achieve safety in the sense of finite-horizon reachability proofs, and is comprised of three key parts. The first is a novel curriculum learning scheme that iteratively increases the verified safe horizon. The second leverages the iterative nature of gradient-based learning to leverage incremental verification, reusing information from prior verification runs. Finally, we learn multiple verified initial-state-dependent controllers, an idea that is especially valuable for more complex domains where learning a single universal verified safe controller is extremely challenging. Our experiments on five safe control problems demonstrate that our trained controllers can achieve verified safety over horizons that are as much as an order of magnitude longer than state-of-the-art baselines, while maintaining high reward, as well as a perfect safety record over entire episodes.
5/28/2024
🧠
Provably Safe Neural Network Controllers via Differential Dynamic Logic
Samuel Teuber, Stefan Mitsch, Andr'e Platzer
0
0
While neural networks (NNs) have potential as autonomous controllers for Cyber-Physical Systems, verifying the safety of NN based control systems (NNCSs) poses significant challenges for the practical use of NNs, especially when safety is needed for unbounded time horizons. One reason is the intractability of analyzing NNs, ODEs and hybrid systems. To this end, we introduce VerSAILLE (Verifiably Safe AI via Logically Linked Envelopes): The first general approach that allows reusing control theory results for NNCS verification. By joining forces, we exploit the efficiency of NN verification tools while retaining the rigor of differential dynamic logic (dL). Based on provably safe control envelopes in dL, we derive specifications for the NN which is proven via NN verification. We show that a proof of the NN adhering to the specification is mirrored by a dL proof on the infinite-time safety of the NNCS. The NN verification properties resulting from hybrid systems typically contain nonlinear arithmetic and arbitrary logical structures while efficient NN verification merely supports linear constraints. To overcome this divide, we present Mosaic: An efficient, sound and complete verification approach for polynomial real arithmetic properties on piece-wise linear NNs. Mosaic partitions complex verification queries into simple queries and lifts off-the-shelf linear constraint tools to the nonlinear setting in a completeness-preserving manner by combining approximation with exact reasoning for counterexample regions. Our evaluation demonstrates the versatility of VerSAILLE and Mosaic: We prove infinite-time safety on the classical Vertical Airborne Collision Avoidance NNCS verification benchmark for two scenarios while (exhaustively) enumerating counterexample regions in unsafe scenarios. We also show that our approach significantly outperforms State-of-the-Art tools in closed-loop NNV.
6/17/2024
VNN: Verification-Friendly Neural Networks with Hard Robustness Guarantees
Anahita Baninajjar, Ahmed Rezine, Amir Aminifar
0
0
Machine learning techniques often lack formal correctness guarantees, evidenced by the widespread adversarial examples that plague most deep-learning applications. This lack of formal guarantees resulted in several research efforts that aim at verifying Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), with a particular focus on safety-critical applications. However, formal verification techniques still face major scalability and precision challenges. The over-approximation introduced during the formal verification process to tackle the scalability challenge often results in inconclusive analysis. To address this challenge, we propose a novel framework to generate Verification-Friendly Neural Networks (VNNs). We present a post-training optimization framework to achieve a balance between preserving prediction performance and verification-friendliness. Our proposed framework results in VNNs that are comparable to the original DNNs in terms of prediction performance, while amenable to formal verification techniques. This essentially enables us to establish robustness for more VNNs than their DNN counterparts, in a time-efficient manner.
6/11/2024
Scalable Surrogate Verification of Image-based Neural Network Control Systems using Composition and Unrolling
Feiyang Cai, Chuchu Fan, Stanley Bak
0
0
Verifying safety of neural network control systems that use images as input is a difficult problem because, from a given system state, there is no known way to mathematically model what images are possible in the real-world. We build on recent work that considers a surrogate verification approach, training a conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) as an image generator in place of the real world. This enables set-based formal analysis of the closed-loop system, providing analysis beyond simulation and testing. While existing work is effective on small examples, excessive overapproximation both within a single control period and across multiple control periods limits its scalability. We propose approaches to overcome these two sources of error. First, we overcome one-step error by composing the system's dynamics along with the cGAN and neural network controller, without losing the dependencies between input states and the control outputs as in the monotonic analysis of the system dynamics. Second, we reduce multi-step error by repeating the single-step composition, essentially unrolling multiple steps of the control loop into a large neural network. We then leverage existing network verification tools to compute accurate reachable sets for multiple steps, avoiding the accumulation of abstraction error at each step. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in terms of both accuracy and scalability using two case studies: an autonomous aircraft taxiing system and an advanced emergency braking system. On the aircraft taxiing system, the converged reachable set is 175% larger using the prior baseline method compared with our proposed approach. On the emergency braking system, with 24x the number of image output variables from the cGAN, the baseline method fails to prove any states are safe, whereas our improvements enable set-based safety analysis.
5/30/2024