Why Machines Can't Be Moral: Turing's Halting Problem and the Moral Limits of Artificial Intelligence

Overview

• The essay argues that explicit ethical machines, which infer moral principles through a bottom-up approach, cannot replicate human-like moral reasoning and should not be considered moral agents.
• It uses Alan Turing's theory of computation to demonstrate that moral reasoning is computationally intractable for these machines due to the halting problem.
• The essay formalizes moral problems into 'algorithmic moral questions' and explores moral psychology's dual-process model to address the frontiers of machine ethics.

Plain English Explanation

The essay discusses the limitations of explicit ethical machines, which are artificial agents designed to make moral decisions. These machines use a bottom-up approach to infer moral principles, rather than being programmed with specific ethical rules.

The author argues that these machines are unable to replicate the way humans engage in moral reasoning. They use Alan Turing's theory of computation to demonstrate that moral reasoning is a computationally intractable problem for these machines due to the halting problem.

The halting problem is a fundamental limitation in computer science that states it is impossible to predict with certainty whether a computational process will eventually halt or run forever. The author uses a thought experiment involving a military drone to illustrate how this issue can prevent an artificial agent from making a decision in all instances, undermining its ability to be considered a moral agent.

The essay also explores the frontiers of machine ethics by formalizing moral problems into 'algorithmic moral questions' and examining the dual-process model of moral psychology. This model suggests that moral reasoning involves both intuitive and deliberative processes, which the author argues are difficult to replicate in explicit ethical machines.

Technical Explanation

The essay begins by outlining the concept of explicit ethical machines, which infer moral principles through a bottom-up approach, rather than being programmed with specific ethical rules. The author argues that these machines are unable to replicate human-like moral reasoning and should not be considered moral agents.

To support this claim, the author utilizes Alan Turing's theory of computation to demonstrate that moral reasoning is computationally intractable for these machines due to the halting problem. The halting problem states that it is impossible to predict with certainty whether a computational process will eventually halt or run forever.

The essay then formalizes moral problems into 'algorithmic moral questions' and explores the dual-process model of moral psychology, which suggests that moral reasoning involves both intuitive and deliberative processes. The author argues that these elements are difficult to replicate in explicit ethical machines.

A thought experiment involving a military drone is used to illustrate how the halting problem can prevent an artificial agent from making a decision in all instances, undermining its ability to be considered a moral agent.

Critical Analysis

The essay raises valid concerns about the limitations of explicit ethical machines in replicating human-like moral reasoning. The author's use of Alan Turing's theory of computation and the halting problem provides a strong theoretical foundation for the argument.

However, the essay could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the dual-process model of moral psychology and the challenges it poses for the development of moral reasoning in artificial agents. Additionally, the author could explore potential solutions or alternative approaches to addressing the limitations of explicit ethical machines, such as the use of hybrid systems that combine bottom-up and top-down approaches.

Conclusion

The essay presents a compelling argument that explicit ethical machines, which infer moral principles through a bottom-up approach, are unable to replicate human-like moral reasoning and should not be considered moral agents. By leveraging Alan Turing's theory of computation and the halting problem, the author demonstrates the fundamental limitations of these machines in making moral decisions. The essay's exploration of the frontiers of machine ethics, including the formalization of moral problems into 'algorithmic moral questions' and the examination of moral psychology's dual-process model, provides valuable insights into the challenges of developing artificial moral reasoning.