Want a Ride? Attitudes Towards Autonomous Driving and Behavior in Autonomous Vehicles
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Explores attitudes and behaviors toward autonomous driving and autonomous vehicles (AVs)
- Combines survey data, driving simulator experiments, and qualitative interviews
- Examines factors influencing acceptance and adoption of AVs
Plain English Explanation
This research paper investigates how people feel about and interact with autonomous vehicles (AVs). The researchers used a combination of survey data, driving simulations, and interviews to better understand the attitudes and behaviors of individuals when it comes to autonomous driving.
The study explored the various factors that can influence a person's acceptance and adoption of AVs, such as their perceived benefits and risks, their demographics and personal characteristics, and their interactions with AVs in different scenarios.
By combining these different approaches, the researchers were able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of how people attribute purpose and intention to AVs and how that affects their willingness to use and accept these new transportation technologies.
Technical Explanation
The research paper used a multi-pronged approach to investigate attitudes and behaviors toward autonomous driving and autonomous vehicles (AVs). The researchers combined survey data, driving simulator experiments, and qualitative interviews to explore the various factors that can influence an individual's acceptance and adoption of AVs.
The survey component examined participants' perceptions of the benefits and risks associated with AVs, as well as their personal characteristics and demographics. The driving simulator experiments allowed the researchers to observe how participants interacted with and responded to AVs in different driving scenarios. Finally, the qualitative interviews provided deeper insights into how people attribute purpose and intention to AVs and how that influences their willingness to use and accept these new transportation technologies.
By leveraging these complementary methods, the researchers were able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex and multifaceted attitudes and behaviors surrounding autonomous driving and AVs.
Critical Analysis
The research paper provides a thorough and well-designed investigation into the attitudes and behaviors surrounding autonomous driving and vehicles. The combination of survey data, driving simulations, and qualitative interviews allows the researchers to capture a more holistic picture of this topic, addressing both the rational and emotional factors that can influence an individual's acceptance and adoption of AVs.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations, such as the relatively small sample size and the fact that the driving simulations may not fully reflect real-world driving experiences. Additionally, the researchers note that further research is needed to understand the long-term impacts of widespread AV adoption on transportation systems and society.
Despite these caveats, the insights provided in this paper offer valuable contributions to the understanding of how people perceive and interact with autonomous driving technologies. By identifying the key factors that shape attitudes and behaviors, the research can inform the development and deployment of AVs in a way that promotes greater acceptance and adoption among the general public.
Conclusion
This research paper provides a comprehensive investigation into the attitudes and behaviors surrounding autonomous driving and vehicles. By combining survey data, driving simulator experiments, and qualitative interviews, the researchers were able to gain a multifaceted understanding of the factors that influence an individual's acceptance and adoption of AVs.
The findings of this study offer important insights for the development and deployment of autonomous driving technologies, as they highlight the complex interplay between perceived benefits, risks, personal characteristics, and real-world interactions that shape people's attitudes and behaviors. This knowledge can inform strategies to address potential barriers to AV acceptance and promote a more seamless transition to this new transportation paradigm.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Want a Ride? Attitudes Towards Autonomous Driving and Behavior in Autonomous Vehicles
Enrico Del Re, Leonie Sauer, Marco Polli, Cristina Olaverri-Monreal
Research conducted previously has focused on either attitudes toward or behaviors associated with autonomous driving. In this paper, we bridge these two dimensions by exploring how attitudes towards autonomous driving influence behavior in an autonomous car. We conducted a field experiment with twelve participants engaged in non-driving related tasks. Our findings indicate that attitudes towards autonomous driving do not affect participants' driving interventions in vehicle control and eye glance behavior. Therefore, studies on autonomous driving technology lacking field tests might be unreliable for assessing the potential behaviors, attitudes, and acceptance of autonomous vehicles.
Read more9/5/2024
0
Cultural influence on autonomous vehicles acceptance
Chowdhury Shahriar Muzammel, Maria Spichkova, James Harland
Autonomous vehicles and other intelligent transport systems have been evolving rapidly and are being increasingly deployed worldwide. Previous work has shown that perceptions of autonomous vehicles and attitudes towards them depend on various attributes, including the respondent's age, education level and background. These findings with respect to age and educational level are generally uniform, such as showing that younger respondents are typically more accepting of autonomous vehicles, as are those with higher education levels. However the influence of factors such as culture are much less clear cut. In this paper we analyse the relationship between acceptance of autonomous vehicles and national culture by means of the well-known Hofstede cultural model.
Read more4/8/2024
🐍
0
Propensity towards Ownership and Use of Automated Vehicles: Who Are the Adopters? Who Are the Non-adopters? Who Is Hesitant?
Tho Le, Giovanni Circella
The objective of this study is to investigate automated vehicle (AV) adoption perceptions, including ownership intentions and the willingness to use self-driving mobility services. In this paper, we use data from the 2018 California Transportation Survey, and use K-means, a clustering technique in data mining, to reveal patterns of potential AV owners (and non-owners) as well as AV users (and non-users) of self-driving services. The results reveal seven clusters, namely Multitaskers/ environmentalists/ impaired drivers, Tech mavens/ travelers, Life in transition, Captive car-users, Public/ active transport users, Sub-urban Dwellers, and Car enthusiasts. The first two clusters include adopters who are largely familiar with AVs, are tech savvy, and who make good use of time during their commute. The last cluster comprise of non-adopters who are car enthusiasts. On the other hand, people who are Life in transition, Captive car-users, Public/ active transport users, and Sub-urban dwellers show uncertain perceptions towards being AV adopters. They are either pursuing higher education, having a busy schedule, supporting for sustainable society via government policies, or have a stable life, respectively. Insights from this study help practitioners to build business models and strategic planning, addressing potential market segments of individuals that are willing to own an AV vs. those that are more inclined to use self-driving mobility services. The gray segments identify a latent untapped demand and a potential target for marketing, campaigns, and sales.
Read more7/18/2024
0
People Attribute Purpose to Autonomous Vehicles When Explaining Their Behavior
Balint Gyevnar, Stephanie Droop, Tadeg Quillien, Shay B. Cohen, Neil R. Bramley, Christopher G. Lucas, Stefano V. Albrecht
Cognitive science can help us understand which explanations people might expect, and in which format they frame these explanations, whether causal, counterfactual, or teleological (i.e., purpose-oriented). Understanding the relevance of these concepts is crucial for building good explainable AI (XAI) which offers recourse and actionability. Focusing on autonomous driving, a complex decision-making domain, we report empirical data from two surveys on (i) how people explain the behavior of autonomous vehicles in 14 unique scenarios (N1=54), and (ii) how they perceive these explanations in terms of complexity, quality, and trustworthiness (N2=356). Participants deemed teleological explanations significantly better quality than counterfactual ones, with perceived teleology being the best predictor of perceived quality and trustworthiness. Neither the perceived teleology nor the quality were affected by whether the car was an autonomous vehicle or driven by a person. This indicates that people use teleology to evaluate information about not just other people but also autonomous vehicles. Taken together, our findings highlight the importance of explanations that are framed in terms of purpose rather than just, as is standard in XAI, the causal mechanisms involved. We release the 14 scenarios and more than 1,300 elicited explanations publicly as the Human Explanations for Autonomous Driving Decisions (HEADD) dataset.
Read more5/1/2024