Women's Participation in Computing: Evolving Research Methods

Overview

• This paper presents new data on women's participation as research-article authors in 13 early ACM Special Interest Groups (SIGs) from 1970-2000.
• The research builds on previous work that developed a method for assessing the number of women computer scientists before the availability of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on the IT workforce.
• The paper connects this earlier research to a recent ACM SIG Heritage presentation and outlines the choices and considerations in developing and refining the mixed methods research approach.

Plain English Explanation

The paper examines the participation of women as authors of research articles in 13 early ACM Special Interest Groups (SIGs) from 1970 to 2000. The researchers found that women's participation as authors grew significantly over this time period, but there were also remarkable differences in women's participation between the different SIGs.

This research builds on previous studies that created a way to measure the number of women in computer science before the government started collecting that data. The earlier work also allowed the researchers to focus on specific sub-fields within the broader computing field.

This new paper expands on that prior research and connects it to a recent presentation at an ACM event about the history of ACM's SIGs. It also discusses the choices and considerations the researchers made as they developed and refined their mixed methods approach, which uses both quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents new empirical data on the participation of women as research-article authors in 13 early ACM Special Interest Groups (SIGs) from 1970 to 2000. This builds on several earlier publications that developed a research method for assessing the number of women computer scientists prior to the availability of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data on the IT workforce.

The key innovation of the earlier work was to enable focused investigation of women's participation in varied sub-fields within computing, rather than relying only on aggregate workforce data. This new paper expands on those earlier articles and connects the research to a recent ACM SIG Heritage presentation.

In terms of methodology, the researchers used a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of publication data with qualitative coding and interpretation. This allowed them to uncover both broad trends in women's participation as well as contextual details about the differences between SIGs.

The paper outlines some of the specific choices and considerations the researchers made in developing and refining this research approach over time. This includes decisions around data sources, coding schemas, and analytical techniques. The authors also discuss extensions of the research that are currently being explored.

Critical Analysis

The paper's strengths lie in its innovative research method, which enables a more nuanced understanding of women's participation in specific computing sub-fields compared to relying solely on broad workforce statistics. By connecting the quantitative data to qualitative insights, the researchers are able to uncover important contextual factors that help explain the observed differences in women's representation across the SIGs.

However, as with any research, there are some potential limitations and caveats to consider. The paper acknowledges that the data is limited to research article authorship, which may not fully capture other forms of participation and contributions. Additionally, the focus on a specific set of 13 SIGs, while providing valuable insights, may not be representative of the entire computing field.

Further research could explore expanding the analysis to a wider range of SIGs or other venues, as well as investigating other indicators of women's involvement, such as leadership roles, conference presentations, and service contributions. Longitudinal studies tracking changes over time would also provide valuable context.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution by demonstrating the value of focusing on sub-field dynamics rather than relying solely on aggregate data. The authors' thoughtful discussion of their research process sets a strong foundation for continued exploration of gender patterns in the history and evolution of the computing field.

Conclusion

This paper presents new data on the participation of women as research-article authors in 13 early ACM Special Interest Groups (SIGs) from 1970 to 2000. The research builds on previous work that developed innovative methods for assessing women's representation in computing prior to the availability of government workforce data.

By combining quantitative analysis of publication data with qualitative insights, the researchers were able to uncover significant growth in women's participation as authors across the 1970-2000 period, as well as remarkable differences in women's representation between the various SIGs. This nuanced understanding of sub-field dynamics provides valuable context that can inform efforts to promote greater gender diversity and inclusion in computing.

The paper's thoughtful discussion of the research process and potential avenues for future exploration sets the stage for continued investigation into the historical trajectories and patterns of women's participation in the field of computer science.