Weisfeiler-Leman at the margin: When more expressivity matters

Overview

• The Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) algorithm is a well-known heuristic for the graph isomorphism problem.
• It has played a key role in understanding the expressive power of message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs) and as an effective graph kernel.
• However, 1-WL faces challenges in distinguishing non-isomorphic graphs, leading to the development of more expressive MPNN and kernel architectures.
• The relationship between an architecture's expressivity and its generalization performance remains unclear.

Plain English Explanation

The Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) algorithm is a technique used to determine if two graphs are the same or different. It's a useful tool for understanding how powerful certain types of machine learning models, called message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs), are at processing and understanding graph-structured data.

While the WL algorithm has been successful, it has trouble telling apart some graphs that are actually different. This has led researchers to develop more advanced MPNN and kernel architectures that are better at this task. However, it's not clear whether these more expressive models also perform better when it comes to making real-world predictions.

Technical Explanation

This paper explores the relationship between an architecture's expressivity, as measured by its ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs, and its generalization performance. The authors show that an architecture's expressivity alone does not necessarily translate to better generalization.

To investigate this further, the authors focus on augmenting the 1-WL algorithm and MPNNs with subgraph information, and use classical margin theory to understand the conditions under which increased expressivity aligns with improved generalization. They also demonstrate that gradient-based training pushes MPNN weights towards a maximum-margin solution.

The paper then introduces new variations of expressive 1-WL-based kernel and MPNN architectures with provable generalization properties. The authors' empirical results confirm the validity of their theoretical findings.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the relationship between an architecture's expressivity and its generalization performance, an important topic in the field of graph representation learning. By leveraging the well-understood 1-WL algorithm and connecting it to margin theory, the authors offer a principled framework for analyzing the expressivity-generalization tradeoff.

However, the paper focuses on a specific aspect of expressivity, namely the ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs. While this is a useful proxy, it may not capture all the nuances of what makes an architecture expressive and generalizable in practice. Additional research is needed to understand the broader implications of expressivity for real-world applications.

Furthermore, the paper's theoretical analysis relies on certain assumptions, such as the availability of a maximum-margin solution. In practice, optimization challenges and other factors may affect the practical relevance of these theoretical results.

Conclusion

This paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the relationship between an architecture's expressivity, as measured by its ability to distinguish non-isomorphic graphs, and its generalization performance. By augmenting the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) algorithm and message-passing graph neural networks (MPNNs) with subgraph information and leveraging margin theory, the authors offer insights into the conditions under which increased expressivity aligns with improved generalization.

The paper's findings suggest that expressivity alone is not a sufficient indicator of an architecture's generalization performance, and that more nuanced considerations are needed. The introduction of new expressive 1-WL-based kernel and MPNN architectures with provable generalization properties is a valuable contribution to the field of graph representation learning.