What Can Interactive Visualization do for Participatory Budgeting in Chicago?

Overview

• Participatory budgeting (PB) is a democratic approach to allocating municipal spending that has gained popularity in recent years.
• Current PB voting resembles a ballot where residents choose which municipal projects to fund with a limited budget.
• This work explores how interactive visualization can benefit PB through a design probe-based interview study with policy workers and academics.

Plain English Explanation

Participatory budgeting is a way for residents to have a direct say in how their city spends money. Instead of local government making all the decisions, PB allows citizens to vote on things like school improvements or road repairs that they want to see funded.

The researchers in this study wanted to understand how using interactive data visualizations could improve the PB process. They interviewed 13 experts in areas like urban planning and civic technology to get their thoughts.

The researchers found that visualizations could help city governments set realistic expectations about budget constraints, while also giving residents more freedom to express their preferences. However, they also noted that using visualizations requires efforts to make sure everyone can access the information and that people trust the process.

The researchers recommend that more data visualization professionals get involved in working on and studying political systems like participatory budgeting. They believe this could help build the capacity of local governments to use data and technology to engage citizens more effectively.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a design probe-based interview study (N=13) with policy workers and academics who have expertise in participatory budgeting, urban planning, and civic human-computer interaction (HCI). The goal was to explore how graphical elicitation of voter preferences and a dashboard of voting statistics could be incorporated into a realistic PB tool.

Through qualitative analysis, the researchers found that using visualization in PB can create opportunities for city governments to set clear expectations about budget constraints, while also granting their constituents greater freedom to articulate a wider range of preferences. However, the researchers note that providing transparency about PB through visualization requires efforts to mitigate potential access barriers and build trust.

The researchers call for more visualization professionals to get involved in working on and studying political systems, in order to help build the civic capacity of local governments to engage citizens more effectively using data and technology.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while visualization can enhance transparency and citizen engagement in PB, there are challenges around ensuring equitable access and building trust in the process. They note that further research is needed to understand how to best design visualization tools that address these concerns.

One potential limitation is the relatively small sample size of 13 interview participants, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the researchers did not test the proposed visualization concepts with actual PB participants, so the real-world effectiveness remains to be seen.

Future research could explore how different visualization approaches impact citizen engagement, trust, and the ultimate outcomes of PB processes. It would also be valuable to investigate barriers to adoption and ways to encourage more data visualization professionals to contribute to civic technology projects.

Conclusion

This study suggests that interactive visualization has the potential to improve participatory budgeting by helping governments set realistic expectations while giving residents more freedom to express their preferences. However, care must be taken to ensure equal access and build trust in the process.

The researchers call for greater involvement from data visualization experts to help local governments leverage technology and data to enhance citizen engagement in political systems. Continued research and collaboration between civic technologists, policymakers, and the public could lead to more effective and inclusive participatory budgeting practices.