Voice Signal Processing for Machine Learning. The Case of Speaker Isolation
2403.20202
0
0
⚙️
Abstract
The widespread use of automated voice assistants along with other recent technological developments have increased the demand for applications that process audio signals and human voice in particular. Voice recognition tasks are typically performed using artificial intelligence and machine learning models. Even though end-to-end models exist, properly pre-processing the signal can greatly reduce the complexity of the task and allow it to be solved with a simpler ML model and fewer computational resources. However, ML engineers who work on such tasks might not have a background in signal processing which is an entirely different area of expertise. The objective of this work is to provide a concise comparative analysis of Fourier and Wavelet transforms that are most commonly used as signal decomposition methods for audio processing tasks. Metrics for evaluating speech intelligibility are also discussed, namely Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR), Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), and Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI). The level of detail in the exposition is meant to be sufficient for an ML engineer to make informed decisions when choosing, fine-tuning, and evaluating a decomposition method for a specific ML model. The exposition contains mathematical definitions of the relevant concepts accompanied with intuitive non-mathematical explanations in order to make the text more accessible to engineers without deep expertise in signal processing. Formal mathematical definitions and proofs of theorems are intentionally omitted in order to keep the text concise.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines the use of Fourier and Wavelet transforms for audio processing tasks, which are important for applications like voice recognition.
- It also discusses metrics for evaluating speech intelligibility, such as Scale-Invariant Signal-to-Distortion Ratio (SI-SDR), Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), and Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI).
- The goal is to provide guidance for machine learning engineers who may not have a background in signal processing, to help them make informed decisions when choosing, tuning, and evaluating decomposition methods for their models.
Plain English Explanation
Voice recognition and other audio processing tasks are becoming increasingly common, thanks to the widespread use of voice assistants and related technologies. These tasks typically involve using artificial intelligence and machine learning models to interpret and understand audio signals, particularly human speech.
One key step in these processes is decomposing the audio signal into more manageable components. Two commonly used methods for this are Fourier transforms and Wavelet transforms. Fourier transforms break down the signal into its constituent frequencies, while Wavelet transforms analyze the signal at different scales and resolutions.
Properly preprocessing the audio signal in this way can greatly simplify the machine learning task and allow it to be solved with less computational power. However, many machine learning engineers may not have extensive background knowledge in signal processing, which is a separate field of expertise.
This paper aims to provide a clear, concise comparison of Fourier and Wavelet transforms, as well as an overview of the key metrics used to evaluate speech intelligibility, such as SI-SDR, PESQ, and STOI. The goal is to give machine learning practitioners the information they need to make informed decisions about which decomposition method to use for their specific applications, without requiring deep expertise in signal processing.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by acknowledging the growing demand for audio processing applications, driven by the rise of voice assistants and other recent technological developments. It notes that voice recognition tasks are typically performed using AI and machine learning models, and that proper preprocessing of the audio signal can greatly simplify the machine learning problem.
The main focus of the paper is a comparative analysis of Fourier and Wavelet transforms, which are the most commonly used signal decomposition methods for audio processing. The authors provide mathematical definitions of these transforms, along with intuitive, non-technical explanations to make the concepts more accessible to machine learning engineers.
In addition, the paper discusses several metrics for evaluating speech intelligibility, including SI-SDR, PESQ, and STOI. These metrics can be used to assess the performance of machine learning models in tasks like speech recognition and enhancement.
Throughout the paper, the authors aim to strike a balance between technical depth and conciseness, in order to provide machine learning practitioners with the information they need to make informed decisions about signal decomposition and model evaluation, without requiring extensive background knowledge in signal processing.
Critical Analysis
The paper does a commendable job of bridging the gap between signal processing and machine learning, providing a clear and accessible overview of key concepts and tools for audio processing tasks. The authors' decision to include intuitive explanations alongside the formal mathematical definitions is particularly helpful for the target audience of machine learning engineers.
However, the paper does not delve into the specific tradeoffs and considerations involved in choosing between Fourier and Wavelet transforms for a given application. It would be valuable to see more discussion of the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate use cases for each method.
Additionally, the paper could be strengthened by a more thorough exploration of the limitations and potential issues with the speech intelligibility metrics it covers. While the metrics are introduced, there is little discussion of their underlying assumptions, biases, or edge cases where they may produce misleading results.
Overall, this paper provides a solid foundation for machine learning engineers looking to incorporate audio processing capabilities into their work. With some additional context and critical analysis, it could be an even more valuable resource for the field.
Conclusion
This paper offers a concise and accessible introduction to the signal processing techniques and evaluation metrics that are essential for audio processing tasks in machine learning. By comparing Fourier and Wavelet transforms, and explaining key speech intelligibility measures, the authors aim to equip ML engineers with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions when working on voice recognition, speech enhancement, and other audio-based applications.
While the paper could benefit from a deeper exploration of the tradeoffs and limitations involved, it succeeds in its core objective of bridging the gap between signal processing and machine learning. This type of cross-disciplinary knowledge sharing is crucial for advancing the state of the art in audio-based AI systems and enabling further innovation in this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
✨
Research on Feature Extraction Data Processing System For MRI of Brain Diseases Based on Computer Deep Learning
Lingxi Xiao, Jinxin Hu, Yutian Yang, Yinqiu Feng, Zichao Li, Zexi Chen
0
0
Most of the existing wavelet image processing techniques are carried out in the form of single-scale reconstruction and multiple iterations. However, processing high-quality fMRI data presents problems such as mixed noise and excessive computation time. This project proposes the use of matrix operations by combining mixed noise elimination methods with wavelet analysis to replace traditional iterative algorithms. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the auditory cortex of a single subject is analyzed and compared to the wavelet domain signal processing technology based on repeated times and the world's most influential SPM8. Experiments show that this algorithm is the fastest in computing time, and its detection effect is comparable to the traditional iterative algorithm. However, this has a higher practical value for the processing of FMRI data. In addition, the wavelet analysis method proposed signal processing to speed up the calculation rate.
6/26/2024
Towards Signal Processing In Large Language Models
Prateek Verma, Mert Pilanci
0
0
This paper introduces the idea of applying signal processing inside a Large Language Model (LLM). With the recent explosion of generative AI, our work can help bridge two fields together, namely the field of signal processing and large language models. We draw parallels between classical Fourier-Transforms and Fourier Transform-like learnable time-frequency representations for every intermediate activation signal of an LLM. Once we decompose every activation signal across tokens into a time-frequency representation, we learn how to filter and reconstruct them, with all components learned from scratch, to predict the next token given the previous context. We show that for GPT-like architectures, our work achieves faster convergence and significantly increases performance by adding a minuscule number of extra parameters when trained for the same epochs. We hope this work paves the way for algorithms exploring signal processing inside the signals found in neural architectures like LLMs and beyond.
6/18/2024
🔮
Revisiting the Efficacy of Signal Decomposition in AI-based Time Series Prediction
Kexin Jiang, Chuhan Wu, Yaoran Chen
0
0
Time series prediction is a fundamental problem in scientific exploration and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have substantially bolstered its efficiency and accuracy. A well-established paradigm in AI-driven time series prediction is injecting physical knowledge into neural networks through signal decomposition methods, and sustaining progress in numerous scenarios has been reported. However, we uncover non-negligible evidence that challenges the effectiveness of signal decomposition in AI-based time series prediction. We confirm that improper dataset processing with subtle future label leakage is unfortunately widely adopted, possibly yielding abnormally superior but misleading results. By processing data in a strictly causal way without any future information, the effectiveness of additional decomposed signals diminishes. Our work probably identifies an ingrained and universal error in time series modeling, and the de facto progress in relevant areas is expected to be revisited and calibrated to prevent future scientific detours and minimize practical losses.
5/14/2024
🗣️
New!Interpreting Pretrained Speech Models for Automatic Speech Assessment of Voice Disorders
Hok-Shing Lau, Mark Huntly, Nathon Morgan, Adesua Iyenoma, Biao Zeng, Tim Bashford
0
0
Speech contains information that is clinically relevant to some diseases, which has the potential to be used for health assessment. Recent work shows an interest in applying deep learning algorithms, especially pretrained large speech models to the applications of Automatic Speech Assessment. One question that has not been explored is how these models output the results based on their inputs. In this work, we train and compare two configurations of Audio Spectrogram Transformer in the context of Voice Disorder Detection and apply the attention rollout method to produce model relevance maps, the computed relevance of the spectrogram regions when the model makes predictions. We use these maps to analyse how models make predictions in different conditions and to show that the spread of attention is reduced as a model is finetuned, and the model attention is concentrated on specific phoneme regions.
7/2/2024