When predict can also explain: few-shot prediction to select better neural latents

Overview

• Latent variable models are powerful tools for inferring underlying dynamics from observed neural activity.
• Prediction benchmarks are often used as proxies due to the lack of ground truth data.
• This study reveals limitations of the widely-used 'co-smoothing' prediction framework and proposes an improved few-shot prediction approach.

Plain English Explanation

Latent variable models are mathematical tools that can be used to understand the hidden or 'latent' processes that drive observed data, such as neural activity in the brain. However, since we don't have direct access to the true underlying dynamics, researchers often rely on prediction benchmarks as a way to evaluate these models.

This paper shows that a common prediction framework called 'co-smoothing' has some significant limitations. The authors introduce a new approach called 'few-shot co-smoothing' that can better identify latent variable models that accurately reflect the true underlying dynamics, rather than just fitting the observed data well.

The key insight is that high co-smoothing performance doesn't necessarily mean the latent variables are capturing the right kind of dynamics. The authors demonstrate that some models can achieve good co-smoothing scores while still having 'extraneous' dynamics in their latent representations that don't reflect the true underlying processes.

To address this, the few-shot co-smoothing metric looks at how well the latent variables can predict held-out data using only a small number of samples. This helps distinguish models that have captured the essential dynamics from those that have learned unnecessary additional complexity.

The authors validate this approach on both simulated and real neural data, showing that it can identify models that better capture the true underlying latent dynamics compared to the standard co-smoothing benchmark.

Technical Explanation

The authors utilize a student-teacher setup with Hidden Markov Models to demonstrate that the high co-smoothing model space can encompass models with arbitrary extraneous dynamics within their latent representations.

To address this, they introduce a secondary metric - a few-shot version of co-smoothing. This involves performing regression from the latent variables to held-out channels in the data using fewer trials. Their results indicate that among models with near-optimal co-smoothing, those with extraneous dynamics underperform in the few-shot co-smoothing compared to 'minimal' models devoid of such dynamics.

The authors also provide analytical insights into the origin of this phenomenon. They further validate their findings on real neural data using two state-of-the-art methods: LFADS and STNDT.

In the absence of ground truth, the authors suggest a proxy measure to quantify extraneous dynamics. By cross-decoding the latent variables of all model pairs with high co-smoothing, they identify models with minimal extraneous dynamics. They find a correlation between few-shot co-smoothing performance and this new measure.

Critical Analysis

The authors acknowledge the lack of ground truth data as a significant limitation in evaluating latent variable models for neural data. While the proposed few-shot co-smoothing metric shows promise in identifying models that better capture the true underlying dynamics, it would be valuable to validate this approach on datasets where the ground truth is known.

Additionally, the authors' proxy measure for quantifying extraneous dynamics, based on cross-decoding of latent variables, could potentially be influenced by factors beyond just the accuracy of the latent representations. Further investigation into the reliability and generalizability of this measure would be worthwhile.

It would also be interesting to see how the few-shot co-smoothing approach compares to other recently proposed techniques for assessing latent variable models, such as stretched measured neural predictions or model-free prediction uncertainty assessment.

Overall, this study provides a valuable contribution to the field of latent variable modeling for neural data, highlighting the importance of going beyond standard prediction benchmarks and developing more nuanced evaluation methods to ensure the latent representations capture the true underlying dynamics.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel few-shot prediction metric designed to yield latent variables that more accurately reflect the ground truth, offering a significant improvement for latent dynamics inference from neural data. By addressing the limitations of the widely-used co-smoothing framework, the authors have introduced a valuable tool for the field of computational neuroscience, which could have important implications for our understanding of brain function.