Zero-shot LLM-guided Counterfactual Generation for Text
2405.04793
0
0
🛸
Abstract
Counterfactual examples are frequently used for model development and evaluation in many natural language processing (NLP) tasks. Although methods for automated counterfactual generation have been explored, such methods depend on models such as pre-trained language models that are then fine-tuned on auxiliary, often task-specific datasets. Collecting and annotating such datasets for counterfactual generation is labor intensive and therefore, infeasible in practice. Therefore, in this work, we focus on a novel problem setting: textit{zero-shot counterfactual generation}. To this end, we propose a structured way to utilize large language models (LLMs) as general purpose counterfactual example generators. We hypothesize that the instruction-following and textual understanding capabilities of recent LLMs can be effectively leveraged for generating high quality counterfactuals in a zero-shot manner, without requiring any training or fine-tuning. Through comprehensive experiments on various downstream tasks in natural language processing (NLP), we demonstrate the efficacy of LLMs as zero-shot counterfactual generators in evaluating and explaining black-box NLP models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to generating counterfactual examples for evaluating and explaining natural language processing (NLP) models.
- Counterfactual examples are hypothetical inputs that are similar to real-world examples but have a different outcome, allowing researchers to better understand model behavior.
- While previous methods have relied on fine-tuning models on task-specific datasets, this paper proposes a zero-shot approach that leverages the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to generate high-quality counterfactuals without any training.
Plain English Explanation
Counterfactual examples are a powerful tool for understanding how AI models work. They're like thought experiments - what if we changed this part of the input, how would the model's output change? This paper explores a new way to generate these counterfactual examples using large language models (LLMs).
Previous methods for generating counterfactuals required training special models on datasets that had been carefully curated and annotated. This is a lot of work, so the researchers in this paper came up with a clever solution - they realized that the amazing text generation capabilities of modern LLMs could be used to create counterfactuals on the fly, without any additional training.
The key insight is that LLMs are really good at understanding language and following instructions. So the researchers can simply give the LLM a prompt like "Generate a sentence that is similar to this one, but with a different sentiment." The LLM then uses its deep understanding of language to generate a high-quality counterfactual example, which the researchers can then use to probe and explain the behavior of their NLP models.
Technical Explanation
This paper presents a novel approach to generating counterfactual examples for evaluating and explaining NLP models in a zero-shot manner, without requiring any task-specific training or fine-tuning.
The core idea is to leverage the impressive textual understanding and generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to produce high-quality counterfactuals on demand. The researchers hypothesized that LLMs, with their deep knowledge of language, would be able to generate relevant counterfactual examples simply by following prompts like "Generate a sentence similar to this one, but with a different sentiment."
To test this hypothesis, the researchers conducted comprehensive experiments across a variety of NLP tasks, including text classification, question answering, and natural language inference. They found that LLMs were indeed effective at generating meaningful counterfactuals in a zero-shot manner, without any task-specific training.
Moreover, the researchers demonstrated that these LLM-generated counterfactuals could be used to explain the behavior of black-box NLP models by identifying the key features that drove the model's predictions. This highlights the potential of LLMs as general-purpose counterfactual example generators, which could significantly streamline the process of model development and evaluation in NLP.
Critical Analysis
The researchers present a compelling and well-executed study, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further exploration:
-
Generalization to more complex tasks: While the experiments covered a range of NLP tasks, the researchers acknowledged that the counterfactual generation may be more challenging for tasks with higher linguistic complexity, such as dialogue or open-ended generation. Further research is needed to assess the scalability of this approach.
-
Human evaluation: The paper primarily relied on automated metrics to evaluate the quality of the generated counterfactuals. Incorporating human evaluation could provide additional insights into the meaningfulness and usefulness of the counterfactuals from a human perspective.
-
Robustness to model biases: The researchers mentioned that the counterfactuals may inherit biases present in the LLMs used for generation. Exploring methods to mitigate these biases, or to generate more diverse and unbiased counterfactuals, could be an important area for future work.
Overall, this paper presents a promising zero-shot approach to counterfactual generation that could significantly streamline the development and evaluation of NLP models. Further research building on these findings could lead to more robust and explainable AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to generating counterfactual examples for evaluating and explaining NLP models using large language models (LLMs) in a zero-shot manner. By leveraging the impressive textual understanding and generation capabilities of LLMs, the researchers demonstrate that high-quality counterfactuals can be produced without the need for task-specific training or fine-tuning.
The ability to generate meaningful counterfactuals on demand has the potential to greatly accelerate the development and evaluation of NLP models, as well as improve their transparency and explainability. While there are some limitations that warrant further research, this work represents an important step towards more robust and accountable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LLMs for Generating and Evaluating Counterfactuals: A Comprehensive Study
Van Bach Nguyen, Paul Youssef, Jorg Schlotterer, Christin Seifert
0
0
As NLP models become more complex, understanding their decisions becomes more crucial. Counterfactuals (CFs), where minimal changes to inputs flip a model's prediction, offer a way to explain these models. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in NLP tasks, their efficacy in generating high-quality CFs remains uncertain. This work fills this gap by investigating how well LLMs generate CFs for two NLU tasks. We conduct a comprehensive comparison of several common LLMs, and evaluate their CFs, assessing both intrinsic metrics, and the impact of these CFs on data augmentation. Moreover, we analyze differences between human and LLM-generated CFs, providing insights for future research directions. Our results show that LLMs generate fluent CFs, but struggle to keep the induced changes minimal. Generating CFs for Sentiment Analysis (SA) is less challenging than NLI where LLMs show weaknesses in generating CFs that flip the original label. This also reflects on the data augmentation performance, where we observe a large gap between augmenting with human and LLMs CFs. Furthermore, we evaluate LLMs' ability to assess CFs in a mislabelled data setting, and show that they have a strong bias towards agreeing with the provided labels. GPT4 is more robust against this bias and its scores correlate well with automatic metrics. Our findings reveal several limitations and point to potential future work directions.
5/3/2024
🏋️
Interactive Analysis of LLMs using Meaningful Counterfactuals
Furui Cheng, Vil'em Zouhar, Robin Shing Moon Chan, Daniel Furst, Hendrik Strobelt, Mennatallah El-Assady
0
0
Counterfactual examples are useful for exploring the decision boundaries of machine learning models and determining feature attributions. How can we apply counterfactual-based methods to analyze and explain LLMs? We identify the following key challenges. First, the generated textual counterfactuals should be meaningful and readable to users and thus can be mentally compared to draw conclusions. Second, to make the solution scalable to long-form text, users should be equipped with tools to create batches of counterfactuals from perturbations at various granularity levels and interactively analyze the results. In this paper, we tackle the above challenges and contribute 1) a novel algorithm for generating batches of complete and meaningful textual counterfactuals by removing and replacing text segments in different granularities, and 2) LLM Analyzer, an interactive visualization tool to help users understand an LLM's behaviors by interactively inspecting and aggregating meaningful counterfactuals. We evaluate the proposed algorithm by the grammatical correctness of its generated counterfactuals using 1,000 samples from medical, legal, finance, education, and news datasets. In our experiments, 97.2% of the counterfactuals are grammatically correct. Through a use case, user studies, and feedback from experts, we demonstrate the usefulness and usability of the proposed interactive visualization tool.
5/3/2024
🏷️
Generation-driven Contrastive Self-training for Zero-shot Text Classification with Instruction-following LLM
Ruohong Zhang, Yau-Shian Wang, Yiming Yang
0
0
The remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot language understanding has garnered significant attention. However, employing LLMs for large-scale inference or domain-specific fine-tuning requires immense computational resources due to their substantial model size. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a novel method, namely GenCo, which leverages the strong generative power of LLMs to assist in training a smaller and more adaptable language model. In our method, an LLM plays an important role in the self-training loop of a smaller model in two important ways. Firstly, the LLM is used to augment each input instance with a variety of possible continuations, enriching its semantic context for better understanding. Secondly, it helps crafting additional high-quality training pairs, by rewriting input texts conditioned on predicted labels. This ensures the generated texts are highly relevant to the predicted labels, alleviating the prediction error during pseudo-labeling, while reducing the dependency on large volumes of unlabeled text. In our experiments, GenCo outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods when only limited ($<5%$ of original) in-domain text data is available. Notably, our approach surpasses the performance of Alpaca-7B with human prompts, highlighting the potential of leveraging LLM for self-training.
4/16/2024
Uncovering Bias in Large Vision-Language Models with Counterfactuals
Phillip Howard, Anahita Bhiwandiwalla, Kathleen C. Fraser, Svetlana Kiritchenko
0
0
With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) possessing increasingly impressive capabilities, a number of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have been proposed to augment LLMs with visual inputs. Such models condition generated text on both an input image and a text prompt, enabling a variety of use cases such as visual question answering and multimodal chat. While prior studies have examined the social biases contained in text generated by LLMs, this topic has been relatively unexplored in LVLMs. Examining social biases in LVLMs is particularly challenging due to the confounding contributions of bias induced by information contained across the text and visual modalities. To address this challenging problem, we conduct a large-scale study of text generated by different LVLMs under counterfactual changes to input images. Specifically, we present LVLMs with identical open-ended text prompts while conditioning on images from different counterfactual sets, where each set contains images which are largely identical in their depiction of a common subject (e.g., a doctor), but vary only in terms of intersectional social attributes (e.g., race and gender). We comprehensively evaluate the text produced by different LVLMs under this counterfactual generation setting and find that social attributes such as race, gender, and physical characteristics depicted in input images can significantly influence toxicity and the generation of competency-associated words.
6/11/2024