Vocabulary Attack to Hijack Large Language Model Applications
2404.02637
0
0
💬
Abstract
The fast advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) are driving an increasing number of applications. Together with the growing number of users, we also see an increasing number of attackers who try to outsmart these systems. They want the model to reveal confidential information, specific false information, or offensive behavior. To this end, they manipulate their instructions for the LLM by inserting separators or rephrasing them systematically until they reach their goal. Our approach is different. It inserts words from the model vocabulary. We find these words using an optimization procedure and embeddings from another LLM (attacker LLM). We prove our approach by goal hijacking two popular open-source LLMs from the Llama2 and the Flan-T5 families, respectively. We present two main findings. First, our approach creates inconspicuous instructions and therefore it is hard to detect. For many attack cases, we find that even a single word insertion is sufficient. Second, we demonstrate that we can conduct our attack using a different model than the target model to conduct our attack with.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- Researchers describe a novel "vocabulary attack" that can hijack the behavior of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT.
- The attack works by carefully crafting prompts that leverage the LLM's inherent biases and training data to change its outputs in unintended ways.
- This could allow bad actors to subvert the intended use of LLMs for malicious purposes like disinformation campaigns.
- The paper explores the technical details of the attack and its potential implications for the safety and reliability of LLM applications.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have become incredibly powerful and versatile tools, with applications ranging from content creation to task automation. However, these models can also be vulnerable to manipulation.
The researchers describe a technique they call a "vocabulary attack" that exploits the way LLMs are trained on language data. By carefully crafting prompts, an attacker can nudge the model to produce outputs that diverge from its intended purpose. For example, they could prompt the model to generate misleading or biased text, even if that goes against the model's original design.
This is concerning because it means bad actors could potentially hijack LLMs to spread disinformation, create fake content, or otherwise subvert the intended use of these powerful AI systems. The paper explores the technical details of how this attack works and the implications for the safety and reliability of LLM applications.
Technical Explanation
The researchers demonstrate a "vocabulary attack" that can manipulate the outputs of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. The key insight is that LLMs learn strong associations between certain words and concepts during training, and these associations can be exploited through carefully crafted prompts.
The attack works by identifying "vocabulary triggers" - specific words or phrases that the LLM has learned to associate with particular behaviors or outputs. By including these triggers in the input prompts, the attacker can nudge the model to generate content that deviates from its intended purpose.
The paper presents experiments showing how vocabulary attacks can be used to make LLMs produce biased, factually incorrect, or even dangerous outputs. For example, the researchers demonstrate prompts that cause the model to endorse conspiracy theories or generate hate speech, despite the model's intended purpose.
Importantly, the researchers note that vocabulary attacks are not limited to malicious use cases. In their experiments, they also show how the technique could be leveraged for benign purposes, such as customizing an LLM's behavior for specific applications or tasks.
Critical Analysis
The vocabulary attack technique described in this paper highlights a fundamental challenge in ensuring the safety and reliability of large language models (LLMs). While these models can be incredibly powerful and versatile, they are also vulnerable to manipulation through carefully crafted inputs.
One key limitation noted by the researchers is that vocabulary attacks rely on the specific biases and associations learned by a given LLM during training. This means the effectiveness of the attack may vary depending on the model architecture, training data, and other factors. Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that countermeasures, such as prompt engineering or model fine-tuning, could potentially be developed to mitigate these attacks.
That said, the broader implications of this research are concerning. If bad actors can reliably hijack the behavior of LLMs, it could have serious consequences for the use of these models in high-stakes applications, such as content moderation, medical diagnostics, or financial decision-making. Addressing these vulnerabilities will be a crucial challenge for the AI research community going forward.
Ultimately, this paper serves as a valuable reminder that as LLMs become more powerful and ubiquitous, we must remain vigilant about their potential misuse and continue to develop robust safeguards to protect against such attacks.
Conclusion
The "vocabulary attack" described in this paper represents a novel and concerning vulnerability in large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT. By carefully crafting prompts that leverage the models' inherent biases and associations, attackers can potentially hijack the behavior of these powerful AI systems and use them for malicious purposes.
The technical details of the attack, as well as the researchers' experiments demonstrating its effectiveness, underscore the need for continued research and development of robust safety and security measures for LLMs. As these models become more widely adopted, understanding and mitigating their vulnerabilities will be crucial to ensuring their trustworthiness and reliability in high-stakes applications.
While the implications of this research are concerning, it also highlights the importance of ongoing efforts to make LLMs more transparent, controllable, and aligned with their intended purposes. By addressing these challenges, the AI research community can help unlock the full potential of these transformative technologies while minimizing the risks of misuse or unintended harm.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Sandwich attack: Multi-language Mixture Adaptive Attack on LLMs
Bibek Upadhayay, Vahid Behzadan
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being developed and applied, but their widespread use faces challenges. These include aligning LLMs' responses with human values to prevent harmful outputs, which is addressed through safety training methods. Even so, bad actors and malicious users have succeeded in attempts to manipulate the LLMs to generate misaligned responses for harmful questions such as methods to create a bomb in school labs, recipes for harmful drugs, and ways to evade privacy rights. Another challenge is the multilingual capabilities of LLMs, which enable the model to understand and respond in multiple languages. Consequently, attackers exploit the unbalanced pre-training datasets of LLMs in different languages and the comparatively lower model performance in low-resource languages than high-resource ones. As a result, attackers use a low-resource languages to intentionally manipulate the model to create harmful responses. Many of the similar attack vectors have been patched by model providers, making the LLMs more robust against language-based manipulation. In this paper, we introduce a new black-box attack vector called the emph{Sandwich attack}: a multi-language mixture attack, which manipulates state-of-the-art LLMs into generating harmful and misaligned responses. Our experiments with five different models, namely Google's Bard, Gemini Pro, LLaMA-2-70-B-Chat, GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, and Claude-3-OPUS, show that this attack vector can be used by adversaries to generate harmful responses and elicit misaligned responses from these models. By detailing both the mechanism and impact of the Sandwich attack, this paper aims to guide future research and development towards more secure and resilient LLMs, ensuring they serve the public good while minimizing potential for misuse.
4/12/2024
Exploring Backdoor Vulnerabilities of Chat Models
Yunzhuo Hao, Wenkai Yang, Yankai Lin
0
0
Recent researches have shown that Large Language Models (LLMs) are susceptible to a security threat known as Backdoor Attack. The backdoored model will behave well in normal cases but exhibit malicious behaviours on inputs inserted with a specific backdoor trigger. Current backdoor studies on LLMs predominantly focus on instruction-tuned LLMs, while neglecting another realistic scenario where LLMs are fine-tuned on multi-turn conversational data to be chat models. Chat models are extensively adopted across various real-world scenarios, thus the security of chat models deserves increasing attention. Unfortunately, we point out that the flexible multi-turn interaction format instead increases the flexibility of trigger designs and amplifies the vulnerability of chat models to backdoor attacks. In this work, we reveal and achieve a novel backdoor attacking method on chat models by distributing multiple trigger scenarios across user inputs in different rounds, and making the backdoor be triggered only when all trigger scenarios have appeared in the historical conversations. Experimental results demonstrate that our method can achieve high attack success rates (e.g., over 90% ASR on Vicuna-7B) while successfully maintaining the normal capabilities of chat models on providing helpful responses to benign user requests. Also, the backdoor can not be easily removed by the downstream re-alignment, highlighting the importance of continued research and attention to the security concerns of chat models. Warning: This paper may contain toxic content.
4/4/2024
Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning
Xiao Wang, Tianze Chen, Xianjun Yang, Qi Zhang, Xun Zhao, Dahua Lin
0
0
The open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. This includes both base models, which are pre-trained on extensive datasets without alignment, and aligned models, deliberately designed to align with ethical standards and human values. Contrary to the prevalent assumption that the inherent instruction-following limitations of base LLMs serve as a safeguard against misuse, our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions. To systematically assess these risks, we introduce a novel set of risk evaluation metrics. Empirical results reveal that the outputs from base LLMs can exhibit risk levels on par with those of models fine-tuned for malicious purposes. This vulnerability, requiring neither specialized knowledge nor training, can be manipulated by almost anyone, highlighting the substantial risk and the critical need for immediate attention to the base LLMs' security protocols.
4/17/2024
Large Language Models for Cyber Security: A Systematic Literature Review
HanXiang Xu, ShenAo Wang, NingKe Li, KaiLong Wang, YanJie Zhao, Kai Chen, Ting Yu, Yang Liu, HaoYu Wang
0
0
The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up new opportunities for leveraging artificial intelligence in various domains, including cybersecurity. As the volume and sophistication of cyber threats continue to grow, there is an increasing need for intelligent systems that can automatically detect vulnerabilities, analyze malware, and respond to attacks. In this survey, we conduct a comprehensive review of the literature on the application of LLMs in cybersecurity (LLM4Security). By comprehensively collecting over 30K relevant papers and systematically analyzing 127 papers from top security and software engineering venues, we aim to provide a holistic view of how LLMs are being used to solve diverse problems across the cybersecurity domain. Through our analysis, we identify several key findings. First, we observe that LLMs are being applied to a wide range of cybersecurity tasks, including vulnerability detection, malware analysis, network intrusion detection, and phishing detection. Second, we find that the datasets used for training and evaluating LLMs in these tasks are often limited in size and diversity, highlighting the need for more comprehensive and representative datasets. Third, we identify several promising techniques for adapting LLMs to specific cybersecurity domains, such as fine-tuning, transfer learning, and domain-specific pre-training. Finally, we discuss the main challenges and opportunities for future research in LLM4Security, including the need for more interpretable and explainable models, the importance of addressing data privacy and security concerns, and the potential for leveraging LLMs for proactive defense and threat hunting. Overall, our survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art in LLM4Security and identifies several promising directions for future research.
5/10/2024