Writing with AI Lowers Psychological Ownership, but Longer Prompts Can Help

Read original: arXiv:2404.03108 - Published 8/26/2024 by Nikhita Joshi, Daniel Vogel
Total Score

0

Writing with AI Lowers Psychological Ownership, but Longer Prompts Can Help

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Writing with AI can lower a person's sense of psychological ownership over the content they have created.
  • However, providing longer prompts when using AI can help mitigate this effect.
  • The researchers conducted controlled experiments to study the impact of AI-assisted writing on psychological ownership.

Plain English Explanation

When people create content using AI-powered writing tools, they may feel less of a personal connection to that content compared to content they write entirely on their own. This could happen because the AI is contributing a significant portion of the writing, so the person doesn't feel as much ownership over the final product.

However, the researchers found that giving people longer, more detailed prompts to start with can help boost their sense of psychological ownership, even when using AI to assist with the writing. The longer prompts provide more context and guidance, making the person feel more involved in the creative process.

The key insight is that the level of psychological ownership people feel is influenced by the extent to which they perceive the content as truly their own creation. Providing more guidance upfront when using AI can help maintain that sense of ownership, even if the AI is doing a lot of the actual writing.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a series of controlled experiments to investigate how using AI-powered writing tools affects people's sense of psychological ownership over the content they create. In the experiments, participants were asked to write short passages on various topics, with some using an AI writing assistant and others writing entirely on their own.

The researchers measured the participants' feelings of ownership and authorship over the final written content. They found that people tended to report lower levels of psychological ownership when using the AI writing tool compared to writing the content entirely themselves.

However, the researchers also discovered that providing longer and more detailed prompts to start with could help mitigate this effect. When given more guidance and context upfront, participants using the AI tool felt a greater sense of ownership over the final written work.

The researchers suggest that this is because the more extensive prompts make the person feel more involved in the creative process, even if the AI is doing a significant portion of the actual writing. This helps maintain their perception that the content is their own creation.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations to their study, including the relatively short length of the writing tasks and the use of a single AI writing assistant. It's possible that different AI systems or writing scenarios could produce different results.

Additionally, the researchers did not investigate longer-term effects or how psychological ownership might evolve over multiple writing sessions using AI. Further research would be needed to fully understand the nuances of how AI-assisted writing impacts a person's sense of ownership and authorship.

Overall, the study provides valuable insights into an important issue as AI writing tools become more prevalent. The finding that longer prompts can help maintain psychological ownership is a useful design consideration for developers of these technologies. However, more research is needed to fully understand the complex relationship between AI, creativity, and human agency.

Conclusion

This study suggests that while using AI-powered writing tools can diminish a person's sense of psychological ownership over the content they create, providing more detailed prompts and guidance can help mitigate this effect. As AI writing assistants become more advanced and widely adopted, understanding how to support people's feelings of authorship and creative control will be an important area of research and development.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Writing with AI Lowers Psychological Ownership, but Longer Prompts Can Help
Total Score

0

Writing with AI Lowers Psychological Ownership, but Longer Prompts Can Help

Nikhita Joshi, Daniel Vogel

Feelings of something belonging to someone is called psychological ownership. A common assumption is that writing with generative AI lowers psychological ownership, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. We report on two experiments to examine the relationship between psychological ownership and prompt length. Participants wrote short stories either completely by themselves or wrote prompts of varying lengths, enforced through word limits. Results show that when participants wrote longer prompts, they had higher levels of psychological ownership. Their comments suggest they thought more about their prompts, often adding more details. However, benefits plateaued when prompt length was 75-100% of the target story length. To work in current interfaces, we propose creating a soft constraint in the interface to nudge behaviour. Results show that a submit button that must be held down a long time if the prompt is short is effective at increasing prompt length.

Read more

8/26/2024

LLMs as Writing Assistants: Exploring Perspectives on Sense of Ownership and Reasoning
Total Score

0

LLMs as Writing Assistants: Exploring Perspectives on Sense of Ownership and Reasoning

Azmine Toushik Wasi, Mst Rafia Islam, Raima Islam

Sense of ownership in writing confines our investment of thoughts, time, and contribution, leading to attachment to the output. However, using writing assistants introduces a mental dilemma, as some content isn't directly our creation. For instance, we tend to credit Large Language Models (LLMs) more in creative tasks, even though all tasks are equal for them. Additionally, while we may not claim complete ownership of LLM-generated content, we freely claim authorship. We conduct a short survey to examine these issues and understand underlying cognitive processes in order to gain a better knowledge of human-computer interaction in writing and improve writing aid systems.

Read more

7/30/2024

Ai.llude: Encouraging Rewriting AI-Generated Text to Support Creative Expression
Total Score

0

Ai.llude: Encouraging Rewriting AI-Generated Text to Support Creative Expression

David Zhou, Sarah Sterman

In each step of the creative writing process, writers must grapple with their creative goals and individual perspectives. This process affects the writer's sense of authenticity and their engagement with the written output. Fluent text generation by AIs risks undermining the reflective loop of rewriting. We hypothesize that deliberately generating imperfect intermediate text can encourage rewriting and prompt higher level decision making. Using logs from 27 writing sessions using a text generation AI, we characterize how writers adapt and rewrite AI suggestions, and show that intermediate suggestions significantly motivate and increase rewriting. We discuss the implications of this finding, and future steps for investigating how to leverage intermediate text in AI writing support tools to support ownership over creative expression.

Read more

5/29/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI

Zhicheng Lin

Academic writing is an indispensable yet laborious part of the research enterprise. This Perspective maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. We introduce a human-AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (why), process (how), and nature (what) of AI engagement in writing. The framework pinpoints both short-term and long-term reasons for engagement and their underlying mechanisms (e.g., cognitive offloading and imaginative stimulation). It reveals the role of AI throughout the writing process, conceptualized through a two-stage model for human-AI collaborative writing, and the nature of AI assistance in writing, represented through a model of writing-assistance types and levels. Building on this framework, we describe effective prompting techniques for incorporating AI into the writing routine (outlining, drafting, and editing) as well as strategies for maintaining rigorous scholarship, adhering to varied journal policies, and avoiding overreliance on AI. Ultimately, the prudent integration of AI into academic writing can ease the communication burden, empower authors, accelerate discovery, and promote diversity in science.

Read more

8/14/2024